Jimmy Carter, hypocrite

13»

Comments

  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    cincybearcat wrote:
    Let's just start measuring their johnsons

    :D:D

    You made me laugh out loud.

    The thought of Chomsky and Friedman in a cock size contest!

    They shoould have done something similar with Bush and Sadaam! Put the two fuckers in a ring naked and made them fight to the death with their hands tied behind their backs using only their dicks as weapons. :eek:
    Fuck Lewis vs Hollyfield! This would have been the money spinner of the century! :D
  • the face
    the face Posts: 192
    Ahnimus wrote:
    I don't care what either of these two dorks think. I didn't read Carter's book and I feel dumber for having read this.[/QUOT

    Is that possible?
  • the face
    the face Posts: 192
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Check out this debate if you want to learn something about where this fella's coming from....

    http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/23/1450216

    http://www.chomsky.info/onchomsky/20051207.htm

    Id never even heard of that site. Thanks for posting the debate. It sounds alot like some of the debates we have over here, only with.....information. It was an interesting read. Both guys clearly had an ax to grind so I do not find either of their positions to be supported completely. There was truth in what both of them said. It was interesting to actually read the debate. Usually one listens to one. A couple of observations. Chomsky needs to stick to writing and stop speaking. Especially when the person you are debating happens to be one of the best lawyers on earth. From a debating standpoint Chomsky got skewered. His words sound like a textbook. Dershowitz is an ora wordsmith. He is a fucking assasin.

    With respect to Chomsky I am just stunned that one of the worlds pre-eminent polical scientists was just flat wrong on some of the history. I read this guy in college and respected his writing, but what the hell happened here?

    I think there is a reason that Chomsky has become a darling of the extreme political left. No one else will accpet him. He cites the fucking UN the EU and the World Court. All of these institutions are clearly skewered against the US. Why not cite someone that is not obviously biased against our policy if he is trying to persuade.

    I really read this thing with an open mind and thank you for posting it. Good informative read. It also illustrates just how unsolveable that issue really is.
  • the face
    the face Posts: 192
    Fascinating guy. I now understand why he is so popular over here. The guy is a fucking self described anarachist socialist. And he's a mathmetician, not a political scientist. Who knew? Apparenty Hugo Chavez has taken a liking to him as well.....Learn something new every day.
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    the face wrote:
    Id never even heard of that site. Thanks for posting the debate....Chomsky needs to stick to writing and stop speaking. .

    No problem.
    Although as far as Chomsky needing to stick to writing and stop speaking, I'll have to disagree with you on this point. I've seen quite a lot of footage of him speaking and he is a superb speaker. The knowledge he has memorized pertaining to world affairs, with dates, names, places e.t.c, is quite astounding. I actually think he's most impressive when engaged in a one-on-one debate with someone. He has a tendency to verbally destroy his opponent by the sheer weight and clairty of his argument. Many of his opponents in these debates end up storming out emabarrased and humiliated. If you can get your hands on a copy of the documentary 'Manufacturing consent' then do so. It's brilliant, and a real eye-opener.
    You can find a lot more of his writings, interviews, video and audio files on here: http://www.chomsky.info/index.htm

Categories