US panel backs India nuclear deal

drivingrldrivingrl Posts: 1,448
edited June 2006 in A Moving Train

A US Congressional panel has backed a controversial plan to share civilian nuclear technology with India.
The deal offers US nuclear technology to India in exchange for inspectors' access to Indian civilian reactors.

The House of Representatives' International Relations Committee voted 37-5 for the deal, which must still be put to another panel and to Congress.

The agreement was hailed as historic by supporters, although critics say it will damage non-proliferation efforts.

Strategic re-alignment

President George W Bush finalised the agreement during a landmark trip to India in March.

Under the deal, energy-hungry India will get access to US civil nuclear technology and fuel, in return for opening its civilian nuclear facilities to inspection.

But its nuclear weapons sites will remain off-limits.

India has 14 reactors in commercial operation and nine under construction
Nuclear power supplies about 3% of India's electricity
By 2050, nuclear power is expected to provide 25% of the country's electricity
India has limited coal and uranium reserves
Its huge thorium reserves - about 25% of the world's total - are expected to fuel its nuclear power programme long-term
Source: Uranium Information Center

Global nuclear powers

The agreement reverses US policy, which has restricted nuclear co-operation since India, which has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), tested a nuclear weapon in 1974.

"This is a historic hearing," said Democrat representative Tom Lantos, a sponsor of the proposed legislation.

He said the importance of the bill could not be overstated and the deal signalled a "sweeping strategic re-alignment" of India's global policies.

Indian analysts lauded the US panel backing the nuclear deal.

"The world has recognised India as a responsible nuclear weapon power. This debate is proof of this," C Rajamohan told the NDTV news channel.

The Indian Express newspaper said the "strong bipartisan support [in the House of Representatives' International Relations Committee] suggests that the political momentum behind this historic but controversial nuclear deal .. may now be unstoppable".


But critics of the deal say it could boost India's nuclear arsenal and sends the wrong message to countries like Iran, whose nuclear ambitions Washington opposes.

"The NPT has been knifed by an executive action," said Republican representative Jim Leach.

"Anyone who wants to present this as a happy day is making a very serious mistake."

If the proposed deal is passed by the powerful US Senate Foreign Relations Committee later this week, it will then be voted on by the full House and Senate.

The BBC's Shahzeb Jillani in Washington says opinion is divided in Washington on whether the Bush administration has the bipartisan support it claims it has on the deal.

Last week, US Vice President Dick Cheney said he hoped Congress would move quickly to enact the legislation.

He said the deal was "one of the most important strategic foreign policy initiatives of President Bush's second term".

Critics believe that at a time when the stand-off with North Korea and Iran is deepening, a civilian co-operation deal with a country which has not signed the NPT severely undermines the global nuclear non-proliferation regime.
drivingrl: "Will I ever get to meet Gwen Stefani?"
kevinbeetle: "Yes. When her career washes up and her and Gavin move to Galveston, you will meet her at Hot Topic shopping for a Japanese cheerleader outfit.

Post edited by Unknown User on


  • Options
    El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    drivingrl wrote:
    But its nuclear weapons sites will remain off-limits.

    wow, what a brilliant idea!!!
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
Sign In or Register to comment.