Home› A Moving Train

How would you feel about a 4-day work week?

DerrickDerrick Posts: 475
edited March 2007 in A Moving Train
I personally resent that the norm is that we spend 5/7 days of the bulk of our prime years at work.

What are your pros/cons to the 32 hour work week?
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    I'm all in favor. I don't even care about cutting the hours ... I'd much prefer to work 4 longer days and have an extra day when I don't have to be here at all.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Derrick wrote:
    I personally resent that the norm is that we spend 5/7 days of the bulk of our prime years at work.

    What are your pros/cons to the 32 hour work week?

    More overtime.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • floyd1975floyd1975 Posts: 1,350
    I think I worked 32 hours one week in 1998. Haven't gone below 45 since unless I was on vacation.
  • mca47mca47 Posts: 13,297
    Derrick wrote:
    I personally resent that the norm is that we spend 5/7 days of the bulk of our prime years at work.

    What are your pros/cons to the 32 hour work week?

    If I could I'd work 4, 10 hour days instead of 5, 8 hour days.

    I can't do less hours in my line of work. I'm simply too busy.
  • LikeAnOceanLikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    It's cool if you get paid SALARY!!!

    Don't forget about the people working 80 hours a week earning minimum wage. I wonder how they would feel about a 32 hour work week.

    I work hourly. My buddy who's salary called me on a Friday afternoon and was like, "why won't your boss let you off early on Friday?" I was like, "Because I have bills to pay and wouldn't even consider asking." ..of course I get over-time pay and he doesn't.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    40 hours is hardly work.
  • RockinInCanadaRockinInCanada Posts: 2,016
    I refuse to work anything over 40 hours/week, I will not work for the man for free....just so you people know since I am considered a "professional" I am not allowed o/t and am on salary.....

    As for four days a week I am all for it.....
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    as an employee sure, i'm all for it. business owners might feel differently
  • RockinInCanadaRockinInCanada Posts: 2,016
    jlew24asu wrote:
    as an employee sure, i'm all for it. business owners might feel differently

    lol...pretty safe to say that you could drop might and replace with will from your comment....:)
  • moeaholicmoeaholic Posts: 535
    right out of high school i had a job that ran 10 hour shifts 4 days a week. i'd love to go back to that. 3 day weekend every week? why not? as for working 4 days a week, 8 hours a day.....no way. i'm accustomed to a 40 hour paycheck every week. my wife and i have a schedule with the bills. if i lost 32 hours a month, it'd fuck things up.
    "PC Load Letter?! What the fuck does that mean?"
    ~Michael Bolton
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    Derrick wrote:
    I personally resent that the norm is that we spend 5/7 days of the bulk of our prime years at work.

    What are your pros/cons to the 32 hour work week?
    Then you should look for a job that allows you to work less hours. You'd probably make less but it sounds like to me that the additional time off is more important to you than the additional money.

    I know I'd sure resent it if someone legislated a 20% reduction in my pay by legislating a 32 hr work week.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    I would like to go to 4 - 10 hour days.... hell, i would like to go down to 40 hrs every week.

    I worked for a year loading baggage for an airline. Everyone swapped shifts, and the ideal schedule if you could pull it off was 2 doubles (16 hours) and a regular 8 hour day. You would get your full 40 hours and have 4 days off every week.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • he still standshe still stands Posts: 2,835
    "... ociologists make short shrift of "work ethic" as a useful sociological concept because to have a "work ethic" in excess of management's control doesn't appear rational in any mature industry where the employee can't rationally hope to become more than a manager whose fate still depends on the owner's decisions. Sociology prefers to renarrate excess work ethic as a form of alienation from truer needs for family and community connections, and twentieth century "critical theory" sees the "work ethic" as a unilateral demand which evolved from a mass confusion between Max Weber's "Protestant work ethic" of company founders, and a sociologically uninteresting phenomenon (rare enough to not register on a mass radar screen) which in fact produces deviance (of interest to the sociologist) in the form of addiction and family neglect

    .... Many white collar employees, in a rational reaction to a demand for a "work ethic" involving the sacrifice of unpaid hours, cultivate a rhetorical "work ethic" consisting of external obeisance to absolute management control while producing little."

    From wikipedia
    Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
  • MilestoneMilestone Posts: 1,140
    I used to work 4 10 hour shifts. Loved it! 3 days off refreshed me soooooo much more than a 2 day weekend.

    However, I found that I slacked at work the last 2 hours of each night. And, I missed dinner with my wife and kid every night.

    Two sides to every coin.
    11-2-2000 Portland. 12-8-2002 Seattle. 4-18-2003 Nashville. 5-30-2003 Vancouver. 10-25-2003 Bridge School. 9-2-2005 Vancouver.
    7-6-2006 Las Vegas. 7-20-2006 Portland. 7-22-2006 Gorge. 9-21-2009 Seattle. 9-22-2009 Seattle. 9-26-2009 Ridgefield. 9-25-2011 Vancouver.
    11-29-2013 Portland. 10-16-2014 Detroit. 8-8-2018 Seattle. 8-10-2018 Seattle. 8-13-2018 Missoula.  5-10-2024 Portland.  5-30-2024 Seattle.
  • MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,672
    How about siesta? That would be cool.
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    I'm all for a 4 day work week. I work 9+ hours, 5/d/week and by the time it's Friday afternoon, I'm absolutely exhausted from the stress of working so much. I'm sure having to take care of a toddler doesn't make it easier, but the quality of life just isn't there when you work so much, unless you're married to your job.

    I used to work 12 hour shifts 3 days/wk, then 4 days/wk every other week. So, I'd have 4 days off one week, then 3 days off the next, if I didn't do overtime. The work hours were draining, but the days off were SOOO worth it!
  • justamjustam Posts: 21,412
    Derrick wrote:
    I personally resent that the norm is that we spend 5/7 days of the bulk of our prime years at work.

    What are your pros/cons to the 32 hour work week?

    I think a four day work week would help most families if they could earn the same amount of money. They'd have more time to care for their children and homes.

    I look at most of the families where both parents work and it's rush, rush, rush, cram-it-in, not-enough-hours-in-the-day. An extra day to take care of domestic things would be good I think. :)
    &&&&&&&&&&&&&&
  • McCready00McCready00 Posts: 371
    Here in Québec, we tried 4 years ago to let the mother with a new-borned baby to work only 4 days a week. But the government who thought about it has not been elected. I'm glad to leave here specialy for the avant-garde ideas we often have. Our new electricity created with eoliens is getting ready good too.
    -"it's times like these you have to ask yourself, "what would mike mccready do"
  • scw156scw156 Posts: 442
    my girlfriend is a nurse and works three 12 hour shifts and gets paid for 40 hours... she can make her own schedule for the most part too (as long as she gets her 3 shifts in for the week) so she can have 8 days off in a row if she fiddles with her schedule. yay for her.

    as for me, i just graduated college and am having the darnedest time finding a job... i wish i had the ability to complain about how many hours i work.


    openings? anyone? anyone?
    The Sentence Below Is True
    The Sentence Above Is False
  • Sludge FactorySludge Factory Posts: 976
    justam wrote:
    I think a four day work week would help most families if they could earn the same amount of money. They'd have more time to care for their children and homes.

    I look at most of the families where both parents work and it's rush, rush, rush, cram-it-in, not-enough-hours-in-the-day. An extra day to take care of domestic things would be good I think. :)

    I like this idea and I wish that was the way things were. Time is definitely stretched thin with the rush mentality of today's society.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    Derrick wrote:
    I personally resent that the norm is that we spend 5/7 days of the bulk of our prime years at work.

    What are your pros/cons to the 32 hour work week?

    What would you rather be doing?
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • Dustin51Dustin51 Posts: 222
    mca47 wrote:
    If I could I'd work 4, 10 hour days instead of 5, 8 hour days.

    I can't do less hours in my line of work. I'm simply too busy.

    Yeah, I'd be willing to put in 4-10's. Some Government jobs allow that I believe.
    Be excellent to each other
  • sonicreducersonicreducer Posts: 713
    we should ask congress,...
    you're a real hooker. im gonna slap you in public.
    ~Ron Burgundy
  • LeilaMoonTurtleLeilaMoonTurtle Posts: 1,418
    that is my work week
    I work 3 or 4 long days
    the rest are MINE!


    hippiemom wrote:
    I'm all in favor. I don't even care about cutting the hours ... I'd much prefer to work 4 longer days and have an extra day when I don't have to be here at all.
    http://s278.photobucket.com/albums/kk103/Moonturltemoon/PJ MSG 6-24-08/

    Mihi cura futuri.

    The elements they speak to me.

    http://espn.go.com/espnradiostations/NewYork1050/gallery/35218855.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL3gQO1WxUk
    so cute they are
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Derrick wrote:
    I personally resent that the norm is that we spend 5/7 days of the bulk of our prime years at work.

    What are your pros/cons to the 32 hour work week?

    I agree. 2 days of rest isn't enough. I need 3 days to recover fully. 5 days of work out of seven is too much.
  • JenInTheBxJenInTheBx Posts: 293
    I'll let you guys know what I think about it when my schedule changes over in two weeks... :)

    My new schedule at work is going to be Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday from 8-7.. can't wait. However, I did put in for a promotion, which in all likelihood is going to give me some not so good hours (but a very good pay raise), so we'll see how long this lasts. :)
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    know1 wrote:
    What would you rather be doing?

    Living - which is the opposite of work.
  • MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,672
    MrBrian wrote:
    How about siesta? That would be cool.

    we need siesta.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    I would gladly pick a 4 day 10 hr a day work week over a 5 day 8 hr a day work week. I hardly get out on time as it is and usually end up working 9-10 hrs a day anyway.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • OutOfBreathOutOfBreath Posts: 1,804
    he still stands wrote:
    "... ociologists make short shrift of "work ethic" as a useful sociological concept because to have a "work ethic" in excess of management's control doesn't appear rational in any mature industry where the employee can't rationally hope to become more than a manager whose fate still depends on the owner's decisions. Sociology prefers to renarrate excess work ethic as a form of alienation from truer needs for family and community connections, and twentieth century "critical theory" sees the "work ethic" as a unilateral demand which evolved from a mass confusion between Max Weber's "Protestant work ethic" of company founders, and a sociologically uninteresting phenomenon (rare enough to not register on a mass radar screen) which in fact produces deviance (of interest to the sociologist) in the form of addiction and family neglect

    .... Many white collar employees, in a rational reaction to a demand for a "work ethic" involving the sacrifice of unpaid hours, cultivate a rhetorical "work ethic" consisting of external obeisance to absolute management control while producing little."

    From wikipedia
    That was a weird way of putting it... said the sociologist... ;)
    Could you link me the article?
    From my take right here based on this, I think the author presupposes a way way too unified field of sociology. And the way he uses the term sociology/sociologist it may seem he goes from a very distinct (and somewhat unusual) definition of the term.

    Peace
    Dan
    "YOU [humans] NEED TO BELIEVE IN THINGS THAT AREN'T TRUE. HOW ELSE CAN THEY BECOME?" - Death

    "Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 1965
Sign In or Register to comment.