Home› A Moving Train

bush backs hastert to keep job

DPrival78DPrival78 Posts: 2,263
edited October 2006 in A Moving Train
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20061004-121911-6361r.htm

nice to see georgie boy sticking up for this pedophile-enabler.

i guess he doesn't think covering up for people who send kids sexually explicit emails is a bad thing.

why am i not surprised?
i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Scratchin a LetterScratchin a Letter Posts: 2,303
    DPrival78 wrote:
    http://www.washtimes.com/national/20061004-121911-6361r.htm

    nice to see georgie boy sticking up for this pedophile-enabler.

    why am i not surprised?
    because he's a fucking dipshit idiot that does what people tell him.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    ever take into account what hastert has to say about it?

    http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2519590


    I agree, if he covered something up, he should resign but I'm not going to convict him just because he is a republican. I think he should be given a chance to explain his side.
  • DPrival78DPrival78 Posts: 2,263
    Scratchin a Letter wrote:
    because he's a fucking dipshit idiot that does what people tell him.

    that more or less sums it up
    i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam
  • DPrival78DPrival78 Posts: 2,263
    "Rep. Tom Reynolds, the House GOP campaign chairman, said he told Hastert in the spring of this year about the questionable e-mail. Hastert says he does not recall the conversation but does not dispute Reynolds' account."

    some one tells him, in his position, that a congressman is sending sexually explicit emails to an underaged boy, and he "doesn't recall"?
    please..

    i wonder if he would have recalled if the emails were coming from a democrat..
    i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    DPrival78 wrote:
    "Rep. Tom Reynolds, the House GOP campaign chairman, said he told Hastert in the spring of this year about the questionable e-mail. Hastert says he does not recall the conversation but does not dispute Reynolds' account."

    some one tells him, in his position, somebody is sending sexually explicit emails to an underaged boy, and he "doesn't recall"?
    please..


    was it a questionable email or sexually explicit? you seemed to change it up a bit there.
  • DPrival78DPrival78 Posts: 2,263
    jlew24asu wrote:
    was it a questionable email or sexually explicit? you seemed to change it up a bit there.

    it was sexually explicit apparently.. or we wouldn't be discussing this.
    i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    DPrival78 wrote:
    it was sexually explicit apparently.. or we wouldn't be discussing this.


    thats the point, Hastert didnt know it was sexually explicit at the time. according to him.

    I'm just trying to call it like I see it and be fair. if he is guilty of something then he should resign. no question about it.
  • EricastradaEricastrada Posts: 70
    Now we are just arguing semantics. If I were to say some one is sending questionable e-mails to an underage child, what would be the first thing you would think of? Whats it matter if they were "questionable" or "sexually explicit" when it involves a 50 year old Congressman sending messages to a 16 year old page? Something should have been done either way.
    Show me potato salald!!!
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Ericastrada wrote:
    Now we are just arguing semantics. If I were to say some one is sending questionable e-mails to an underage child, what would be the first thing you would think of? Whats it matter if they were "questionable" or "sexually explicit" when it involves a 50 year old Congressman sending messages to a 16 year old page? Something should have been done either way.


    yea I agree but we have no idea what was discussed. according to hastert it didnt even make it to his desk. his aides passed it on to someone else.
  • EricastradaEricastrada Posts: 70
    jlew24asu wrote:
    yea I agree but we have no idea what was discussed. according to hastert it didnt even make it to his desk. his aides passed it on to someone else.

    I don't know about where you work, but this excuse definately wouldn't fly with my boss.
    Show me potato salald!!!
  • robbierobbie Posts: 883
    like i said in another post...... it is obvious that Hastert knows more than he is telling. and with the president of the united states supporting this, there is a good chance he knows more than he is telling as well. if they are covering up for one person molesting children, how many other children are being molested? there is no way to know, and we have no way of getting them to tell us the truth. OR DO WE?????????????????? this same bunch did just come up with a GREAT idea on how to get the truth out of people dindt they? because torture is now SO PATRIOTIC, i say we give it a go. lets see if it works, IN THE ANME OF NATIONAL SECURITY! we need to take the president of the united states, and thwe speaker of the house and test our new patriotic ways of getting information. they need to be RAPED, strapped upside down to boards and nearly drowned with water, they need to be stacked naked into pyramids for long periods of time, they need to stand hooded on a box with electrodes attached to their genitals, they need to watch while someone rapes thier wives and daughters, they need to stand naked freezing in a cold room deprived of sleep for days at a time. they need to have their heads dunked in shit-filled toilets, they need to be suffocated to the brink of death. this is the only way to get the truth out of them. WE ALL KNOW NONE OF THIS WOULD GET THEM TO FALSELY CONFESS OR GIVE FAULTY INFORMATION TO GET THE TORTURE TO STOP. and isnt it worth it to protect whatever children the republicans might be raping? they have PROVEN that there is no other way we can get the truth out of them. and it is very important that we find out if these PATRIOTIC techniques work.
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    I can already hear the sound bite...
    "You're doin' a heckuva job Denny"
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • floyd1975floyd1975 Posts: 1,350
    jlew24asu wrote:
    ever take into account what hastert has to say about it?

    http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2519590


    I agree, if he covered something up, he should resign but I'm not going to convict him just because he is a republican. I think he should be given a chance to explain his side.

    Here's more. It looks like the newspaper didn't think much of it either.

    http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/10/hastert_wants_f.html
  • puremagicpuremagic Posts: 1,907
    If the boy's parents approached Hastert because of e-mails being received by their son from Foley, you know those e-mails were not of normal conversations. What parent wouldn't want to keep their child out of the media involving a sexual male/male scandal regardless of the boy's age. The parents had every right to try and protect their son's privacy by acting accordingly, thinking it would be handled quietly. Sorry, I believe Hastert knew and did nothing and Bush should not be supporting him.
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    Maf54 (8:08:31 PM): get a ruler and measure it for me
    Xxxxxxxxx (8:08:38 PM): ive already told you that
    Maf54 (8:08:47 PM): tell me again
    Xxxxxxxxx (8:08:49 PM): 7 and 1/2
    Maf54 (8:09:04 PM): ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
    Maf54 (8:09:08 PM): beautiful
    Xxxxxxxxx (8:09:38 PM): lol
    Maf54 (8:09:44 PM): thats a great size
    Xxxxxxxxx (8:10:00 PM): thank you
    Maf54 (8:10:22 PM): still stiff
    Xxxxxxxxx (8:10:28 PM): ya
    Maf54 (8:10:40 PM): take it out
    Xxxxxxxxx (8:10:54 PM): brb...my mom is yelling

    Oh dear lord...Foley is fucking sick
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
Sign In or Register to comment.