31 Die in Suicide Bombing (No Not in Iraq hippies)

bootlegger10

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/07/15/pakistan.violence/index.html

American Liberal: "Radical Islamic terrorists attack us because we have bases in the middle east and interfere too much."

Me: "Why did they just kill 31 innocent people in Pakistan? Because the USA has bases in Iraq?"

Radical Islamic terrorists do not care about US bases. They care about spreading their Islamic law. Those who do not comply, they must be killed. That is our enemy. The US being in the middle east is stopping radical Islam from taking over, for now. Liberals want to pull back and try and talk to these people. Good luck. These people hide behind children when fighting. They have no souls to talk to. They are animals.

Point is, 31 people died in a suicide bomb in Pakistan. America did not create terrorism.

Rushlimbo

Fairly obvious this was not in Iraq since 31 dead would be small stuff -- more like a U.S. cluster bomb exploding in a schoolyard for 31 dead. As for your dribble, we arm Pakistan, we prop up their dictator, we give them billions a year even though they despise us. Kind of makes us as ignorant as their suicide bombs.

Bu2

We're also not at war with it -- because we're being diverted by an occupation in Iraq.

bootlegger10

Rushlimbo wrote:

Fairly obvious this was not in Iraq since 31 dead would be small stuff -- more like a U.S. cluster bomb exploding in a schoolyard for 31 dead. As for your dribble, we arm Pakistan, we prop up their dictator, we give them billions a year even though they despise us. Kind of makes us as ignorant as their suicide bombs.

Yep, it is our fault. These people would be flowering their gardens all day if we didn't get in their way. Wake up and find out who the enemy is instead of blaming America every chance you get.

If we could fight this war outside of the towns, we would do it. These animals needs innocents to be killed because they know they cannot beat us militarily, but they can beat us by using our media and counting on the weakness of the American people.

bootlegger10

Bu2 wrote:

We're also not at war with it -- because we're being diverted by an occupation in Iraq.

Correct. These people in power are idiots. Every last one of them. Although now Al Qaeda is in Iraq, so we gotta kill em there.

RockinInCanada

bootlegger10 wrote:

Yep, it is our fault. These people would be flowering their gardens all day if we didn't get in their way. Wake up and find out who the enemy is instead of blaming America every chance you get.

If we could fight this war outside of the towns, we would do it. These animals needs innocents to be killed because they know they cannot beat us militarily, but they can beat us by using our media and counting on the weakness of the American people.

Well if you invade a country then be prepared for how things are going to be fought don't come on here and whine..."bastards won't fight us in the open"...blah blah blah....get over it this is the reality that your country choose now deal with the reprecussions (that were told prior to invasion to what woudl occur but the warbirds had to go right in...act first think second mentality)....do you expect your enemy to fight according to some rules especially coming from a person whose nation is notrious for breaking the rules when it comes to warfare.....give me a break....plus the American army has done enough killing innocents albeit accidently or intentionally....

As for using the media...I guess its a shame that your view of the war is now not the populcar choice and I guess (even though I still see otherwise) the media is somehow reflecting that....as an outsider who had to listen to pro-war shit for the last few years I like the change in view...now you get used to it....


Also clue-in buddy anti-war does equate to hippie.....


It means now your enemy is crossing borders...the entire Iraq policy has just hrown gasoline on an existing inferno.....which has now spilled into other countries unfortuantly..

Bu2

to kill them. Al Qaeda is also in Afghanistan, but we don't have enough troops there to kill them. Al Qaeda aren't the only terrorists out there, though. There are other groups, other people from different places than the middle east who do terrorist acts, but we don't go after them either.

We're supposed to be fighting a war on terror, which means finding and stopping terrorists who practice terrorism, and yet we're in Iraq, killing people who are fighting us because we invaded their country under false pretenses.

Makes no sense to me.

RockinInCanada

bootlegger10 wrote:

Correct. These people in power are idiots. Every last one of them. Although now Al Qaeda is in Iraq, so we gotta kill em there.

Well you brought them there...blame your superiors instead of spouting off about hippies and crap....

RockinInCanada

Bu2 wrote:

to kill them. Al Qaeda is also in Afghanistan, but we don't have enough troops there to kill them. Al Qaeda aren't the only terrorists out there, though. There are other groups, other people from different places than the middle east who do terrorist acts, but we don't go after them either.

We're supposed to be fighting a war on terror, which means finding and stopping terrorists who practice terrorism, and yet we're in Iraq, killing people who are fighting us because we invaded their country under false pretenses.

Makes no sense to me.

The entire concept of the war on terror is flawed.....just another brain dead policy that people believed was the saving grace for their problems...it hs only exagerrated the problem....

Bu2

Rockin'InCanada wrote:

The entire concept of the war on terror is flawed.....just another brain dead policy that people believed was the saving grace for their problems...it hs only exagerrated the problem....

Now tell that to my President.

RockinInCanada

Bu2 wrote:

Now tell that to my President.

I have a hunch it would mean nothing to a man who believes he is above the law....

Bu2

you are right.

bootlegger10

Rockin'InCanada wrote:

Well if you invade a country then be prepared for how things are going to be fought don't come on here and whine..."bastards won't fight us in the open"...blah blah blah....get over it this is the reality that your country choose now deal with the reprecussions (that were told prior to invasion to what woudl occur but the warbirds had to go right in...act first think second mentality)....do you expect your enemy to fight according to some rules especially coming from a person whose nation is notrious for breaking the rules when it comes to warfare.....give me a break....plus the American army has done enough killing innocents albeit accidently or intentionally....

Also clue-in buddy anti-war does equate to hippie.....

Come on, don't take my hippy comment seriously. It just makes me laugh when I type it, so I do. As for not knowing that we would have to fight in the middle of towns when we went to Iraq, that is absurd. It is war. People are going to die. Innocent people are going to die. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE THOUGH when you shoot a missile to kill insurgents and fighters and accidently kill civilians, than blowing yourself in a market just to kill innocent people. My point is that these people don't care who dies. They have no respect for anyone, so this talking shit you guys keep spouting about is not going to work. Hell, we supported Bin Laden once, and you saw where that got is with him, so you think they are going to care about what we can bring to the peace table? No. They want us gone!

RockinInCanada

bootlegger10 wrote:

Come on, don't take my hippy comment seriously. It just makes me laugh when I type it, so I do. As for not knowing that we would have to fight in the middle of towns when we went to Iraq, that is absurd. It is war. People are going to die. Innocent people are going to die. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE THOUGH when you shoot a missile to kill insurgents and fighters and accidently kill civilians, than blowing yourself in a market just to kill innocent people. My point is that these people don't care who dies. They have no respect for anyone, so this talking shit you guys keep spouting about is not going to work. Hell, we supported Bin Laden once, and you saw where that got is with him, so you think they are going to care about what we can bring to the peace table? No. They want us gone!

A simple question then....to keep things civil....why do they want you gone?

And please for the love of everything holy do not say our freedoms.....

bootlegger10

Rockin'InCanada wrote:

Well you brought them there...blame your superiors instead of spouting off about hippies and crap....

They at least would not give in to the terrorists. They at least understand that the fight against terrorism will be a long battle never fought before. Yet, they fight it like idiots.

Rushlimbo

bootlegger10 wrote:

Come on, don't take my hippy comment seriously. It just makes me laugh when I type it, so I do. As for not knowing that we would have to fight in the middle of towns when we went to Iraq, that is absurd. It is war. People are going to die. Innocent people are going to die. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE THOUGH when you shoot a missile to kill insurgents and fighters and accidently kill civilians, than blowing yourself in a market just to kill innocent people. My point is that these people don't care who dies. They have no respect for anyone, so this talking shit you guys keep spouting about is not going to work. Hell, we supported Bin Laden once, and you saw where that got is with him, so you think they are going to care about what we can bring to the peace table? No. They want us gone!

You say this like the U.S. cares about the innocent civilians that we kill on a daily basis. How is that respect? Giving their families $2500 is a show of respect?

RockinInCanada

bootlegger10 wrote:

They at least would not give in to the terrorists. They at least understand that the fight against terrorism will be a long battle never fought before. Yet, they fight it like idiots.

It will never be won this way....never.....I am 100% confident in that decision...your policy creates terror.....sadly it does and do not for one second believe that I enjoy saying that but I do not...the faux war on terror has lead to many deaths of those that wanted no part of this madness....do you really expect your nation to put up with long years of this stuff...your deaths you label as accidental creates more "terrorists" even as we speak and some cannot fathom the simplicity of why that happens...

gue_barium

bootlegger10 wrote:

Yep, it is our fault. These people would be flowering their gardens all day if we didn't get in their way. Wake up and find out who the enemy is instead of blaming America every chance you get.

If we could fight this war outside of the towns, we would do it. These animals needs innocents to be killed because they know they cannot beat us militarily, but they can beat us by using our media and counting on the weakness of the American people.

You're brainwashed.

bootlegger10

Rockin'InCanada wrote:

A simple question then....to keep things civil....why do they want you gone?

And please for the love of everything holy do not say our freedoms.....

They don't care about our freedoms! They care about their Islamic law. They care about mistreating women. They care about using young boys as play toys. They care about fighting until the end (they believe they are rewarded spiritually for killing, so their nature is to fight). You saw what the Taliban did in Afghanistan. That is what they care about. And the US and West stands in the way of their expansion. China and North Korea are even more oppressive, so why fight them?

Also, a lot of us (myself included) believed education could stop terrorism. Well, now we see even doctors can be terrorists.

bootlegger10

gue_barium wrote:

You're brainwashed.

Nope. Realistic. If I were brainwashed I wouldn't be able to say that Bush and Cheney are idiots.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

bootlegger10 wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/07/15/pakistan.violence/index.html

American Liberal: "Radical Islamic terrorists attack us because we have bases in the middle east and interfere too much."

Me: "Why did they just kill 31 innocent people in Pakistan? Because the USA has bases in Iraq?"

Radical Islamic terrorists do not care about US bases. They care about spreading their Islamic law. Those who do not comply, they must be killed. That is our enemy. The US being in the middle east is stopping radical Islam from taking over, for now. Liberals want to pull back and try and talk to these people. Good luck. These people hide behind children when fighting. They have no souls to talk to. They are animals.

Point is, 31 people died in a suicide bomb in Pakistan. America did not create terrorism.

What's this extreme right side propaganda nonsense. You're doing exactly what they want you to.

You're dancing for them, and they are rubbing their hands together and laughing at you.