An example of why I don't support my religion anymore

DerrickDerrick Posts: 475
edited November 2006 in A Moving Train
Here is an example of why I don't support my religion anymore: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2006/08/24/bishop-clinton.html

Bill Clinton is in my town today to do a fundraiser speech for a center for a centre that supports victims of domestic abuse. The area Catholic Archbishop has publicly denouced it and called for a boycott. Catholic leaders are clearly not about forgiveness nor acceptance. And they cannot see past their own self righteousness to see the good someone is doing.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Derrick wrote:
    Here is an example of why I don't support my religion anymore: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2006/08/24/bishop-clinton.html

    Bill Clinton is in my town today to do a fundraiser speech for a center for a centre that supports victims of domestic abuse. The area Catholic Archbishop has publicly denouced it and called for a boycott. Catholic leaders are clearly not about forgiveness nor acceptance. And they cannot see past their own self righteousness to see the good someone is doing.

    Clinton's support for abortion, his marital infidelity and promotion of condom use to prevent the spread of AIDS go against Catholic Church doctrine, said Bergie.



    its fine if you disagree but he clearly stated why. it has nothing to do with the reason for the event. it has to do with clinton. meaning the bishop would support the event if there was another speaker.
  • That is beyond dumb. I really think that a lot of the religions today forget that Jesus was about love, peace, and helping those less fortunate than you.
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    jlew24asu wrote:
    Clinton's support for abortion, his marital infidelity and promotion of condom use to prevent the spread of AIDS go against Catholic Church doctrine, said Bergie.



    its fine if you disagree but he clearly stated why. it has nothing to do with the reason for the event. it has to do with clinton. meaning the bishop would support the event if there was another speaker.
    I wonder if the bishop would take the same position if Bush were to show up, seeing as the Catholic church is also opposed to the death penalty and the war in Iraq.

    It just shows who the bigger man is ... Clinton was willing to set aside his obvious differences with the church in order to do some good, and the bishop wasn't.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • DerrickDerrick Posts: 475
    Right, but the subject is domestic violence. (EDIT: this was in response to jlew)
  • miller8966miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    That is beyond dumb. I really think that a lot of the religions today forget that Jesus was about love, peace, and helping those less fortunate than you.

    people seem to forget that jesus agreed with many of the old testament laws.
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • miller8966 wrote:
    people seem to forget that jesus agreed with many of the old testament laws.

    Care to expand on that statement?
  • jesus believed in anything that somone wanted him to believe in, of course.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    hippiemom wrote:
    I wonder if the bishop would take the same position if Bush were to show up, seeing as the Catholic church is also opposed to the death penalty and the war in Iraq.

    It just shows who the bigger man is ... Clinton was willing to set aside his obvious differences with the church in order to do some good, and the bishop wasn't.


    of course the church is against the war in iraq. i think the bishop was wrong in calling for a boycott. he should have acknowledged it was for a good cause.
  • DerrickDerrick Posts: 475
    jlew24asu wrote:
    i think the bishop was wrong in calling for a boycott. he should have acknowledged it was for a good cause.

    I agree fully.
Sign In or Register to comment.