Home› A Moving Train

was 7/7 really what it was made out to be?

DPrival78DPrival78 CT Posts: 2,263
edited July 2006 in A Moving Train
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2006/070706doesntanswer.htm

maybe, maybe not
i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    Oh goody, there just arent enough nutty conspiracy theories out there.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • worldworld Posts: 266
    Please erase prisonplanet.com from your bookmarks. As a favor for yourself and us.
    Chicago '98, Noblesville '00, East Troy '00, Chicago '00, Champaign '03, Chicago '03, Chicago1 '06, Chicago2 '06, Milwaukee '06, Chicago1 '09, and Chicago2 '09
  • DPrival78DPrival78 CT Posts: 2,263
    world wrote:
    Please erase prisonplanet.com from your bookmarks. As a favor for yourself and us.

    just to be annoying.. why?
    i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    apparently others don't want to even read the article let along discuss it...i just got done reading that article a little before you posted it...very interesting
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • AbookamongstthemanyAbookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    If would be so refreshing if the nay sayers would at least post why they disagree with an article instead of just posting to belittle.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    El_Kabong wrote:
    apparently others don't want to even read the article let along discuss it...i just got done reading that article a little before you posted it...very interesting

    How come that double decker is still standing STRAIGHT UP?

    When ever double deckers are involved in tradgedy they always fall ON THIER SIDES!!! They never FALL STRAIGHT DOWN!!!

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38545000/jpg/_38545961_bus300.jpg

    http://uk.gizmodo.com/double%20decker%20bus%20crash.jpg

    These pictures are PROOF!

    All you have to do is play JENGA to know what I am talking about!
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    69charger wrote:
    How come that double decker is still standing STRAIGHT UP?

    When ever double deckers are involved in tradgedy they always fall ON THIER SIDES!!! They never FALL STRAIGHT DOWN!!!

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38545000/jpg/_38545961_bus300.jpg

    http://uk.gizmodo.com/double%20decker%20bus%20crash.jpg

    These pictures are PROOF!

    All you have to do is play JENGA to know what I am talking about!


    as always an intelligent topic related post by 69charger

    do you have any actual comments on the article DPrival posted?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    El_Kabong wrote:
    as always an intelligent topic related post by 69charger

    do you have any actual comments on the article DPrival posted?

    You got me all wrong on this one buddy! I'm on YOUR side!

    Look at this picture

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/july2006/070706bus.jpg

    Then look at these pictures

    http://uk.gizmodo.com/double%20decker%20bus%20crash.jpg

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38545000/jpg/_38545961_bus300.jpg

    Now tell me that this isn't PROOF of a CONSPIRACY and I'll eat my shoe!

    Double Decker Busses always fall TO THE SIDE!!! Not STRAIGHT DOWN!!!!
  • AbookamongstthemanyAbookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    69charger wrote:
    You got me all wrong on this one buddy! I'm on YOUR side!

    Look at this picture

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/july2006/070706bus.jpg

    Then look at these pictures

    http://uk.gizmodo.com/double%20decker%20bus%20crash.jpg

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38545000/jpg/_38545961_bus300.jpg

    Now tell me that this isn't PROOF of a CONSPIRACY and I'll eat my shoe!

    Double Decker Busses always fall TO THE SIDE!!! Not STRAIGHT DOWN!!!!

    This meek attempt at humor is all you've got on the subject? It's almost as cute as a puppy dog watching you get so excited when you think you've really done something.....but I would suggest you calm down just a tad, it's a little over played.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Abookamongstthemany wrote:
    This meek attempt at humor is all you've got on the subject? It's almost as cute as a puppy dog watching you get so excited when you think you've really done something.....but I would suggest you calm down just a tad, it's a little over played.

    Are you denying there was a conspiracy on 7/7?

    TO THE SIDE!!! Not STRAIGHT DOWN!!!!
  • AbookamongstthemanyAbookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    69charger wrote:
    Are you denying there was a conspiracy on 7/7?

    TO THE SIDE!!! Not STRAIGHT DOWN!!!!

    Yawn...
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Abookamongstthemany wrote:
    Yawn...

    STRAIGHT DOWN!!!!
  • Will1659Will1659 Posts: 51
    I disagree with 69charger on a lot of stuff, but I laughed at his posts here. And the reason no one wants to "respond substantively" to an article like the one posted is that we have learned, over the years, to stop trying to use reason on people who will then refuse to listen to or process it.
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    The people who close their minds to possibilities, and who degrade contrary views get to reap what they sow. When they display disrespect in doing so, they reveal their own lack of respect for all to see.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    angelica wrote:
    The people who close their minds to possibilities, and who degrade contrary views get to reap what they sow. When they display disrespect in doing so, they reveal their own lack of respect for all to see.

    If you think I have anything less than 100% disrespect for conspiracy theorists, you are 100% correct.

    Have a nice day ;)
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    69charger wrote:
    If you think I have anything less than 100% disrespect for conspiracy theorists, you are 100% correct.

    Have a nice day ;)

    I'm aware that you give yourself permission to be disrespectful. Have a nice day, too. :)
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • fridgehopperfridgehopper Posts: 18
    One thing that pisses me off about that article is how they make out that Jean Charles De Menezes did nothing suspicious, they make it sound as if the police just picked him out of random passers by and shot him.

    I know it turned out he was innocent, and they shot the wrong man, but I remember watching the news the day it happened, and if I had been a police officer on duty that day, in that same situation, I would have probably shot too. Remember, Jean was killed 15 days after 7/7, and 1 day after more suspected terrorist attacks. He fitted the description of a terrorist suspect, and when approached by police officers, instead of doing the rational thing, he ran away from them, straight for a station, and ran the whole way through it, leaping barriers, and bolted for a train. The officers repeatedly asked him to stop running, and shot out at the last minute when he was about to board the train. That to me is not how an innocent person would act, and although he was innocent, can you imagine what would have happened if he had been carrying a bomb, and they had let him get on the train? They are damned if they do, and damned if they don't, and that whole article is a farce!

    Some interesting articles relating to what I just posted:

    http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=1303&id=1670842005

    http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=1303&id=1669962005
  • FinsburyParkCarrotsFinsburyParkCarrots Seattle, WA Posts: 12,223
    Check the date on those articles.

    Now, read this:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Charles_de_Menezes
  • rightonduderightondude Posts: 745
    69charger wrote:
    Are you denying there was a conspiracy on 7/7?

    TO THE SIDE!!! Not STRAIGHT DOWN!!!!

    I dunno but I do see some humor in this. Regardless of your views.

    Your persistence factor adds some charm as well. hehe...
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    fridgehopper wrote:
    and when approached by police officers, instead of doing the rational thing, he ran away from them, straight for a station, and ran the whole way through it, leaping barriers, and bolted for a train. The officers repeatedly asked him to stop running, and shot out at the last minute when he was about to board the train.

    That is all bollocks. He didn't run away from the police. He didn't leap any barrier, and he wasn't approached by Police officers. Get your facts right!

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4176148.stm

    "Leaked documents contradict previous accounts of the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes.

    Appearing to be from the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) inquiry into the shooting and leaked to ITV News, they suggest the Brazilian was restrained before being shot eight times.

    They contradict eyewitness reports suggesting Mr Menezes jumped a barrier at Stockwell Tube station and was wearing a padded jacket that could have concealed a bomb.

    They suggest he was wearing a denim jacket and walked into the station, picked up a free newspaper and walked through ticket barriers. It is suggested he only started to run when he saw a train arriving and was sitting down when he was shot."
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    fridgehopper wrote:
    One thing that pisses me off about that article is how they make out that Jean Charles De Menezes did nothing suspicious, they make it sound as if the police just picked him out of random passers by and shot him.


    actually that's pretty much what did happen
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
Sign In or Register to comment.