Before you learned to talk, how did you think?
Ahnimus
Posts: 10,560
A question for everyone.
Does anyone remember life before language?
What did your thoughts consist of?
When you think now, what language is it?
Does anyone remember life before language?
What did your thoughts consist of?
When you think now, what language is it?
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
I've thought of this same question in another way....
Obviously pets (well all animals for that matter) have a thought process. This is shown by how they react to verbal commands, hand gestures, their day to day actions. How do they process this in their mind without a languance in their head to reason it all out?
The answer must be some kind of instinct, similar to how we breath, digest, etc without willing ourselves to do so. However, it's hard to bridge that with a dog playing with a ball, etc.
I agree. Although I do have abstract thoughts that aren't clearly represented by language. It seems difficult to formulate words to always describe them. In many of these cases, I'm not entirely certain what the thoughts are, eventually they come through in language and then they are clear.
For the most part, they say people think in language. I certainly do. Some theorize that without language, we wouldn't be consciously aware of our thoughts.
Without language, I don't know how we possibly could be aware of our thoughts.
Back to the dog example...a dog obviously is aware that chasing after a stick is fun, and it does experience emotion (happiness) and expresses it by wagging its tail. However, how does the dog know it's having fun without some kind of language to reason it out?
Without internal language to rationalize, how does it learn and know to bark and be playful when it wants outside?
Etc....
It seems silly but it's pretty perplexing when you think about it.....
Must have felt like a state of total confusion.
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
Could the moment have been burned into my subconscious until language kicked in for me to form an understanding of it? I don't know how to make any sense of it.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
That sounds like a reasonable explanation.
A lot of it may be filled-in-blanks as well. I lost pretty much all of my memory from the first 7 - 10 years of my life. Yet, lately I seem to remember things exactly as they've been told to me by family. I believe these memories are just manifestations.
I think only someone who was brought up by wolves or something with no human interaction will be able to answer this question.
---
London, Brixton, 14 July 1993
London, Wembley, 1996
London, Wembley, 18 June 2007
London, O2, 18 August 2009
London, Hammersmith Apollo (Ed solo), 31 July 2012
Milton Keynes Bowl, 11 July 2014
Well they do claim to be able to draw out repressed memories via hypnosis. I just wonder how does the brain know what to do with verbal information without the structure of language to effectively process it? Perhaps it's similar to how we communicate with dogs (animals). Dogs go by the tonal sounds of our words and form understanding. If you call your dog Sascha for example. If you say Mashca, Tascha etc... in the same manner they dog responds immediately (mine does anyways ).
Perhaps our brains (as they are essentially sponges at that early age) can retain sequences of sounds like an vague echo which we later can apply language to and understand.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
i just came home from seeing my grandsons and spent the majority of the time saying "nose...yup that's gramma's nose. this is bryson's nose. can you say nose?" and "aww baby brother. can you say zane? zane?". you can see when a word finally makes sense to them and they associate that sound with this object.
it's not just voice either. have you seen the programs that teach very young babies sign language? they learn the hand gestures are associated with certain objects...and they still learn their home language too. you can always tell a child who's parents talked to them and read to them...regardless of language.
i guess the same would apply to animals..tho we speak a different language. we learn our animals sounds for different moods and actions. and they learn our hand gestures and voice inflection to mean different requests. just as you can with a child, you can tell if an animal has been socialized.
so i guess what i'm saying is i don't think we have much cognitive thought before we start to learn language and before that it's instinct. and it's thru repetition with the senses that brings about language.
just a side note....isn't it just freaking awesome how much a child learns in the first 18 months of life? things that if we lose that ability as an adult take MUCH longer to relearn?
I don't mean to sound like an asshole but I don't think it is possible you remember that. Maybe you have been told the story and you think you remember it. Please convince me otherwise because I think it would be cool that someone could remember something from such a young age.
Pensacola '94
New Orleans '95
Birmingham '98
New Orleans '00
New Orleans '03
Tampa '08
New Orleans '10 - Jazzfest
New Orleans '16 - Jazzfest
Fenway Park '18
St. Louis '22
Actually regression therapy more often implants memories than it does bring out old memories. The subjects realize after discontinuing therapy that the memories were in-fact false. Thousands of people were convicted of child abuse following the big craze of recovered memory therapy in the 1980's, since then most have been released. Currently the insurance companies charge a lot more for psychiatrists performing recovery therapy for this reason and few therapists are in practice today.
The Royal College of Psychiatrists summarized their position as:
"Psychiatrists are advised to avoid engaging in any "memory recovery techniques" which are based upon the expectation of past sexual abuse of which the patient has no memory. Such...techniques may include drug-mediated interviews ["truth serum"], hypnosis, regression therapies, guided imagery, "body memories," literal dream interpretation, and journaling. There is no evidence that the use of consciousness-altering techniques, such as drug-mediated interviews or hypnosis, can reveal or accurately elaborate factual information about any past experiences, including sexual abuse."
It's fascinating. Equally as fascinating is the foundation we adults take for granted. When we speak and these words stream out of our mouths, or when we think, perform routine tasks. All of these things are based on a massive foundation of learned behavior.
Whoa...that's cool. I did not know that. I can definitely see how it could be possible to implant information deeply in such a suggestive open state of mind.
I'm glad I read that.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
this is fascinating, thanks for the thread.
however, i dont think all adults take all such things for granted. some folks tend to live on foundations of learning-behavior, as opposed to learned-behavior.
to dust i guess,
forgotten and absorbed into the earth below,..
why dont you copy some of this shit down and write another song ,
cause you lost the fire after your second million,covering a WHO song
you have lost it
"Perhaps our brains (as they are essentially sponges at that early age) can retain sequences of sounds like an vague echo which we later can apply language to and understand."
This could be reality for some people. Some have photographic memories. Maybe some can apply it to aural (sound pattern) recollection rather than visual.
I suggest it's definitely possible to remember, and understand later on what was said around you before you knew how to speak.
My long term memory is extremely acute. I can look at all my grade school pictures and name everyone in my classes by first and last name, also every teacher I've ever had, and every subject they taught me back to grade 1. That's how I happen to remember that one aspect of school. I have my visa card with expiry, bank card, social insurance number all memorized. I work on differernt companies networks. For one I keep about 20 users passwords memorized. For another client about a dozen. Phone numbers is another plus.
I don't try or a make a point of remembering. I just seem to remember things that are of notable interest.
I think if you are musically inclined it makes a big difference.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
how so?
[i mean: what is the correlation between music and memory (learning, knowing) that you perceive?]
to dust i guess,
forgotten and absorbed into the earth below,..
For me I think, I know it's a bit of a stretch, but I am very good at discerning sequences and patterns and I have a perfect sense of pitch. These what I consider or classify under "natural gifts" or" god given" talents of which everyone has in one form or another. I'm thinking we probably associate with the rhythm or tonality of language even in the womb. It's a hypothesis, hard to explain, but if you take the words out of a sentence or letters out of a word and just pronounce the syllables and tones you can still discern a fair amount of what's being said. Also if the words or phrases are repeated and from the same person (mother)....
I'm still not 100% about my experience. I may have convinced myself in a dream sometime along the way.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
In pictures.
The prenatal environment is the stage of much learning. It's taken somewhat exagerated though. For example the Mozart effect, playing Mozart for a child in the whom was supposed to make them more intelligent. In-fact it does not, the original studies were performed on adults, and it was assumed to have the same effect on children. However, the child's brain is still developing, while the stimulus is good and likely relates to speed of development, the brain region music correlates with, Wernicke's area is separate than language, Broca's area. Various stimuli will have effects on different brain regions, I'd be skeptical of making a connection between music and memory. Although, it's possible that repeatedly hearing the same music, seeing the same pictures or what-not is responsible for heightened memory. My long term memory is also good, but names and dates are a problem for me. I'm more likely to remember images, I can remember a license plate when I was a child, I can see it clearly. I have all of my personal numbers (SIN, Bank #, etc..) memorized but I can't always say them or write them, I just type them in 2 seconds flat without conscious thought. I am not musically inclined, but I was born in the 80's, so that's probably why.
I never fully subscribed to that philosophy on classical music either. I think it could provide for a greater sense of development in the imagination or curiosity areas of the brain, due to the variety of instruments used, and the delivery.
It probably can instill a greater sense of well being if tracks are chosen for a quiet soothing melodic effect, but it I don't think classical music goes so far as to develop any higher analytical skills
.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
yeah im a bit skeptical about this theory too, which is why i was curious about your comments. it is interesting to ponder if, and to what degree, reading has any effects upon child-development. seems repeatedly hearing the many common sounds of language could easily assist in the transition to applying such sounds with meanings and inferring comprehension likewise....?
to dust i guess,
forgotten and absorbed into the earth below,..
I think it all goes back to synapto/neuro-genesis.
no, i dont remember life before language. my earliest memories are when i was 3/4 years old.
have no idea cause i cant remember pre-language.
now, i think in colloquial australian english.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say