Home› A Moving Train

Say No to the North American Union

angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
edited February 2008 in A Moving Train
I received these two emails within the past few days, and I'd like to pass them on:

Toronto Protests for SPP Referendum!
Tagline: Stop the North American Union Now!! Its up to you!
Host: Anyone who thinks sovereign democratic nations matter!
Type: Causes - Protest
Time and Place Date: Saturday, February 16, 2008
Time: 1:00pm - 4:00pm
Location: Ontario Court s (361 University) March to Queen's Park for Speakers & Music
Street: University Avenue
City/Town: Toronto, ON

Contact Info Email: torontosppprotest@live.ca


This event is part of a NATIONWIDE CALL TO ACTION.

On February 16 (the day after Flag Day), Concerned Canadians from all over this great nation will be heard loud and clear as we demand a Referendum of the People on the Security & Prosperity Partnership (SPP). This was an agreement signed initially by the Liberals, then the Conservatives together with the US and Mexico with NO discussion or debate by the People's representatives! It is leading us to a North American Union. But the complicit mainstream media will never speak of it. Our sovereignty is in great peril. So join us to make the Toronto protest something that will be heard all the way in Ottawa !

STOP THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION NOW!!!!

Its your future...if you don't take action, who will?

****************************
NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CAP INITIATIVE. ALL ARE WELCOME IF THEY AGREE THAT WE NEED A REFERENDUM AND EVERYTHING MUST BE HALTED UNTIL THAT HAPPENS.




******************************




UPDATE ON PETITION! AS AT FEBRUARY 1 WE HAVE 7728 SIGNATURES!! KEEP 'EM COMING AND THANKS!!!

Urgent! Canadian Action Party has had a Petition posted on its website demanding a Referendum on the SPP since beginning November. To date we have just over 5,400 signatures. We need to get to 10,000 by February 16. Please, if you haven't signed, please add your voice to those Canadians who have already said NO NO NO - THE DEMISE OF CANADA IS NOT NEGOTIABLE, DISCUSSABLE, OR DEBATABLE !!!!!!!!! Its not necessary that you be a member of Canadian Action Party, or even support it to sign. This is not about which political stripe you wear, its about saving our sovereignty.

Read the petition:
http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/petition1.html

Sign it now!!
http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/petition2.html

PRINTABLE PETITION - GREAT FOR HANDOUTS AT THE PROTEST!
http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/_Library/docs/Print_this_Petition.pdf
"The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    this is similar to the european union? that seems to be working out?? I have to study more about it before I make a decision on good or bad
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I have to study more about it before I make a decision on good or bad
    Definitely, jlew, it's important that each individual do their own reseach and decide based on their own personal purposes. The key, here, is that each individual is aware and informed, and that all processes are up for discussion, debate and understanding.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • DriftingByTheStormDriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    jlew24asu wrote:
    this is similar to the european union? that seems to be working out?? I have to study more about it before I make a decision on good or bad

    This would erode the US Constitution, placing it INFERIOR to INTERNATIONAL law.

    :(

    Please watch this.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    showing me an alex jones video is only going to make me agree with the union. but my question is, how is this different from the European union?
  • DriftingByTheStormDriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    jlew24asu wrote:
    showing me an alex jones video is only going to make me agree with the union. but my question is, how is this different from the European union?

    thats an ignorant response.

    Watch the movie. If you subtract out the 25% that is theorizing on how it plays out in the future, it is 75% unabashed current & historical fact.

    It would probably be no different than the EU. Like i said, your bill of rights will be gone. States rights will be gone.
    The question is wether the pyramid scheme of power is a good one.
    You like the idea of state & national laws being ruled obsolete in the face of the "Law of the Union" ... in a INTERNATIONAL COURT\TRIBUNAL? This is what you will have. We will have to give up all our constitutional freedoms to some international judges. Selected from WAY HIGH UP ... ass kissers to the trillionaires.

    Do you want the super-elite to be able to divide the world in to 4 "unions" -- NAU, EU, Asian-Pacific Union, and an African Union?

    Then they have 4 highly centralized governments and MASSIVE control ... and probably only 2 or 3 central banks necessary ... and ONE giant one ... the WORLD bank ...

    From there it is a SMALL SMALL STEP to WORLD GOVERNMENT.

    You like world govenrment Jlew?

    :(
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    ok driftin, i'll stand with you and angelica on the picket lines :)
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    jlew24asu wrote:
    ok driftin, i'll stand with you and angelica on the picket lines :)
    Cool. See you in Toronto! :)
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • MasterFramerMasterFramer Posts: 2,268
    This can't be stopped, none of it can. It's all so fucking depressing.

    I thought Bush had already signed off on this.
    10.31.93 / 10.1.94 / 6.24.95 / 11.4.95 / 10.19-20.96 / 7.16.98 / 7.21.98 / 10.31.00 /8.4.01 Nader Rally/ 10.21.01 / 12.8-9.02 / 6.01.03 / 9.1.05 / 7.15-16,18.06 / 7.20.06 / 7.22-23.06 / Lolla 07
  • NevermindNevermind Posts: 1,006
    It will be stopped. History proves that. Even if we lose 80% or more of the population. Whoever thinks we havent been in this situation before is a fool. We will rebuild and we will evolve from it. 46 and 2 is just a head of us.
  • DriftingByTheStormDriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    Nevermind wrote:
    It will be stopped. History proves that. Even if we lose 80% or more of the population. Whoever thinks we havent been in this situation before is a fool. We will rebuild and we will evolve from it. 46 and 2 is just a head of us.

    Sadly, a good many of the NWOs aims are well meaning ... but the means to their ends are abhorrent.

    It's like Arron Russo said of his conversations with Nick Rockefeller when Alex Jones interviewed him. He said, "Its not that I don't agree that the world is overpopulated. I just don't think I am the one who should have the power to decide the fate of the rest of humanity. I am not god." ...

    That is the basic difference between modern day "good" and "evil" when we are talking about liberty vs. the powers that be. "They" have the brains, the money, the resources, and the "answers", and they think that means they should have the control to implement the answers how THEY see fit.

    "We" say, it is OUR right to decide how the course of human history plays out. You are not my master, and i am not your slave. And i will not surrender my natural rights to you just so you can play savior of the world by starving three quarters of humanity and regrowing forests for YOUR children, while killing everyone elses!

    You know what really got me in AJ's Endgame?
    When i saw Rockefeller roll up to Bilderberg in a SUV with a "This Vehicle Runs on ETHANOL" sticker on the back windshield.

    I've been trying to figure out why the people with the brains and control would ever promote such a STUPID STUPID STUPID idea as Ethanol. Most scientists recognize that it is just raising the price of a food staple, putting a bigger strain on the water supply, and consuming more energy than it saves! WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT?

    TO STARVE THE PEOPLE ... they are using democracy against us! Make the idiots think it is saving the world, then subisidize the fuck out of it so that farmers will never agree to give up ethanol as a policy, because it makes them easy money, and then watch as the water and food supply goes down the gas tank! And there was no coercision used (well, not that anyone ever really saw anyhow)!

    That is fucking brilliant!
    It is diabolic evil, but sheer brillance!
    :mad:

    PS - Jane's Addiction "Classic Girl" is on VH1 Classics.
    FUCK YEAH!
    :D:D:D
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • Blind3Blind3 Posts: 1,149
    Sadly , the NAU wouldn't be the first time US sovereignty was handed to a world body. Article VI of the US Constitution says: The Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land;and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

    That said, I don't think the framers envisioned the UN Treaty. I have a copy of the UN Charter. It is mindblowing.

    Is the UN Treaty not a treaty entered into? One which the US is only too happy to parrot in order to push sanctions against the enemy of the hour..i.e. Iran, Iraq, North Korea, etc..

    So much for George Washington's "Avoid foreign entanglements".
    "Buy the ticket,take the ride"
    Dr. Hunter S. Thompson

    "If I wanted you to understand, I would have explained it better"
    Johan Cruijff
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    I'll say no. I'm anti-union in every sense of the word.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
Sign In or Register to comment.