Not SHOULD but *WILL* he be impeached?

2»

Comments

  • Gary CarterGary Carter Posts: 14,067
    No. Terrorists are killing our brave men & women, not President Bush.



    yes it cause bush put them there to fight a senseless war.where are those wmds huh please tell me and i thought the war was over too.the mans a dickhead and should be impeached for war crimes.yes the ass will be impeached
    Ron: I just don't feel like going out tonight
    Sammi: Wanna just break up?

  • zstillings wrote:
    Political education by bumper stickers and slogans is definitely a good idea.

    it's not a bumper sticker it's the fucking truth....Clinton got impeached because he got a fucking blow job. Like he was the only president that ever got a blow job in office before? Fuck! Marilyn was doing both Kennedy brothers.

    Bush has done so pretty messed up things but I highly doubt he will be impeached, I do not want him to be impeached. I agree with the other's person comment that 2 presidents in a row to go through that, would show a very bad sign to the world. He's only got 2 years left. I am just counting the days when that bastard is gone.

    I do not think the democrats are the answer to all our problems. But what I do think is that this election sent a pretty clear message to Washington that the American people are tried of the bullshit. Tired of the lies. Tired of a war that should had never started. To me, that's what took place on Tuesday, it was to send a very clear and loud message to Washington and it worked!

    I do not think I have smiled this much during an election period for a long long time. I am still chuckling just thinking about how Bush must had felt Wednesday.
    Let's Go Red Sox!
  • JaneNYJaneNY Posts: 4,438
    I don't think he will be. If the democrats are smart, they'll focus on the issues that are important to the country and that have been neglected - healthcare, wage issues, education, better iraq strategies (and I have NO idea what that would be at this point). It would be wasteful to squander this victory by focusing energy on just impeachment when there's so much that needs attention. I guess that's sliding back into *should* rather than *will*. No I don't think he will be. I think the democrats (of which I am one) are smarter than that.
    R.i.p. Rigoberto Alpizar.
    R.i.p. My Dad - May 28, 2007
    R.i.p. Black Tail (cat) - Sept. 20, 2008
  • floyd1975floyd1975 Posts: 1,350
    momofglynn wrote:
    it's not a bumper sticker it's the fucking truth....Clinton got impeached because he got a fucking blow job.

    He was not impeached because of a blow job. To say that he was is either purposely misleading or ignoring your "fucking truth" that you seem to think you are touting.
  • BogoENBogoEN Posts: 65
    zstillings wrote:
    He was not impeached because of a blow job. To say that he was is either purposely misleading or ignoring your "fucking truth" that you seem to think you are touting.

    Yes, you are right-he was impeached because he lied under oath. Certainly a bad choice. But it's hard not to see, even from a nonpartisan perspective, that Republicans took advantage of their majority and Clinton's mistakes as revenge for taking the White House. Honestly, should a President have been removed from power because he denied that he had oral sex with a woman? Even if it was under oath. No president should be REMOVED for that, certainly criticized and reprimanded, but not removed. It was a political coup.
    "Winded is the sailor, drifting by the storm, wounded is the organ he left all bloodied on the shore...the smallest oceans still get Big Big waves..."

    Postive thinking is the key, Postive doing is the door...
  • floyd1975floyd1975 Posts: 1,350
    BogoEN wrote:
    Yes, you are right-he was impeached because he lied under oath. Certainly a bad choice. But it's hard not to see, even from a nonpartisan perspective, that Republicans took advantage of their majority and Clinton's mistakes as revenge for taking the White House. Honestly, should a President have been removed from power because he denied that he had oral sex with a woman? Even if it was under oath. No president should be REMOVED for that, certainly criticized and reprimanded, but not removed. It was a political coup.

    I don't think Clinton should have been impeached. I also thing that the impeachment hearings were a huge waste of time and money. I do, however, think that "Clinton was impeached for a blow-job" is juvenile bumper sticker logic.
  • No is my answer to the thread.



    for my comments on the other thing being debated here, please refer to zstillings posts.
  • callencallen Posts: 6,388
    jlew24asu wrote:
    sadly he's not. there are about 7-10 on this board who firmly believe the bush, rummy, cheney, wolfowitz or combination thereof, sat at starbucks and came up with the plan and carried it out on 9/11. makes me sick.

    its part of the problem with freedom. we have to tolerated garbage like that.

    don't let it make you sick...there are folks on the fringe....but they are few and far between.....I know of none of my lib friends that believes this....we feel Bush and croanies are to incompetent to pull something like this off. (-:
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
Sign In or Register to comment.