the OSCARS ban the goodie bag!!!

dunkman
Posts: 19,646
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2511237,00.html
For Hollywood film stars they have become a “must-have” perk of being part of glamorous award ceremonies: the lavish goodie bags handed out to presenters, nominees and even members of the celebrity audience at the Oscars and the Golden Globes.
At the 2006 Academy Awards, the “swag bag” was thought to be worth about $100,000 (£50,000), including such perks as a home-cooked meal for ten by the celebrity chef Wolfgang Puck, a free Cadillac for two weeks, $7,000 of Victoria’s Secret underwear, and a coupon for Lasik eyecorrecting surgery in LA.
But film stars will leave the 2007 Oscars empty-handed after the intervention of the US taxman, who has declared that the gifts are liable to income tax.
Ed Norton, the Oscarnominated actor and director, has described them as “sick and disgusting”, claiming that they made Hollywood “look ridiculous and out of touch”.
He told New York magazine: “The gift baskets, worth amounts of money that a low-income family could live on for a year, [are given to] people who have so much already. It gets depressing. You sit there, going, ‘This is an embarrassment’.”
why give millionaires gifts they can easily afford themselves?
i think this a brilliant decision by the tax dept which has resulted in this kind of celeb backslapping shit!!
For Hollywood film stars they have become a “must-have” perk of being part of glamorous award ceremonies: the lavish goodie bags handed out to presenters, nominees and even members of the celebrity audience at the Oscars and the Golden Globes.
At the 2006 Academy Awards, the “swag bag” was thought to be worth about $100,000 (£50,000), including such perks as a home-cooked meal for ten by the celebrity chef Wolfgang Puck, a free Cadillac for two weeks, $7,000 of Victoria’s Secret underwear, and a coupon for Lasik eyecorrecting surgery in LA.
But film stars will leave the 2007 Oscars empty-handed after the intervention of the US taxman, who has declared that the gifts are liable to income tax.
Ed Norton, the Oscarnominated actor and director, has described them as “sick and disgusting”, claiming that they made Hollywood “look ridiculous and out of touch”.
He told New York magazine: “The gift baskets, worth amounts of money that a low-income family could live on for a year, [are given to] people who have so much already. It gets depressing. You sit there, going, ‘This is an embarrassment’.”
why give millionaires gifts they can easily afford themselves?

i think this a brilliant decision by the tax dept which has resulted in this kind of celeb backslapping shit!!
oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
that is good news. I like the Ed Norton quote too; I wonder how many in hollywood feel that way though.make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need0
-
dunkman1974 wrote:why give millionaires gifts they can easily afford themselves?
I ask myself this everytime I'm looking for a Christmas present for my dad.'We're learning songs for baby Jesus' birthday. His mum and dad were Merry and Joseph. He had a bed made of clay and the three kings bought him Gold, Frankenstein and Merv as presents.'
- the great Sir Leo Harrison0 -
I think I love Ed Norton now...any celebrity who can see through the fluff is admirable. Now, think about the actresses who love these free gifts...Gweneth Paltrow has been known to say, "Why should I buy something when I can get it for free?" And Winona Ryder...well, she just didn't want to spend her millions, she'd rather steal it.0
-
dunkman1974 wrote:
i think this a brilliant decision!
ok, but it's not like the decision was made for altruistic reasons.
"oh noes!!!! we'll have to pay tax!!!"0 -
chopitdown wrote:I wonder how many in hollywood feel that way though.
Probably not too many. In yesterdays am morning new york free paper it spoke of Nick Hambone Lachey picking out loads of free loot from some event and his intentions of giving these items as gifts to his fiance and mom for Xmas. What a fuckin' loser!"The leads are weak!"
"The leads are weak? Fuckin' leads are weak? You're Weak! I've Been in this business 15 years"
"What's your name?"
"FUCK YOU! THAT"S MY NAME!"0 -
exhausted wrote:ok, but it's not like the decision was made for altruistic reasons.
"oh noes!!!! we'll have to pay tax!!!"
sorry... i meant it was a brilliant decision by the taxman.. not the Oscar folks.. they are just not giving now as it'll upset the fluffy celebs... which makes them still sycophants.
but bravo to the Tax Officeoh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.0 -
harmless_little_f*** wrote:I ask myself this everytime I'm looking for a Christmas present for my dad.
i know what you can get your dad this year...a sponsorship card...to sponsor me in my unemployment while i look for a job! ha.I'll dig a tunnel
from my window to yours0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help