Pakistan?

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jlew24asu wrote:

many countries shun the dollar. get over yourself.

wakey wakey sleepy head...

eyes wide shut

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gOZLSqmQDN-ZEM0MaLy1mhuH3N1g

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

wakey wakey sleepy head...

eyes wide shut

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gOZLSqmQDN-ZEM0MaLy1mhuH3N1g

thanks for posting this to prove my point...


"One can say with some assurance that in the next year the use of force by the United States is highly unlikely," Bolton told AFP on the sidelines of the Herzliya conference on the balance of Israel's national security.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jlew24asu wrote:

thanks for posting this to prove my point...


"One can say with some assurance that in the next year the use of force by the United States is highly unlikely," Bolton told AFP on the sidelines of the Herzliya conference on the balance of Israel's national security.

Unlikey....Oh....of course....then it's definitely settled.

you're laughable...

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Unlikey....Oh....of course....then it's definitely settled.

you're laughable...

I'm laughable? wow you have officially lost it. you are screaming that we are going to war with Iran and post an article will bolton saying its highly unlikely. but somehow you know different? get your shit together before you post an article. owning your ass gets easier by the day.

beachdweller

melodious wrote:

Has anyone noticed how mention of Iraq is becoming faded....With all the focus on the debates, I wonder what is going on behind the scenes? Does anyone else here realize how crucial Pakistan has become in the world stage?

If anything happens to this election, we could all be in for a blast similar to a comet or astroid hitting earth...

All, I can say is we better keep spreading positive seeds so that you can thrwart what may be on the horizon...peace...love...send it alll.....

Pakistan was far more dangerous than Iraq, Iran, and/or North Korea before Bush spewed his axis of exil rhetoric, anyone that paid attention to foreign policy knew this, which just shows how much bs the administration actions have been. If Suddam was still in power, he'd still be powerless, and we may have made great gains in Afghanistan and against the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

we don't need to spend a trillion dollars to fight an enemy without a country, we need strong coalitions, improved intelligence, and strategic strikes (air force/navy) and attack's (special ops (army, marines, navy)).

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jlew24asu wrote:

I'm laughable? wow you have officially lost it. you are screaming that we are going to war with Iran and post an article will bolton saying its highly unlikely. but somehow you know different? get your shit together before you post an article. owning your ass gets easier by the day.

Have you been paying attention to anything at all in the past 4 months?

I guess not...

I guessing the only thing you manage to own on a regular basis is probably a bic lighter, a pack of smokes, and an ipod nano...

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Have you been paying attention to anything at all in the past 4 months?

I guess not...

I guessing the only thing you manage to own on a regular basis is probably a bic lighter, a pack of smokes, and an ipod nano...

yes I have been paying attention and all it is, is tough talk between both sides. pity you can take it for what it is. and I dont smoke and hate apple anything.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jlew24asu wrote:

yes I have been paying attention and all it is, is tough talk between both sides. pity you can take it for what it is. and I dont smoke and hate apple anything.

Did you not even understand the article? Israel has to attack Iran because it is unlikely the US will. Bolton is putting across specific reasoning for attacking Iran.

Pardon me for asking, but do you actually possess thought?

You're ridiculous in your perception. Read the very next sentence after the one you prematurely ran up the flagpole. Again you say stuff totally out the realm of reality hoping to sway popular opinion, but it just makes you look foolish.

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Did you not even understand the article? Israel has to attack Iran because it is unlikely the US will. Bolton is putting across specific reasoning for attacking Iran.

Pardon me for asking, but do you actually possess thought?

You're ridiculous in your perception. Read the very next sentence after the one you prematurely ran up the flagpole. Again you say stuff totally out the realm of reality hoping to sway popular opinion, but it just makes you look foolish.

so now its Israel that is going to war with Iran? I thought it was bush. whatever fits your agenda I guess.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jlew24asu wrote:

so now its Israel that is going to war with Iran? I thought it was bush. whatever fits your agenda I guess.

Oh yeah two separate entities with completely separate agenda's all right..

nice grabbing at straws there....

pass over what you're toking...

Cosmo

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080122/ap_on_re_eu/europe_musharraf
...
"The 100,000 troops that we are using ... are not going around trying to locate Osama bin Laden and Zawahri, frankly," Musharraf told a conference at the French Institute for International Relations. "They are operating against terrorists, and in the process, if we get them, we will deal with them certainly."
...
He fails to mention that it is more than likely that many of the 100,000 troops looking for bin Laden would probably 'Thank' him.. than capture him. in a country where Usama is one of the most popular names for newborn boys... whoda thunk?
...
Again... remind me... WHY are we funnelling millions of tax dollars and weapons to this country?

RolandTD20Kdrummer

"How are nations ruled and led into war? Politicians lie to journalists and then believe those lies when they see them in print." - Austrian journalist Karl Kraus, explaining the causes of the First World War.

If war were in fact a business....

It's been the best war ever.
http://www.prwatch.org/tbwe/index.html

.

melodious

Cosmo wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080122/ap_on_re_eu/europe_musharraf
...
"The 100,000 troops that we are using ... are not going around trying to locate Osama bin Laden and Zawahri, frankly," Musharraf told a conference at the French Institute for International Relations. "They are operating against terrorists, and in the process, if we get them, we will deal with them certainly."
...
He fails to mention that it is more than likely that many of the 100,000 troops looking for bin Laden would probably 'Thank' him.. than capture him. in a country where Usama is one of the most popular names for newborn boys... whoda thunk?
...
Again... remind me... WHY are we funnelling millions of tax dollars and weapons to this country?

funny how osama never gets caught...i mean maybe he is a fallacy...and he's made up character for propaganda sake...according to a friend of mine, the reason we are so concerned is becasue of the nukes...

"they don't care if they destroy the world ....they will do it for their belief" ...a-symmetrical warfare is the term i think is used...

this is why looking at our own inner peace and kharmatic relationship with the universe is so important...the more postiive seeds we plant the more we have to ward of the bad "ju ju"....

RolandTD20Kdrummer

Check out the movie the hunting party...kinda weak movie, but it has it's moments, but it really drives home the reality of it all at the end.

If a few reporters could find "unfindable war criminals" and the CIA and everyone else "can't"...then the CIA aren't really looking now are they?

They pretend to look while the cash registers churn, and the strings from above pluck away.

The MIC is a business, and their product kills people, and they need to sell product just like any other business.

melodious

Your overview of this movie reminds me of our DEA as well. The government claims to be winning the war on drugs, by security and yet we keep having an influx of illicit substances entering into the country...

If the airports are secure, and the borders are too, then who the hell allows all the "junk" to enter into our country...

thanks for the reference to this movie...