War Money Going To Taxpayers

onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
edited July 2007 in A Moving Train
as a business man; i always follow the money. i see where it's being spent and try to find a way to intercept at least some of it. so where is the war money going?
first; government contracts go to businesses that make parts used in war.
employers hire people to make the parts.
employees get paid.
our chicago plant is knocking out airplane parts like never before. more employees have been added to handle the increased work load. so that money is being spent in america thus stimulating the economy. and if you look closely; every war has stimulated technology too.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    I believe this.

    It is Exhibit A for the idea that there is more to life than money.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    so it's ok to let people die if it stimulates the economy......:rolleyes:
  • RushlimboRushlimbo Posts: 832
    as a business man; i always follow the money. i see where it's being spent and try to find a way to intercept at least some of it. so where is the war money going?
    first; government contracts go to businesses that make parts used in war.
    employers hire people to make the parts.
    employees get paid.
    our chicago plant is knocking out airplane parts like never before. more employees have been added to handle the increased work load. so that money is being spent in america thus stimulating the economy. and if you look closely; every war has stimulated technology too.

    Wow, war or threatened war means more jobs and profits !?! How has this secret been kept so long? If the guys in Washington and their wealthy buddies figure this out then they may try to use this info to make themselves more wealthy. Shhhhhhhhhh................
    War is Peace
    Freedom is Slavery
    Ignorance is Strength
  • RockinInCanadaRockinInCanada Posts: 2,016
    I thought this knowledge was readily known...especially on this board....
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    cutback wrote:
    so it's ok to let people die if it stimulates the economy......:rolleyes:

    Be careful, though, because the poster did not say or even imply this. Though I have heard people say that we need war for these reasons.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    Be careful, though, because the poster did not say or even imply this. Though I have heard people say that we need war for these reasons.

    i could give two shits if ols didn't say it, and i'm sure at some point he'll give me some wonderful explanation on making profits at the expense of human lives....
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    cutback wrote:
    i could give two shits if ols didn't say it, and i'm sure at some point he'll give me some wonderful explanation on making profits at the expense of human lives....

    Well if so, I've got your back. ;)
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    Well if so, I've got your back. ;)


    ;)

    don't get me wrong i understand the war-economy relationship......i just think it's really offensive to be happy about it....
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    cutback wrote:
    ;)

    don't get me wrong i understand the war-economy relationship......i just think it's really offensive to be happy about it....

    As do I. I was just saying that there is not much (maybe a slight) tone of that in that particular post.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    So if they were to hit the warehouse that is making those pieces that are aiding to kill people, the American public would be able to somehow comprehend that a little better then 911?
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • THCTHC Posts: 525
    I was an ecomomics major in undergrad...so i hear your point in how it stimulates the economy. However, to say war is worth the stimulation is a pretty bleak take on life and the world and our fellow human beings, both american and Iraqi who have lost their lives because of this war.

    You know what else could stimulate the economy? Lets say some public works campaigns similar to what the gov't did during the depression. OR BETTER YET...what do you say we make some major laws to clean up the environment...and your plant begins producing parts that go to generators that make cleaner air from factories! Or gov't initiative that pay corporations to make more fuel efficient cars. Or contracts to cure some diseases! There are many...many other options to stimulate the economy other then WAR! Or how bout we build some better schools in AMERICA instead of flushing $12Billion/month into Iraq.
    “Kept in a small bowl, the goldfish will remain small. With more space, the fish can grow double, triple, or quadruple its size.”
    -Big Fish
  • callencallen Posts: 6,388
    cutback wrote:
    ;)

    don't get me wrong i understand the war-economy relationship......i just think it's really offensive to be happy about it....

    you see this mess....you supported it...and now you try to justify...human nature. Is pretty twisted....but we are just humans.
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    the same thing can be said for NASA's budget. Every single dollar is spent here on earth, paying Americans.

    Personally, I'd rather spend my money exploring Mars than on killing people.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    cutback wrote:
    so it's ok to let people die if it stimulates the economy......:rolleyes:

    Who "lets" people die?

    Doesn't everybody die?
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    THC wrote:
    I was an ecomomics major in undergrad...so i hear your point in how it stimulates the economy. However, to say war is worth the stimulation is a pretty bleak take on life and the world and our fellow human beings, both american and Iraqi who have lost their lives because of this war.

    You know what else could stimulate the economy? Lets say some public works campaigns similar to what the gov't did during the depression. OR BETTER YET...what do you say we make some major laws to clean up the environment...and your plant begins producing parts that go to generators that make cleaner air from factories! Or gov't initiative that pay corporations to make more fuel efficient cars. Or contracts to cure some diseases! There are many...many other options to stimulate the economy other then WAR! Or how bout we build some better schools in AMERICA instead of flushing $12Billion/month into Iraq.

    first of all; i never said i was happy about it.
    secondly; i never said it was worth it.
    the purpose of this thread was to point out to the people who day after day talk about 16 billion dollars (or whatever the amount) being burned to cook hot dogs. through out history; war has always helped the economy. war pulled us out of the great depression. the exception would be the gulf war. not enough equipment and arms were lost to require replacement.

    now; how do you build better schools or more efficient anything if the populous isn't working? this is done through taxes. if people aren't earning money they are not paying taxes. in fact; they're causing a negative economy by needing to draw from social services.

    my youngest son left for iraq a week ago today. the thought of it makes me ill. i've slept 2 hours in the past 2 days. but it doesn't change the fact that part of the money you're bitching about is going to pay my son for serving and risking his life. some of that money is going towards equipment to keep him safer. and some of that money is going towards being prepared because every other damn country calls on the us to help them when they get their teat in the ringer.
    of all the countries the us has lent money to; i believe only poland has paid the us back. when american money was used to help rebuild a war torn europe (twice in 26 years) there wasn't a thank you. only a kick in the arse and a get the hell out when we were finished.
    collecting the money other countries owe us would give us socialized healthcare; the best schools; feed our poor; and provide funding for new technology to save the earth we killed. if you're emitting pollution; you're not only killing billions of people now; but many generations to come. if you think you're not killing people; start up your car and wrap your mouth around the exhaust pipe. for every soldier killed in iraq; you're killing 10,000. including yourself and your family.
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    godpt3 wrote:
    the same thing can be said for NASA's budget. Every single dollar is spent here on earth, paying Americans.

    Personally, I'd rather spend my money exploring Mars than on killing people.

    well guess what? next year nasa starts it's program to start harvesting helium3 from the moon and there's enough helium3 to provide clean safe power for the entire world for 1000 years.
    is that a good enough reason for you?
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    The only way this whole thing works is if people pay taxes for parts and assembly of weapons systems... instead of hiding their money away in off shore accounts to avoid paying their fair share.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,616
    The war may stimulate commerce, but all of the products are being bought buy the government with our tax dollars, so all it does is redistribute the wealth.

    It is not like tourism, where foreign money gets spent here by people who earned it elsewhere.
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    The war may stimulate commerce, but all of the products are being bought buy the government with our tax dollars, so all it does is redistribute the wealth.

    It is not like tourism, where foreign money gets spent here by people who earned it elsewhere.

    but isn't that the normal cycle of things? you collect your check and distribute it to the stores; auto workers; etc. then some goes to the farmers and steel companies. the farmers distribute it to the tractor and seed companies and also buy the products you're making. when money follows the cycle; the economy thrives.
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    the way i see it; there should be a lifetime limit on taxes. $2 million sounds fair and wouldn't effect 80% of the population. once you've paid the government $2 million; your income taxes cease.
    what people don't see is that someone can pay $ millions in inheretence taxes for receiving money a family member already paid taxes on; then still be required to pay income taxes.
    so the wealthy don't donate < 1% to charity; the government is the charity. they distribute it for the good of all the people. welfare; medicare; medicaid; police; fire services. they also offer research grants and all kinds of services to benefit the people.
    you asked for these services and you asked the government to provide them. why not thank the wealthy for keeping your taxes from being any higher than they are?
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,616
    but isn't that the normal cycle of things? you collect your check and distribute it to the stores; auto workers; etc. then some goes to the farmers and steel companies. the farmers distribute it to the tractor and seed companies and also buy the products you're making. when money follows the cycle; the economy thrives.

    yes, but there is a much narrower array of companies receiving money during wartime.
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    yes, but there is a much narrower array of companies receiving money during wartime.

    i don't know joe. it used to be that way but with everything being computerized and weapons being so specialized; i think that's changed. just about everything is used in wartime. from the farmers that supply the food to microsoft software. i could be wrong. i base my opinion on kentucky windage and not any known stats.
    my kid left for iraq last week so don't think i'm in favour of war. i'm just trying to be realistic compared to those who believe that money isn't being used here.
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Okay... I have a question here...
    ...
    How does the money that is getting shipped off to Iraq... like into the Iraqi Government's coffers... get spent here by our workers? Are the Iraqis placing orders for F-22 Raptors? Or are we lending them the money to buy the weapons they will need to stand themselves up?
    And IF... the Iraqis are using money they are getting from oil revenues to purchase weapons to defend themselves... why are American tax dollars going to them?
    How is money spent in and on Iraq... helping average Joe Workingstiff here in the U.S.A?
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    know1 wrote:
    Who "lets" people die?

    Doesn't everybody die?
    yea, but it seems like the US gov't has this habit of speeding that process up.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    know1 wrote:
    Who "lets" people die?

    Doesn't everybody die?

    Everybody dies eventually. That doesn't mean that we should regard it as par for the course that men, women, and children are being blown to bits, shot, maimed and tortured.
Sign In or Register to comment.