How Good Are Experienced Presidents?
baraka
Posts: 1,268
Thought you guys might have fun with this. I ran across this page while doing some research and found it interesting. The article takes the Historical rankings of U.S. Presidents and correlates it with overall years experience.
http://electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Info/experience.html
http://electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Info/experience.html
The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance,
but the illusion of knowledge.
~Daniel Boorstin
Only a life lived for others is worth living.
~Albert Einstein
but the illusion of knowledge.
~Daniel Boorstin
Only a life lived for others is worth living.
~Albert Einstein
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
"Your pick disagrees with that of most historians, who see Lincoln as the greatest President ever"
actually, many, many historians see Lincoln as one of the worst.
such as whom? and for what reason? rather than just denounce, provide reasons to the contrary.
http://www.strike-the-root.com/52/herman/herman22.html
nevermind the fact that FDR also sent tons of Japanese Americans to internment camps, etc...
and yet these presidents are considered 'the greatest'...
I had to chuckle at this. I actually ran across the link in an 'off topic' forum in a Biology forum where I am a homework helper. We aren't much into science stuff there.
but the illusion of knowledge.
~Daniel Boorstin
Only a life lived for others is worth living.
~Albert Einstein
I have no doubt that there are groups of folks that would deem 'the greatest' as 'the worst'. I think the numbers are generalizing popular consensus among historians & the public. This is not to say there are not historians and others that disagree.
I also found this on the wiki link from that article. Seems that the rankings of liberals vs conservatives are not all that different. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_United_States_Presidents#Liberal_and_conservative_raters
but the illusion of knowledge.
~Daniel Boorstin
Only a life lived for others is worth living.
~Albert Einstein
What then is your definition of a "great" president?
FDR pulled this country out of the great depression and led the US through the majority of WWII. Yes the internment camps were a horrible injustice, but we are still reaping the benefits of many of the social programs that FDR created while in office. His popularity over such a long period of time alone, I think signifies his greatness.
Lincoln did take drastic steps in terms of imposing martial law during the Civil War, but he managed to reunite this country when half of our nation had split away. Have you noticed that we have stayed together since?
To be honest, I'm not sure what you want. Which of the thousands of books, articles, websites, interviews, etc. would convince you that the overwhelming majority of the country considers Lincoln one of our most famous and greatest presidents? I mean, what would convince you?
I think personal thoughts on Presidents are fine, but it's hard to dismiss the overwhelming public approval of Lincoln. I have a similar thing with Andrew Jackson; I think he's one of the worst Presidents in American history, but I do know that there are tons of people, maybe even a majority that think he was great.
that survey was done in 1982. i'd be very curious to see a more recent one. a lot has changed in that time.
Yeah, I would be curious as well. I think there would be shifts in the presidential rankings due to how we view history today and I think this view changes over time.
but the illusion of knowledge.
~Daniel Boorstin
Only a life lived for others is worth living.
~Albert Einstein
Lincoln did not get to unite the country....Boothe ruined that and screwed the South with his move. Andrew Johnson and the hawks got to milk the South for every dime, nickel and penny that they could over the next decade.
It appears that different historians use different criteria when determining the best & worst. But the same usual suspects seems to rise to the top or fall to the bottom.
As far as your comment, tybird, I read earlier about a historian that uses 2 criteria to determine the worst, one being 'damage done' and the other being something called the 'Kuklick yardstick'. That means a president is only as good as the opinion of the people he served. In other words viewing the presidency strictly from within its time.
In the same article, one conservative historian has the same opinion as you about Andrew Jackson, digster. He considered him bottom tier due to 'destroying the fiscal integrity of the US'.
but the illusion of knowledge.
~Daniel Boorstin
Only a life lived for others is worth living.
~Albert Einstein
im willing to bet anything that clinton and reagan would both be absurdly overrated by their respective wings. things in the last 20 years seem to have gotten so bitterly partisan and divisive that i bet those lists no longer look anything like each other. plus, the pc movement has probably rocked the boat. all the presidents had dirt that used to be overlooked. jackson, for instance, was high on both lists but his racism and war on native americans has tarnished that.