McCain says Roe v. Wade should be overturned

SuzannePjamSuzannePjam Posts: 411
edited February 2007 in A Moving Train
I used to think McCain was one of the few republicans I could vote for because he was more his own man and didn't pander to the right. I guess he realized that he has to stick his nose up the conservative right's ass to get the nomination and now he's willing to do that. Too bad, he's lost my vote.

McCain says Roe v. Wade should be overturned
Presidential hopeful reaching out to GOP conservatives

SPARTANBURG, S.C. - Republican presidential candidate John McCain, looking to improve his standing with the party’s conservative voters, said Sunday the court decision that legalized abortion should be overturned.
“I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned,” the Arizona senator told about 800 people in South Carolina, one of the early voting states.
McCain also vowed that if elected, he would appoint judges who “strictly interpret the Constitution of the United States and do not legislate from the bench.”
The landmark 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade gave women the right to choose an abortion to terminate a pregnancy. The Supreme Court has narrowly upheld the decision, with the presence of an increasing number of more conservative justices on the court raising the possibility that abortion rights would be limited.
Social conservatives are a critical voting bloc in the GOP presidential primaries.
McCain’s campaign also announced early Sunday that he had been endorsed by former Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating, who had been considering his own bid for the White House, and former Texas Sen. Phil Gramm, who failed in his bid for the Republican nomination in 1996.
Keating told the crowd that McCain is the “only candidate who is a true-blue, Ronald Reagan conservative.”
McCain later attended an evening rally promoting an abstinence program. He told the crowd of more than 1,000 teens and parents that young people have pressures far different from the ones he faced while growing up. “Sometimes I’ve made the wrong choice,” McCain said.
He also talked about his experience as a prisoner of war during Vietnam, and described some of the torture he suffered. His captors “wanted to make us do things that we otherwise wouldn’t do,” including confessing to war crimes, McCain said.
He and fellow prisoners were beat up for practicing their religion, but they continued to do it. “Sometimes it is very difficult to do the right thing,” he said.
McCain has strong name recognition and the largest network of supporters in South Carolina. That backing comes in part from his staunch support for the Iraq war, something on which he focused a day earlier in Iowa. But it’s the same state that dealt a crushing blow to his presidential aspirations in 2000.
McCain is trying to build support among conservatives after a recent rebuke from Christian leader James Dobson, who said he wouldn’t back McCain’s presidential bid. Conservatives question McCain’s opposition to a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. He opposes same-sex marriage, but says it should be regulated by the states.
"Where there is sacrifice there is someone collecting the sacrificial offerings."-- Ayn Rand

"Some of my friends sit around every evening and they worry about the times ahead,
But everybody else is overwhelmed by indifference and the promise of an early bed..."-- Elvis Costello
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • Yes, he is an idiot that just lost any chance he had at being elected
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    he doesnt speak...why would anyone vote for a mute!
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    YourBuddy wrote:
    Yes, he is an idiot that just lost any chance he had at being elected

    yes b/c there has never been a candidate elected who has felt that way :rolleyes:
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    chopitdown wrote:
    yes b/c there has never been a candidate elected who has felt that way :rolleyes:


    I don't think the problem is that he believes this. It's the fact that McCain was always seen as a pretty moderate Republican and now in a desperate act to please the Christian right he is bowing to their pressure.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • mammasan wrote:
    I don't think the problem is that he believes this. It's the fact that McCain was always seen as a pretty moderate Republican and now in a desperate act to please the Christian right he is bowing to their pressure.

    Not only that, but mccain had support from some dems., but now that is gone he is unelectable. I used to like the man, now he has turned into an dribbling idiot
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    mammasan wrote:
    I don't think the problem is that he believes this. It's the fact that McCain was always seen as a pretty moderate Republican and now in a desperate act to please the Christian right he is bowing to their pressure.

    it'll be interesting to see how each candidate chosses to pander to some interest group.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    chopitdown wrote:
    it'll be interesting to see how each candidate chosses to pander to some interest group.
    From a legal point of view Roe vs Wade probably should be overturned. I don't understand why it's seen as pandering when it's just asserting state rights.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    chopitdown wrote:
    it'll be interesting to see how each candidate chosses to pander to some interest group.

    They all do it. I'm not trying to say that McCain is the only one. Prior to the 2000 Presidential race McCain came across, to me at least, as a man who stood for his beliefs and wasn't the type to conform to the party line if it was contrary to his personal belief. After the 2000 election that image I had of him went down the drain and after this recent event all ideas of him being his own man are gone. It's sad that in order to become president in this country you have to shelf your beliefs in order to gain votes.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • gabersgabers Posts: 2,787
    surferdude wrote:
    From a legal point of view Roe vs Wade probably should be overturned. I don't understand why it's seen as pandering when it's just asserting state rights.

    Who cares if he is for "states rights" if it means rights that are taken away from a woman's choice of having abortion as an option for an unwanted pregnancy (within the legal time limits)?
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    gabers wrote:
    Who cares if he is for "states rights" if it means rights that are taken away from a woman's choice of having abortion as an option for an unwanted pregnancy (within the legal time limits)?

    1) those rights never existed in the constitution
    2) the myth of the pro-choice movement is that overturning roe v. wade would suddenly make abortion illegal. it wouldn't.

    im pro-choice. but i favor overturning roe v. wade. fancy that? it was a dumb ruling that backfired on a liberal court by giving fuel to a crazy right wing religious movement that has been able to rally around abortion ever since. take that away and their fire will cool. in addition, women's advocates have become too complacent, banking on roe v wade to back them so they don't have to work as hard. most americans support abortion rights. let them come to the polls on a state by state basis. and let people mold their states to represent their views. the USA is not homogeneous, each region has its own flavor and the country works best when that is the case.

    as to mccain, he's just doing smart politics. that's how bush beat him in the 2000 primary... by moving further to the right. so mccain is going to try the same thing to secure the nomination. then he'll move back to the center for the election.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    surferdude wrote:
    From a legal point of view Roe vs Wade probably should be overturned. I don't understand why it's seen as pandering when it's just asserting state rights.


    Personally I think that would be the best thing to happen. I believe that it should be determined by each state wether abortion is legal. Secondly it would finally remove this issue from our national politics which in my opinion plays to great a role in determining our national leaders.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    mammasan wrote:
    Personally I think that would be the best thing to happen. I believe that it should be determined by each state wether abortion is legal. Secondly it would finally remove this issue from our national politics which in my opinion plays to great a role in determining our national leaders.

    yeah, that's what i was trying to say... you stated it much more plainly. let's make this a non-issue and let advocates lobby on a more local level instead of having our national politics dominated by religious debate.
  • I like McCain fries
    Master of Zen
  • gabersgabers Posts: 2,787
    I agree that politicians on both sides use it as a wedge issue, and I wish they wouldn't. Again though, IMO, it is something that should be a woman's choice, regardless of what the majority of the state's population or politicians think. In principle the whole "states rights" thing sounds like a great idea, but in this case I disagree that it's a good idea.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    gabers wrote:
    I agree that politicians on both sides use it as a wedge issue, and I wish they wouldn't. Again though, IMO, it is something that should be a woman's choice, regardless of what the majority of the state's population or politicians think. In principle the whole "states rights" thing sounds like a great idea, but in this case I disagree that it's a good idea.

    The problem I see with letting the issue of abortion supercede states rights is that you set a precident. What is to stop other issues from doing the same. As much as I believe that it is a woman's right I don't think that Roe v. Wade was a good decision based on the fact that it supercedes the rights of a state.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    surferdude wrote:
    From a legal point of view Roe vs Wade probably should be overturned. I don't understand why it's seen as pandering when it's just asserting state rights.

    I agree it's a terrible legal decision and should be overturned. But most people will just hear I think it should be overturned...meaning that he's pandering to the christian right...they don't care about states rights...they care about Roe being overturned. B/c Roe being overturned equates him to being against abortion; in their mind. So he can still appear moderate (not saying abortion should be stopped) but he can also appease that demographic by saying it should be overturned.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • kenny olavkenny olav Posts: 3,319
    i have to agree that overturning roe v wade wouldn't make a huge difference. abortion is ipso facto illegal once you get into the really conservative areas of this country because abortion providers become nonexistant. for example, 97% of the counties in Nevada do not have an abortion provider. i'm sure there some areas in this country where a woman would have to travel several hundred miles to get an abortion, and that there are cases where the woman has no means to make such a trip (not enough time or money).

    if they did overturn roe v wade, there is one possible significant difference. i suppose some states could make having an abortion a felony, like murder. and women who travel out of state to have an abortion would be convicted of murder if they return home. we'll see how long that stays popular.

    i am completely in favor of community rights, and smaller governments. let communities deal with the results of their own policies, it should help them progress.


    as for McCain, he proved how much of a typical bullshit politician he is the moment he backed George W Bush in 2000. this is just another case of pandering to further his career.
  • LikeAnOceanLikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    I used to like McCain, but ever since his stance on the war he's totally lost my respect.
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    chopitdown wrote:
    it'll be interesting to see how each candidate chosses to pander to some interest group.

    Dennis Kucinich won't! :D

    mccain is a tool, i used to have respect for him but not after he rolled over after the bush campaign flat out lied about him in the 2000 primaries, had disabled vets say he voted against helping wounded vets and other stuff concerning vets...which was a lie and then bush wins and mccain gives him a hug...wtf? where's your spine?

    there's a funny scene in the doc why we fight where he's being asked about all the no-bid contracts and mccain flat out said if he were in charge he'd have opened up investigations into the contracts...then he realizes what he's saying and there's a camera and starts backpeddling, it's hillarious
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    Kenny Olav wrote:
    as for McCain, he proved how much of a typical bullshit politician he is the moment he backed George W Bush in 2000. this is just another case of pandering to further his career.

    exactly! mccain was actually beating bush in the primaries then his campaign started questioning his mental facilities, spreading lies about him...how the hell can he turn around and support him after that and give him a hug no less!?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    El_Kabong wrote:
    Dennis Kucinich won't! :D

    mccain is a tool, i used to have respect for him but not after he rolled over after the bush campaign flat out lied about him in the 2000 primaries, had disabled vets say he voted against helping wounded vets and other stuff concerning vets...which was a lie and then bush wins and mccain gives him a hug...wtf? where's your spine?

    there's a funny scene in the doc why we fight where he's being asked about all the no-bid contracts and mccain flat out said if he were in charge he'd have opened up investigations into the contracts...then he realizes what he's saying and there's a camera and starts backpeddling, it's hillarious

    yes, and that's prob one reason he will never win (which is too bad...i'd love a candidate with a spine).

    those examples are exactly what is wrong with our politics. No one can tell you why to vote for themselves, they can just tell you how dirty the other guy is and why you shouldn't vote for them.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • TrauTrau Posts: 188
    You can't shit on McCain for being pragmatic. He's a politician, and unfortunately they all do this kind of crap.

    It's one of the banes of party politics.
    In the shadow of the light from a black sun
    Frigid statue standing icy blue and numb
    Where are the frost giants Ive begged for protection?
    I'm freezing

    Are you afraid, afraid to die
    Don't be afraid, afraid to try
  • Hes only doing what a good politician does to get the support of his party....lying. He cant get the nomination w/o some support from the bible thumpers. And the democratic candidates are doing a good job at lying too by saying theyd end the war and theyd been against it all along. (Obama, Hillary)
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    Hes only doing what a good politician does to get the support of his party....lying. He cant get the nomination w/o some support from the bible thumpers. And the democratic candidates are doing a good job at lying too by saying theyd end the war and theyd been against it all along. (Obama, Hillary)

    Not to stray off topic but I was watching Real Time on Friday and it was refreshing to hear what John Edwards had to say. Not that i agree with him on certain things, increasing taxes to pay for healthcare, but it was refreshing to hear a politician be honest. he didn't use the tired excuse of being tricked into voting to give the president authority to invade Iraq. he simply stated that he was wrong and had made a mistake. As for his healthcare plan, he was honest about it and made an unpopular statement by saying that he would raise taxes.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • TrauTrau Posts: 188
    John Edwards is a joke. I remember watching him on a Hardball college special, and he was practically having sex with himself.
    In the shadow of the light from a black sun
    Frigid statue standing icy blue and numb
    Where are the frost giants Ive begged for protection?
    I'm freezing

    Are you afraid, afraid to die
    Don't be afraid, afraid to try
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Kenny Olav wrote:
    if they did overturn roe v wade, there is one possible significant difference. i suppose some states could make having an abortion a felony, like murder. and women who travel out of state to have an abortion would be convicted of murder if they return home. we'll see how long that stays popular.

    they could probly strike that down by full faith and credit or interstate commerce clauses. shit, no state would be able to enforce it anyway. they wouldn't have jurisdiction to arrest and prosecute someone for murder in another state unless it was a federal crime. this thought did occur to me, but it would never fly. they'd never be able to legally accomplish it. though it'd be a pain in the ass for their first guinea pig prosecution.
  • Senator McStraight talk is utterly shameless. From the Dallas Morning News...

    "As a measure of the campaign's competitiveness, Mr. McCain has hired as part of his political team advisers he denounced after they skewered him in the 2000 primary against Mr. Bush.

    He has hired members of the media team and the firm that produced what Mr. McCain called "dishonest and dishonorable" commercials for the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth group that attacked Democrat John Kerry.

    In addition, the $1 million that Mr. McCain transferred from his Senate account to his presidential exploratory committee includes $4,200 from Houston homebuilder Bob Perry. Mr. Perry was the top contributor to Swift Boat Veterans.

    Mr. McCain said he's "very proud" of the political team he has assembled and the support he has received.

    "These are some of the best in the Republican Party, and I'm very happy to have them," he said. "People don't like sore losers. I've moved forward."
    "Of course it hurts. You're getting fucked by an elephant."
  • enharmonicenharmonic Posts: 1,917
    Well, he just lost my vote.

    A woman's right to choose should never be in question.
  • enharmonic wrote:
    Well, he just lost my vote.

    A woman's right to choose should never be in question.

    I agree.
    7/16/06 7/18/06
Sign In or Register to comment.