Options

War on terrorism fought with the wrong weapons?

MCGMCG Posts: 780
edited August 2006 in A Moving Train
Just before World War I, there were a number of terrorist attacks on the United States forces in the Philippines by Muslim extremists. So General Pershing captured 50 terrorists, and had them tied to posts for execution. He then had his men bring in two pigs and slaughter them in front of the, now horrified, terrorists.

Muslims detest pork, because they believe pigs are filthy animals. Some of them simply refuse to eat it, while others won't even touch pigs at all, nor any of their by-products. To them, eating or touching a pig, its meat, its blood, etc., is to be instantly barred from Paradise (and those virgins), and doomed to hell.

The soldiers then soaked their bullets in the pigs' blood, and proceeded to execute 49 of the terrorists by firing squad. The soldiers then dug a big hole, dumped in the terrorist's bodies, and covered them in pig blood, entrails, etc. They let the 50th man go.

And for the next 42 years, there was not a single Muslim extremist attack anywhere in the world.

http://home1.gte.net/jialpert/Politics/Pershing.htm

Can't say that I agree with the tactic completely, execution is barbaric, but it raises an interesting point. Muslim extremists (suicide bombers and the like) welcome death because they believe they will go directly to heaven. Would many would-be terrorists think twice before trying to carry out an attack if the ones that were caught were handled in a similar manner?
Which came first,
the bad idea or me befallen by it?
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Options
    MCG wrote:
    Muslim extremists (suicide bombers and the like) welcome death because they believe they will go directly to heaven. Would many would-be terrorists think twice before trying to carry out an attack if the ones that were caught were handled in a similar manner?

    Sure, many would think twice. But many would not, and do not. You don't fight terrorism with terrorism. In America, we execute murderers, and it has no relation to the murder rate going up or down. You fight crime with police work and the justice system...you look at your evidence, find a motive, capture the criminal, and reflect on the motive to see what can be done to decrease the motivation if possible.
  • Options
    MCGMCG Posts: 780
    Saturnal wrote:
    Sure, many would think twice. But many would not, and do not. You don't fight terrorism with terrorism. In America, we execute murderers, and it has no relation to the murder rate going up or down. You fight crime with police work and the justice system...you look at your evidence, find a motive, capture the criminal, and reflect on the motive to see what can be done to decrease the motivation if possible.

    Excellent point.
    Which came first,
    the bad idea or me befallen by it?
  • Options
    enharmonicenharmonic Posts: 1,926
    My personal belief is that the only way to defeat terrorism is with concentrated, repeated use of caramel apples.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caramel_apples

    An apple a day keeps the jihad away.
  • Options
    FinsburyParkCarrotsFinsburyParkCarrots Seattle, WA Posts: 12,223
    MCG wrote:

    And for the next 42 years, there was not a single Muslim extremist attack anywhere in the world.

    At all. :rolleyes:
  • Options
    AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    stupidity ... yup, the wrong weapon.
  • Options
    Oh, leave him alone, he's from Regina.........
Sign In or Register to comment.