The liberal agenda does hate America, and if you fact check the liberal mouthpieces, you will find what is really sinister about the modern liberal agenda. They lie, stating the opposite of fact as fact.
So you what you believe is that anybody who criticizes the U.S Government is clearly in cahoots with the 'evil-doers' and wishes for an Islamo-fascist, terrorist dark ages to descend upon the Western world?
The reason we were attacked, from what I can see, is an Arab fascism driven to see a world Muslim theocracy, a new dark ages.The modern liberalist intellectuals lie out their ass, bold faced lies, in order to pursue a globalist agenda. but whatever.
Does anyone remember when all the pundits were saying that OBL et al were just using the Palestinian cause??
and then
terror experts from Rand etc said in fact OBL had been concerned w/ cause since highschool and that his Dad owned a home in Jerusalem that was seized by Israelis in '67
Steve Coll says it stands today but lived in by Israelis!!!!
The roman empire, the british empire, the ottoman empire, nazi germany..
just to name a few, there, MUtiny! All far more imperialistic than the US, if we're ranking superpowers. I could go on, but you can crack a book yourself.
As far as this "wisdom" piece, it's kind of a wanderiing piece that I'm not sure argues the point of the Heritage speaker per se. I could dissect it, but I'll leave it to the comments on the pages of the video.
The Heritage speaker proposes a concise argument, I'm not sure how the "wisom" piece rebuts that argument.
I guess you totally missed the point. You called liberals liars, who lie out of their asses and state the opposite as fact.
I dare you to find a lie, or the opposite stated as fact. Arundhati Roy is an exceptional writer and thinker, but she's not an exception.
One great difference between her text is that it's based on reality. The examples she states are historical events, that show America's (Britain's, Europe's, India's...) darker side. A side the heritage speaker chooses to ignore.
So, do you think the US is completely clean? Flawless? That's its involvement in the Middle East such as its support to Israel hasn't contributed to the growing resentment to the States?
Do you honestly think that people who say that after causing decades of terror around the world, it's not so surprising that the US got attacked?
Can you tell me why the neo-cons lied to the American people to get them into war?
Anyway, you said that liberal thinking is inherently evil. What exactly do you think is so evil about it? Is it considering world history and context of events? Is it the fact that they dare to be critical of their own states and point out where it went wrong?
Also, do you think the neo-cons are any different? I can find plenty of examples of liar, stating the opposite as fact etc. Isn't neo-con mindset the opposite of this dangerous 'thinking'.
They state the opposite as fact, they lie out of their asses, they only see one side of the story...
I guess you totally missed the point. You called liberals liars, who lie out of their asses and state the opposite as fact.
I dare you to find a lie, or the opposite stated as fact. Arundhati Roy is an exceptional writer and thinker, but she's not an exception.
One great difference between her text is that it's based on reality. The examples she states are historical events, that show America's (Britain's, Europe's, India's...) darker side. A side the heritage speaker chooses to ignore.
So, do you think the US is completely clean? Flawless? That's its involvement in the Middle East such as its support to Israel hasn't contributed to the growing resentment to the States?
Do you honestly think that people who say that after causing decades of terror around the world, it's not so surprising that the US got attacked?
Can you tell me why the neo-cons lied to the American people to get them into war?
Anyway, you said that liberal thinking is inherently evil. What exactly do you think is so evil about it? Is it considering world history and context of events? Is it the fact that they dare to be critical of their own states and point out where it went wrong?
Also, do you think the neo-cons are any different? I can find plenty of examples of liar, stating the opposite as fact etc. Isn't neo-con mindset the opposite of this dangerous 'thinking'.
They state the opposite as fact, they lie out of their asses, they only see one side of the story...
I Arundhati Roy
'and I can't imagine why you wouldn't welcome any change, my brother'
'How a culture can forget its plan of yesterday
and you swear it's not a trend
it doesn't matter anyway
there's no need to talk as friends
nothing news everyday
all the kids will eat it up
if it's packaged properly'
Comments
So you what you believe is that anybody who criticizes the U.S Government is clearly in cahoots with the 'evil-doers' and wishes for an Islamo-fascist, terrorist dark ages to descend upon the Western world?
No, no.....noooo!
Whatever! :rolleyes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz7_3n7xyDg
and then
terror experts from Rand etc said in fact OBL had been concerned w/ cause since highschool and that his Dad owned a home in Jerusalem that was seized by Israelis in '67
Steve Coll says it stands today but lived in by Israelis!!!!
Try again!!
peace
I guess you totally missed the point. You called liberals liars, who lie out of their asses and state the opposite as fact.
I dare you to find a lie, or the opposite stated as fact. Arundhati Roy is an exceptional writer and thinker, but she's not an exception.
One great difference between her text is that it's based on reality. The examples she states are historical events, that show America's (Britain's, Europe's, India's...) darker side. A side the heritage speaker chooses to ignore.
So, do you think the US is completely clean? Flawless? That's its involvement in the Middle East such as its support to Israel hasn't contributed to the growing resentment to the States?
Do you honestly think that people who say that after causing decades of terror around the world, it's not so surprising that the US got attacked?
Can you tell me why the neo-cons lied to the American people to get them into war?
Anyway, you said that liberal thinking is inherently evil. What exactly do you think is so evil about it? Is it considering world history and context of events? Is it the fact that they dare to be critical of their own states and point out where it went wrong?
Also, do you think the neo-cons are any different? I can find plenty of examples of liar, stating the opposite as fact etc. Isn't neo-con mindset the opposite of this dangerous 'thinking'.
They state the opposite as fact, they lie out of their asses, they only see one side of the story...
naděje umírá poslední
I
'How a culture can forget its plan of yesterday
and you swear it's not a trend
it doesn't matter anyway
there's no need to talk as friends
nothing news everyday
all the kids will eat it up
if it's packaged properly'