And You Still Fall For It

onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
edited August 2007 in A Moving Train
as someone who is 100% solar; i'm sick of people saying that more money needs to be spent finding alternative fuel/energy sources. we've had the technology since the 1960's. want proof? what powers satellites; rockets; and the space shuttle? how long have we had solar powered satellites? is solar power that unreliable that we'll use it on billion dollar satellites and space probes?
stop listening to what you're told and look around you. oil is here because you're willing to buy it; not because we need it.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • my parents use solar energy to light up their yard at night, which i suppose is a start,... as soon as i get out of this apartment after i graduate, im looking to solar power to save money,...
    you're a real hooker. im gonna slap you in public.
    ~Ron Burgundy
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    uhhh ... i hear what yer saying and i'm in agreement however, those are horrible examples as they are no other options for energy plus, there is no cloud cover so access to the sun can only be blocked by planets and moons ...
  • HartydogHartydog Posts: 2,060
    It's a cost issue as well. Compared to other energy sources solar is more expensive per kilowatt hour. Although that is coming down.
    Boston 9-28-04, 5-24-06, 5-25-06, 5-17-10, 8-5-16, 8-7-16, 9-2-18, 9-4-18
    Ft Worth 9-15-23
    Hartford 5-13-06, 6-27-08, 10-25-13
    Mansfield, MA 6-30-08, 6-28-08, 7-2-03, 7-3-03, 7-11-03, 8-29-00, 8-30-00, 9-15-98, 9-16-98
    Worcester 10-15-13, 10-16-13
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    polaris wrote:
    uhhh ... i hear what yer saying and i'm in agreement however, those are horrible examples as they are no other options for energy plus, there is no cloud cover so access to the sun can only be blocked by planets and moons ...

    if you check into green communities you'll see people have been using solar power for years. my neighbor put up a couple panels and a small wind generator so when it's cloudy; there's usually wind. in fact; as you drive accross the us you will see wind farms everywhere. the power company pays the land owners to put up the turbines on his land and the power companies use the technology to sell the power back to you. my neighbor paid $500 usd for his wind generator which is less than most HDTVs. it mounts on a piece of water pipe and he installed it himself. it only requires an 8 mph wind to start generating.
    if you don't have sun or wind; you usually have streams for hydro electric generators. batteries have come a long way too.
    http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/10/new_nanotechnol.php
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    Hartydog wrote:
    It's a cost issue as well. Compared to other energy sources solar is more expensive per kilowatt hour. Although that is coming down.

    unless you're buying commercially - it's hard to determine what the cost is because it is primarily an upfront capital cost ... and your payback would be based on what the subsidized market rate is ...

    and onelongsong - i don't disagree one bit just that the examples you use (space satellites and rockets) aren't great examples is all ...
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    Hartydog wrote:
    It's a cost issue as well. Compared to other energy sources solar is more expensive per kilowatt hour. Although that is coming down.

    my system paid for itself in 1 year. i use more power on this ranch so maybe a little sooner. my most expensive component was a propane generator which automatically kicks in if my batteries drop to a certain point. i need 2 full days of clouds for that to happen. i have a massive freezer to store the meat i sell and i also have a waterbed so i'm not scrimping on power usage.
    at my old ranch i would lose power at least once a week. with solar i've never lost power so reliability is an important issue.
    i've lived with solar power for well over a year and i'd never go back to the grid. well; except maybe to sell power back to the power company.
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    polaris wrote:
    unless you're buying commercially - it's hard to determine what the cost is because it is primarily an upfront capital cost ... and your payback would be based on what the subsidized market rate is ...

    and onelongsong - i don't disagree one bit just that the examples you use (space satellites and rockets) aren't great examples is all ...

    i used those examples because the government uses it on billion dollar equipment that can't have problems. some of the older green communities have been using solar power since the 60's but there's really no documentation publicly available. so the only example that everyone is aware of is the governments use of solar power. i suppose you can use the information boards seen along the interstates and remote cell phone towers that opperate on solar power. and a lot of railroad equipment uses solar power too. in fact; if you look for them; you'll see many examples along the highway where several companies use solar power in remote locations where in most cases; bringing the grid in is just too expensive.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    as someone who is 100% solar; i'm sick of people saying that more money needs to be spent finding alternative fuel/energy sources. we've had the technology since the 1960's. want proof? what powers satellites; rockets; and the space shuttle? how long have we had solar powered satellites? is solar power that unreliable that we'll use it on billion dollar satellites and space probes?
    stop listening to what you're told and look around you. oil is here because you're willing to buy it; not because we need it.

    living in the city doesn't give you much choice, esp when you're renting. the companies have a lock.

    as to cars... you cant buy a car that is not sold. id be happy to buy a solar car if i could find one. as is, ill buy a hybrid once i get to the point where i want a new one.
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    living in the city doesn't give you much choice, esp when you're renting. the companies have a lock.

    as to cars... you cant buy a car that is not sold. id be happy to buy a solar car if i could find one. as is, ill buy a hybrid once i get to the point where i want a new one.

    we've had dual fuel cars and hybrids here for a long time. the bloke that installed my array builds units on trailers for people who rent or builders working on sites without electricity. there's always a way.
  • tybirdtybird Posts: 17,388
    i used those examples because the government uses it on billion dollar equipment that can't have problems. .
    Satellites and the Space Shuttle (in orbit) don't have the atmosphere to deal with, and the sun shines 24 hours a day.
    All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a thousand enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    tybird wrote:
    Satellites and the Space Shuttle (in orbit) don't have the atmosphere to deal with, and the sun shines 24 hours a day.

    my ranch is on earth and i generate 12 kwh every day for 18 months so far.
  • tybirdtybird Posts: 17,388
    my ranch is on earth and i generate 12 kwh every day for 18 months so far.
    Not doubting you....just noting that comparing solar power use inside the atmosphere to solar power use outside the atmosphere is kind of an apples to oranges argument.
    All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a thousand enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    tybird wrote:
    Not doubting you....just noting that comparing solar power use inside the atmosphere to solar power use outside the atmosphere is kind of an apples to oranges argument.

    technology is still technology whether it's on earth or not.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    as someone who is 100% solar; i'm sick of people saying that more money needs to be spent finding alternative fuel/energy sources. we've had the technology since the 1960's. want proof? what powers satellites; rockets; and the space shuttle? how long have we had solar powered satellites? is solar power that unreliable that we'll use it on billion dollar satellites and space probes?
    stop listening to what you're told and look around you. oil is here because you're willing to buy it; not because we need it.

    solar power is going to power our cars? all 200,000,000 million of them?
  • tybirdtybird Posts: 17,388
    technology is still technology whether it's on earth or not.
    I am not calling the technology into question.....the availability and the efficiency of the power source makes it an apples to oranges comparison.
    All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a thousand enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    as someone who is 100% solar; i'm sick of people saying that more money needs to be spent finding alternative fuel/energy sources. we've had the technology since the 1960's. want proof? what powers satellites; rockets; and the space shuttle? how long have we had solar powered satellites? is solar power that unreliable that we'll use it on billion dollar satellites and space probes?
    stop listening to what you're told and look around you. oil is here because you're willing to buy it; not because we need it.

    Solar power is used in the space program because it doesn't require the vehicle to carry additional fuel. Also, the Space Shuttle gets power on orbit from fuel cells, the Space Station does get it's power from the Sun.
  • ScubascottScubascott Posts: 815
    So rockets and the space shuttle are solar powered now? Huh. You learn something new everyday. I guess that enourmous red tank full of liquid hydrogen on the space shuttle is just for decoration then. . .
    It doesn't matter if you're male, female, or confused; black, white, brown, red, green, yellow; gay, lesbian; redneck cop, stoned; ugly; military style, doggy style; fat, rich or poor; vegetarian or cannibal; bum, hippie, virgin; famous or drunk-you're either an asshole or you're not!

    -C Addison
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    as someone who is 100% solar; i'm sick of people saying that more money needs to be spent finding alternative fuel/energy sources. we've had the technology since the 1960's. want proof? what powers satellites; rockets; and the space shuttle? how long have we had solar powered satellites? is solar power that unreliable that we'll use it on billion dollar satellites and space probes?
    stop listening to what you're told and look around you. oil is here because you're willing to buy it; not because we need it.

    so this is the "experiment" huh

    :rolleyes:
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    my2hands wrote:
    so this is the "experiment" huh

    :rolleyes:


    I was thinking the same thing. It is tough to get positive posts when the OP start out by talking about "falling for it" and "sick of people who..."

    That will immediately cause people to get defensive. Even when people were agreeing with him in principle he was mildly antagonistic.

    So I'm not really sure what kinds of responses he hoped to illicit. I like OLS's evangelizing about alternate energy, and he has a lot of good experience, but I don't really think this was a particularly valid experiment.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    The environment was the only topic I wouldn't take good old OLS up on. I couldn't find any disagreement there, regardless of his approach.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    jeffbr wrote:

    So I'm not really sure what kinds of responses he hoped to illicit...

    I would guess he hoped to illicit the very lack of responses he recieved so he could talk about how hypocritical lefty environmentalists are.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    Just what this thread needed, a ringing endorsement from this guy. LOL!

    A guy who routinely ignores the message and bemoans the approach. But suddenly, the message is more important. Awesome.....simply awesome!


    Gotta' love it!
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    gue_barium wrote:
    The environment was the only topic I wouldn't take good old OLS up on. I couldn't find any disagreement there, regardless of his approach.

    I don't think anybody really disagreed with his points about the need to explore alternative energy sources, and he provided good info about feasability and availability of solar power, but the tone of the thread caused the "experiment" to be less than successful for him. I happen to think the tone produced the results I would have expected. If he'd come in cheerily saying he has some information he wanted to share, people would have been more open to receiving it. That's my only point. Tone/approach of the first post goes a long way toward shaping the rest of the tone of the thread. And since this thread was supposed to be a grand experiment, more thought could probably have gone into the initial post.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    I would guess he hoped to illicit the very lack of responses he recieved so he could talk about how hypocritical lefty environmentalists are.
    Maybe. Probably.

    The Pride and Futility mo, again.

    Still, he's fairly eloquent when it comes to things environmental.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    jeffbr wrote:
    I don't think anybody really disagreed with his points about the need to explore alternative energy sources, and he provided good info about feasability and availability of solar power, but the tone of the thread caused the "experiment" to be less than successful for him. I happen to think the tone produced the results I would have expected. If he'd come in cheerily saying he has some information he wanted to share, people would have been more open to receiving it. That's my only point. Tone/approach of the first post goes a long way toward shaping the rest of the tone of the thread. And since this thread was supposed to be a grand experiment, more thought could probably have gone into the initial post.

    That's just OLS being OLS. He loves being a BS'r.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    jeffbr wrote:
    I was thinking the same thing. It is tough to get positive posts when the OP start out by talking about "falling for it" and "sick of people who..."

    That will immediately cause people to get defensive. Even when people were agreeing with him in principle he was mildly antagonistic.

    So I'm not really sure what kinds of responses he hoped to illicit. I like OLS's evangelizing about alternate energy, and he has a lot of good experience, but I don't really think this was a particularly valid experiment.

    i agree
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    jeffbr wrote:
    I don't think anybody really disagreed with his points about the need to explore alternative energy sources, and he provided good info about feasability and availability of solar power, but the tone of the thread caused the "experiment" to be less than successful for him. I happen to think the tone produced the results I would have expected. If he'd come in cheerily saying he has some information he wanted to share, people would have been more open to receiving it. That's my only point. Tone/approach of the first post goes a long way toward shaping the rest of the tone of the thread. And since this thread was supposed to be a grand experiment, more thought could probably have gone into the initial post.

    Nicely said.

    If one is inclined to say it nicely :D
Sign In or Register to comment.