Home› A Moving Train

Anyone else see a problem with George Stephanopoulus hosting the democratic debate?

my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
edited May 2008 in A Moving Train
kind of old news...but did anyone else see the CLEAR conflict of interest in having long time Clinton cronie Stephanopoulos hosting that debate a few weeks ago?


"he was a senior political adviser to the 1992 U.S. presidential campaign of Bill Clinton and later became Clinton's communications director."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Stephanopoulos


anyone else see a direct connection between him hosting and the ridiculous questions and tones of the debate?
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    Richardson turned traitor, maybe he will too.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    unsung wrote:
    Richardson turned traitor, maybe he will too.


    not after that blatantly skewed debate... all they did was hamemr the bullshit non issues such as wright for 45 minutes...
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    yeah, almost as much as obama having such strong nafta and wto supporters and lawyer as an advisor on trade and economic issues....
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • GauchoBGauchoB Posts: 224
    my2hands wrote:
    kind of old news...but did anyone else see the CLEAR conflict of interest in having long time Clinton cronie Stephanopoulos hosting that debate a few weeks ago?


    "he was a senior political adviser to the 1992 U.S. presidential campaign of Bill Clinton and later became Clinton's communications director."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Stephanopoulos


    anyone else see a direct connection between him hosting and the ridiculous questions and tones of the debate?

    If you need to wiki this guy to know who he is your on the wrong board. And no, no conflict. As we have all seen no one has any loyalties to the Clintons.
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    GauchoB wrote:
    IAs we have all seen no one has any loyalties to the Clintons.

    I don't know how you and unkept can keep making comments like that. You take it so personal when former Clinton supporters go to Obama. These people are Democrats first, and Obama is the future of the Democratic party.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • GauchoBGauchoB Posts: 224
    ledvedderman wrote:
    I don't know how you and unkept can keep making comments like that. You take it so personal when former Clinton supporters go to Obama. These people are Democrats first, and Obama is the future of the Democratic party.


    I dont take it personal, but they sure are
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    GauchoB wrote:
    I dont take it personal, but they sure are

    They sure are what?
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
Sign In or Register to comment.