impeachbush.org

stupidcorporatewhore
edited July 2007 in A Moving Train
Do I think they have the votes to do it?

nah, but I'm fed up and I need to have my voice heard.

if you're fed up too, go to a website that will register your opinion

impeachbush.org

all they need is a million votes and they can get the ball rolling

please help to at least make this part of the legacy of the worst presidency in US history.

the rest of you...

FLAME ON BITCHES!!
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • Do I think they have the votes to do it?

    nah, but I'm fed up and I need to have my voice heard.

    if you're fed up too, go to a website that will register your opinion

    impeachbush.org

    all they need is a million votes and they can get the ball rolling

    please help to at least make this part of the legacy of the worst presidency in US history.

    the rest of you...

    FLAME ON BITCHES!!

    dutifuly signed!
    :)
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • Anon
    Anon Posts: 11,175
    done and thanks for the link
  • DCGARDEN
    DCGARDEN Posts: 515
    Impeachment is usually brought up on some kind of legal action or precedent.

    What is your legal argument for impeachment?
    I'll keep taking punches
    Untill their will grows tired
  • DCGARDEN wrote:
    Impeachment is usually brought up on some kind of legal action or precedent.

    What is your legal argument for impeachment?

    you have to get a warrant to spy on your own people

    he didn't, he broke the law, period.

    sign the petition or get out of our way!
  • DCGARDEN
    DCGARDEN Posts: 515
    you have to get a warrant to spy on your own people

    he didn't, he broke the law, period.

    sign the petition or get out of our way!


    What are you twelve? Nevermind, don't answer that. I will get out of your way.
    I'll keep taking punches
    Untill their will grows tired
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    DCGARDEN wrote:
    What are you twelve? Nevermind, don't answer that. I will get out of your way.

    what he was saying is that the president authorized illegal warrantless searches...

    and he is right about that, whether he/she is 12 or 35
  • keeponrockin
    keeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    As much as I'd like this, I don't want Dick OFFICIALLY running the country.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • moeaholic
    moeaholic Posts: 535
    As much as I'd like this, I don't want Dick OFFICIALLY running the country.

    lol, says the man from canada.
    "PC Load Letter?! What the fuck does that mean?"
    ~Michael Bolton
  • Bu2
    Bu2 Posts: 1,693
    And I just added mine.

    Thanks for the link.
    Feels Good Inc.
  • The whole lot of them should be thrown in jail for butchering the constitution!
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,864
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • 915,208
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • DCGARDEN
    DCGARDEN Posts: 515
    I'll keep taking punches
    Untill their will grows tired
  • DCGARDEN wrote:
    What are you twelve? Nevermind, don't answer that. I will get out of your way.

    oops guess I should've said "bring em on", clearly that would have appealed to your sensabilities.

    since you are stooping to namecalling and not addressing my point I'll assume you don't refute it.
  • DCGARDEN
    DCGARDEN Posts: 515
    oops guess I should've said "bring em on", clearly that would have appealed to your sensabilities.

    since you are stooping to namecalling and not addressing my point I'll assume you don't refute it.


    Actually your assumption is wrong

    I did'nt name-call. I asked you a serious question and you gave me the reaction of a child. I merely wanted to find out if you were one.

    If I ask you for a legal argument for the impeachment of the President of the United States, and you respond by saying something along the lines of " He spied on his people, end of story " , you gave me a picture of a brat , with his arms folded, stomping his foot, unable to produce a sensible arguement.

    You followed up a later post with the case to be made and I thanked you for that.

    And I do refute it, by the way, but was only curious as to your reason.

    Peace to you
    I'll keep taking punches
    Untill their will grows tired
  • Bu2
    Bu2 Posts: 1,693
    1. Violating the United Nations Charter by launching an illegal "War of Aggression" against Iraq without cause, using fraud to sell the war to Congress and the public, misusing government funds to begin bombing without Congressional authorization, and subjecting our military personnel to unnecessary harm, debilitating injuries, and deaths.

    2. Violating U.S. and international law by authorizing the torture of thousands of captives, resulting in dozens of deaths, and keeping prisoners hidden from the International Committee of the Red Cross.

    3. Violating the Constitution by arbitrarily detaining Americans, legal residents, and non-Americans, without due process, without charge, and without access to counsel.

    4. Violating the Geneva Conventions by targeting civilians, journalists, hospitals, and ambulances, and using illegal weapons, including white phosphorous, depleted uranium, and a new type of napalm.

    5. Violating U.S. law and the Constitution through widespread wiretapping of the phone calls and emails of Americans without a warrant.

    6. Violating the Constitution by using "signing statements" to defy hundreds of laws passed by Congress.

    7. Violating U.S. and state law by obstructing honest elections in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006.

    8. Violating U.S. law by using paid propaganda and disinformation, selectively and misleadingly leaking classified information, and exposing the identity of a covert CIA operative working on sensitive WMD proliferation for political retribution.

    9. Subverting the Constitution and abusing Presidential power by asserting a "Unitary Executive Theory" giving unlimited powers to the President, by obstructing efforts by Congress and the Courts to review and restrict Presidential actions, and by promoting and signing legislation negating the Bill of Rights and the Writ of Habeas Corpus.
    Feels Good Inc.
  • Bu2
    Bu2 Posts: 1,693
    Oops. I hate to repeat myself, so I will edit this out and move on to the next topic...

    :)
    Feels Good Inc.
  • Rushlimbo
    Rushlimbo Posts: 832
    The White House is actually going to use this list of signees to eliminate those who want Bush gone. Cheney is an evil genius.
    War is Peace
    Freedom is Slavery
    Ignorance is Strength
  • Bu2
    Bu2 Posts: 1,693
    is now on a list somewhere in Cheney's vault, as we speak.

    Now, ask me if I give a damn.
    Feels Good Inc.
  • DCGARDEN wrote:
    And I do refute it, by the way, but was only curious as to your reason.

    please explain why. back up your arguement.

    If your opinion is that the president is above the law, I accept that though I disagree with it.

    In my view, any republican that thought being impeached for lying about a blow job was a good thing but not for massive death and destruction is a hypocrite.