Longshore Union strikes against the war

my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
edited May 2008 in A Moving Train
Longshore Union Strikes Against War
By Peter Cole
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Tuesday 29 April 2008

On Thursday, May Day, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union will declare an eight-hour strike to protest the war in Iraq. Since the ILWU controls every port along the U.S. Pacific Coast, including Seattle and Tacoma, this strike demonstrates the collective power of workers willing to use it.

The ILWU is demanding "an immediate end to the war and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan and the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the Middle East." Although the majority of Americans repeatedly have expressed their desire to end the war, President Bush has not obliged us, so it drags on. Because our leaders refuse to listen, ILWU members are taking the next logical step for workers: Strike.

For those unfamiliar, the ILWU is perhaps the most militant and politicized worker organization in the nation. It operates in one of the most important sectors of the world economy - marine transport - and, thus, is in a strategic location to put peace above profits.

Forged in the fires of 1930s worker struggles to gain basic rights, the ILWU was born in 1934 when longshoremen (there were no women in the industry then, though there are now) performed the incredibly hard, dangerous and important work of loading and unloading ships. To improve their wages and wrest some control over their lives, men all along the coast struck - and in a few instances died - to gain union recognition.

The ILWU is highly democratic. A caucus of more than 100 longshore workers representing every union local establishes policies for the Longshore Division. It was this caucus that voted to declare the May Day strike.

Dockworkers, including those in the ILWU, have a proud tradition of political action. For example, in the 1980s the ILWU respected the strike of British dockworkers by refusing to unload a ship worked by scab labor. Just last week, union longshoremen in South Africa refused to unload a Chinese vessel carrying military supplies destined for autocratic Zimbabwe - a tremendous example of solidarity.

That the ILWU chose International Workers' Day to declare this strike suggests its political commitment and internationalism. Around the world, workers honor labor by taking a holiday. What few Americans know is that the tradition of a May Day strike originated not in the Soviet Union in the 1950s but the United States of the 1880s.

These days, such examples of worker power are increasingly rare in the U.S. The tragedy is that, historically, labor activism gave us the 40-hour workweek (and the weekend) and helped humanize the exploitative excesses of unregulated capitalism. As income inequality continues to grow in the United States, it is wise to remember how, in the past, strong unions created a larger middle class as well as a more democratic and egalitarian nation.

The ILWU strike also reminds us that unions still have an important role in public discussions beyond the workplace. As a democratic institution, the ILWU is precisely the sort of "civic society" that the Bush administration has been trying to create in Iraq. On May 1, dockworkers will speak loud and clear - end the endless war in Iraq. Other American workers who want to support our troops by bringing them home can make their voices heard by joining with the brave men and women of the ILWU and taking the day off.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/361087_mayday.html
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    That is admirable. and effective. Paid for in lives, the longshoremen make an impact. I think its great they are opposing the war, especially given their impact.

    Hell yeah.
  • hailhailkchailhailkc Posts: 582
    Since they're union, I'm sure they'll be paid for those eight hours anyway. I wish I worked somewhere where I could just organize a day off for something I oppose.
    MOSSAD NATO Alphabet Stations (E10)
    High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
    Low Traffic CIO MIW
    Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    hailhailkc wrote:
    Since they're union, I'm sure they'll be paid for those eight hours anyway. I wish I worked somewhere where I could just organize a day off for something I oppose.
    Labor runs this country. They should have a voice that reflects that. And they do.
  • SpreadtheJAMSpreadtheJAM Posts: 344
    Wow! We better get an end to this war fast to avert this eight hour strike.
    BORGATA>VIC
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    Wow! We better get an end to this war fast to avert this eight hour strike.
    If that spreads to to a general strike there is no country to run. Labor has the power.
  • SpreadtheJAMSpreadtheJAM Posts: 344
    Commy wrote:
    If that spreads to to a general strike there is no country to run. Labor has the power.

    That would never happen. Unions dont have as much power as you think. There would be plenty of people crossing the lines to fill these jobs.
    Too bad Ronald Reagan isn't in office anymore.
    BORGATA>VIC
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    That would never happen. Unions dont have as much power as you think. There would be plenty of people crossing the lines to fill these jobs.
    Too bad Ronald Reagan isn't in office anymore.
    Reagan was a tool. And labor runs this country. If they wanted to they could end this terrible idea of a war on terrorism.

    If we don't work there is no country to RUN.
  • SpreadtheJAMSpreadtheJAM Posts: 344
    Commy wrote:
    Reagan was a tool. And labor runs this country. If they wanted to they could end this terrible idea of a war on terrorism.

    If we don't work there is no country to RUN.

    I can understand your pont of view based soley on your name and location. I think you would be better of living in 1970's Russia, if you have such a problem with capitalism.
    BORGATA>VIC
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    I can understand your pont of view based soley on your name and location. I think you would be better of living in 1970's Russia, if you have such a problem with capitalism.
    right,.
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    hailhailkc wrote:
    Since they're union, I'm sure they'll be paid for those eight hours anyway. I wish I worked somewhere where I could just organize a day off for something I oppose.


    Probably one of the dumbest comments I've seen. I'm union, and I only get paid when I show up for work.
  • fragileblakefragileblake Posts: 716
    Right, and since thats how your union works that must be how every union works?
    unsung wrote:
    Probably one the the dumbest comments I've seen. I'm union, and I only get paid when I show up for work.
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    So his comment that they automatically get paid is accurate?
  • fragileblakefragileblake Posts: 716
    No, but I don't think it qualifies on a "dumbest" comment list. I have a lot of labor contacts and some unions pay for these kinds of activities and some don't.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    The occupation managed to survive the longshoreman strike....
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    know1 wrote:
    The occupation managed to survive the longshoreman strike....


    sure thing, belittle their efforts while you sit at home :rolleyes:
  • my2hands wrote:
    Longshore Union Strikes Against War
    By Peter Cole
    The Seattle Post-Intelligencer

    Tuesday 29 April 2008

    On Thursday, May Day, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union will declare an eight-hour strike to protest the war in Iraq. Since the ILWU controls every port along the U.S. Pacific Coast, including Seattle and Tacoma, this strike demonstrates the collective power of workers willing to use it.

    The ILWU is demanding "an immediate end to the war and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan and the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the Middle East." Although the majority of Americans repeatedly have expressed their desire to end the war, President Bush has not obliged us, so it drags on. Because our leaders refuse to listen, ILWU members are taking the next logical step for workers: Strike.

    For those unfamiliar, the ILWU is perhaps the most militant and politicized worker organization in the nation. It operates in one of the most important sectors of the world economy - marine transport - and, thus, is in a strategic location to put peace above profits.

    Forged in the fires of 1930s worker struggles to gain basic rights, the ILWU was born in 1934 when longshoremen (there were no women in the industry then, though there are now) performed the incredibly hard, dangerous and important work of loading and unloading ships. To improve their wages and wrest some control over their lives, men all along the coast struck - and in a few instances died - to gain union recognition.

    The ILWU is highly democratic. A caucus of more than 100 longshore workers representing every union local establishes policies for the Longshore Division. It was this caucus that voted to declare the May Day strike.

    Dockworkers, including those in the ILWU, have a proud tradition of political action. For example, in the 1980s the ILWU respected the strike of British dockworkers by refusing to unload a ship worked by scab labor. Just last week, union longshoremen in South Africa refused to unload a Chinese vessel carrying military supplies destined for autocratic Zimbabwe - a tremendous example of solidarity.

    That the ILWU chose International Workers' Day to declare this strike suggests its political commitment and internationalism. Around the world, workers honor labor by taking a holiday. What few Americans know is that the tradition of a May Day strike originated not in the Soviet Union in the 1950s but the United States of the 1880s.

    These days, such examples of worker power are increasingly rare in the U.S. The tragedy is that, historically, labor activism gave us the 40-hour workweek (and the weekend) and helped humanize the exploitative excesses of unregulated capitalism. As income inequality continues to grow in the United States, it is wise to remember how, in the past, strong unions created a larger middle class as well as a more democratic and egalitarian nation.

    The ILWU strike also reminds us that unions still have an important role in public discussions beyond the workplace. As a democratic institution, the ILWU is precisely the sort of "civic society" that the Bush administration has been trying to create in Iraq. On May 1, dockworkers will speak loud and clear - end the endless war in Iraq. Other American workers who want to support our troops by bringing them home can make their voices heard by joining with the brave men and women of the ILWU and taking the day off.

    http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/361087_mayday.html

    good for them. beats the hell out of standing around a street with a sign.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    my2hands wrote:
    sure thing, belittle their efforts while you sit at home :rolleyes:

    I'm at work ;)

    They (or you) can belittle me for that if they want to.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    Union's War Protest Shuts Down West Coast Ports
    By William Yardley
    The New York Times

    Friday 02 May 2008

    Seattle - West Coast ports were shut down on Thursday as thousands of longshoremen failed to report for work, part of what their union leaders said was a one-day, one-shift protest against the war in Iraq.

    Cranes and forklifts stood still from Seattle to San Diego, and ships were stalled at sea as workers held rallies up and down the coast to blame the war for distracting public attention and money from domestic needs like health care and education.

    "We're loyal to America, and we won't stand by while our country, our troops and our economy are being destroyed by a war that's bankrupting us to the tune of $3 trillion," the president of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Bob McEllrath, said in a written statement. "It's time to stand up, and we're doing our part today."

    About 25,000 union members are employed at 29 West Coast ports, but the protest took place only during the day shift. A spokesman for the main West Coast employers' group, the Pacific Maritime Association, said it appeared that about 6,000 workers did not show up for work, which meant that about 10,000 containers would not be loaded or unloaded from about 30 cargo ships.

    The spokesman, Steve Getzug, cast the action as a strike and therefore a violation of the union's labor contract, which is up for renewal this summer.

    "What the union says and what the union does are two different things," Mr. Getzug said. "This is genuine defiance."

    Union leaders said that the association had rejected their request weeks ago for Thursday's one-shift work stoppage, but that local longshoremen continued to promote the protest. It went forward, the union leaders said, despite a demand on Wednesday by an independent arbitrator that they instruct members to go to work.

    In many cases, dock workers were joined at port entrances or at rallies by other groups protesting the war or frustrated by economic issues or immigration policies. Some rallies seemed as much like street fairs as angry acts of resistance, with booksellers setting up stands and supporters of the presidential candidate Ralph Nader carrying banners.

    On the Seattle waterfront, members of the United Auto Workers and the Service Employees International Union mixed with self-described socialists while many of the scores of police officers on the scene ate box lunches and petted their horses.

    In Oakland, Calif., some truckers who said they were angry about high gas prices decided not to cross picket lines at the port.

    "I got here ready to haul," said Cesar Lara, 41, a resident of Richmond, Calif., born in Zacatecas, Mexico. "They told me it was a picket but if I wanted to go in I could. But I'm supporting them and to end the war."

    Several drivers said truckers were planning their own nationwide work stoppage in the next several days to protest record-high gas prices and surcharges.

    In Long Beach, Calif., part of nation's largest port complex, truck drivers from California and neighboring states waited for the port security gates to reopen on Thursday evening, when union members said they planned to return to work. Nearby, in Wilmington, longshoremen met inside a hall while some union members outside read pink fliers stating the reasons for work stoppage.

    Kevin Schroeder, director of Local 13's political action committee, said, "The children of middle-class people are over there dying, so we decided to do something. We are fortunate enough to be in an organization that has a platform to do something."


    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/02/us/02port.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1209736839-noCm34HPMfQSS2UGq1HDGQ
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    I give them credit for actually standing up for what they believe in, but I highly doubt it will change anything. Even if they organized a nation-wide extended strike it would do anything. Yes there would definitely be disruptions but within a couple of days their would be scabs taking their jobs and everything would return to normal. Unions no longer have the power they once did.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • elmerelmer Posts: 1,683
    I have a lot of labor contacts and some unions pay for these kinds of activities and some don't.
    hehehe. Go strum a G chord you bitch!
  • farfromglorifiedfarfromglorified Posts: 5,696
    A nice gesture. Won't accomplish anything in terms of the war, but good for them for voicing their displeasure in this manner. Were I their boss, I'd fire them all, but I'm not their boss.
  • redsdiseaseredsdisease Posts: 147
    So excited for them. People who argue that it's not effective are missing the point. Clearly a single day of protest is not going to end the war; however, these kinds of large scale actions are precisely what is needed to build up the anti-war movement into something that can be effective. The majority of the country is against the war, people need to get up off of their asses and work to end it.
    Jimmy Carter has disco fever.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    So excited for them. People who argue that it's not effective are missing the point. Clearly a single day of protest is not going to end the war; however, these kinds of large scale actions are precisely what is needed to build up the anti-war movement into something that can be effective. The majority of the country is against the war, people need to get up off of their asses and work to end it.

    The reason why there is not a large anti-war movement is because the majority of the population is unaffected by the war. If the draft was to be reinstated, which it will not, you would see a movement the likes of that during Vietnam sprout up over night.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Wow! We better get an end to this war fast to avert this eight hour strike.
    ...
    Support for the War in Viet Nam shifted when hardhats swung to the anti-war side. They had come to realize that the war wasn't worth the effort when the War Veterans came home telling the truth to what was going on over there and that it wasn't doing anything to stop Communism.
    Remember... Blue collar Union Joes are typically the 'Love It Or Leave It' types.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • citizen_drewcitizen_drew Posts: 170
    But I wonder how much this has to do with the ILWU renegotiating their contract this summer and their ability to sight a recent case of their willingness to strike.

    In ’02 they got locked out for supposedly slowing down production to support contract demands resulting in a floating city of enormous cargo ships strewn from Long Beach all the way out to Catalina with nowhere to dock. I think that went on for at least a couple weeks to the tune of $147 million per day.
  • redsdiseaseredsdisease Posts: 147
    mammasan wrote:
    The reason why there is not a large anti-war movement is because the majority of the population is unaffected by the war. If the draft was to be reinstated, which it will not, you would see a movement the likes of that during Vietnam sprout up over night.
    Sure, but that doesn't mean that people should just let it happen.
    Jimmy Carter has disco fever.
Sign In or Register to comment.