Home› A Moving Train

A Hypothetical:

saveuplifesaveuplife Posts: 1,173
edited November 2008 in A Moving Train
Is it wrong to abort a gay child if a gay gene is found?
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    saveuplife wrote:
    Is it wrong to abort a gay child if a gay gene is found?

    If you believe that abortion should be legal then yes you should also support the parent's decision to abort the child because it may be gay.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    depends on your own personal morality, doesn't it?
    right now, a woman may choose abortion simply b/c she does not want to complete the pregnancy, so while some may find that morally repugnant alone....and other factors, which also may be considered repugnant....would still be viable options. people abort for mental disabilities such as downs syndrome - and i am in NO way comparing homosexuality to a disability - just point out that having 'criteria' for abortion already exists. if abortion is legal, as it should be, it's up to the pregnant girl/women to decide. period.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • saveuplifesaveuplife Posts: 1,173
    chiefojibwa wrote:
    this thread should be aborted.


    I think it raises an interesting point, actually.
  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    Motives are irrelevant in this case. The law is the law.

    I can certainly see how this thread came about; "oh, I know. I'll pit those liberals' support of abortion against their love for gay rights. How clever; that'll get 'em." Good job.
  • urbanhippieurbanhippie Posts: 3,007
    Should homosexuality be tested for in unborn babies? That seems to be the bigger question for me.

    I am pro-choice btw.
    A human being that was given to fly.

    Wembley 18/06/07

    If there was a reason, it was you.

    O2 Arena 18/09/09
  • saveuplifesaveuplife Posts: 1,173
    decides2dream wrote:
    depends on your own personal morality, doesn't it?
    right now, a woman may choose abortion simply b/c she does not want to complete the pregnancy, so while some may find that morally repugnant alone....and other factors, which also may be considered repugnant....would still be viable options. people abort for mental disabilities such as downs syndrome - and i am in NO way comparing homosexuality to a disability - just point out that having 'criteria' for abortion already exists. if abortion is legal, as it should be, it's up to the pregnant girl/women to decide. period.


    Fair enough, but do "you" consider it wrong to abort a child because it's gay?
  • saveuplifesaveuplife Posts: 1,173
    digster wrote:
    Motives are irrelevant in this case. The law is the law.

    I can certainly see how this thread came about; "oh, I know. I'll pit those liberals' support of abortion against their love for gay rights. How clever; that'll get 'em." Good job.


    No, actually it was a bill presented to congress that put forth the idea. But, thanks for the unnecessary rhetoric.
  • WildsWilds Posts: 4,329
    Is it wrong to abort a straight child if a no gay gene is found?










    Same stupid question. I would think the answer would be the same from each person to both questions.
  • Kel VarnsenKel Varnsen Posts: 1,952
    It is an interesting question, especailly because of the fact that it would seem that people who are very anti-gay would also be very anti-abortion. Then again most people who feel that strongly would probably not believe in the accuracy of a "gay gene" test to begin with.
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    saveuplife wrote:
    Fair enough, but do "you" consider it wrong to abort a child because it's gay?




    my personal morality is just that....my own...personal...morality. i do not discuss such things on public message boards. just how i am, like to keep em guessing.


    honestly, i think i made myself clear: it is up to the mother. it's not my place to make that judgement call and since i will never be getting pregnant, it's not something i would ever have to consider. i may thing it's the wrong choice for me to make...but since i don't have to make it...i won't say what's right or wrong for another woman.



    wilds...you pretty much hit it spot on.





    better question - if a gay gene WERE discovered, do you think there may be a rise in abortions amongst those on the religious right?


    as i don't have a problem with abortion, whatever criteria a woman chooses is her own.



    *edit - kel....yea, exactly what i was thinking.......
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    saveuplife wrote:
    Fair enough, but do "you" consider it wrong to abort a child because it's gay?

    I am pro choice but I personally think that it is wrong to abort any child, unless there is evidence of severe birth defects or health issues. That is my morality, but I don't feel comfortable legislating what I feel is right or wrong.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    saveuplife wrote:
    No, actually it was a bill presented to congress that put forth the idea. But, thanks for the unnecessary rhetoric.

    OK, saveup.
    Nevetheless, the law is the law. If doctors are not required to demand motives when performing an abortion, than the question is moot.
  • PJ_SalukiPJ_Saluki Posts: 1,006
    saveuplife wrote:
    I think it raises an interesting point, actually.

    What's your take?
    "Almost all those politicians took money from Enron, and there they are holding hearings. That's like O.J. Simpson getting in the Rae Carruth jury pool." -- Charles Barkley
  • bernmodibernmodi Posts: 631
    urbanhippie wrote:
    Should homosexuality be tested for in unborn babies? That seems to be the bigger question for me.

    I am pro-choice btw.

    That's about the smartest reply to this quite stupid question.
  • Gonzo1977Gonzo1977 Posts: 1,696
    I'm Pro Choice,

    However...I strongly feel that anyone who would abort a baby because it was found to have a gay gene should do the human race a very big favor and abort themselves while their at it.

    Thank you
    Good Night.
  • Jack_C_GregoryJack_C_Gregory Posts: 540
    Would this even be an issue? Don't most ultra religious politicians believe homosexuality is a "lifestyle choice" and not biological?
  • Ms. HaikuMs. Haiku Washington DC Posts: 7,282
    I can think very poorly of particular people because of the particular reasons they choose abortion, but I will not support legislation denying the right to choose an abortion. Just like I think poorly of people who decide to have children "Because it sounds like fun!" I wouldn't legislate against their shallowness. I just wouldn't associate with them.

    Isn't there a bumper sticker, "Keep your laws out of my uterus!" That's my opinion.
    There is no such thing as leftover pizza. There is now pizza and later pizza. - anonymous
    The risk I took was calculated, but man, am I bad at math - The Mincing Mockingbird
  • Gonzo1977Gonzo1977 Posts: 1,696
    Ms. Haiku wrote:
    "Keep your laws out of my uterus!"

    I don't own a uterus...But...
    FUCK YEAH!!!
  • saveuplifesaveuplife Posts: 1,173
    PJ_Saluki wrote:
    What's your take?


    It's wrong, regardless... so of course, it's also wrong in this scenario.
  • saveuplifesaveuplife Posts: 1,173
    decides2dream wrote:
    my personal morality is just that....my own...personal...morality. i do not discuss such things on public message boards. just how i am, like to keep em guessing.

    Yea, we're all staying up late at night guessing what your personal morality is. lol


    No offense, it's great if you contribute to the conversation, but if your response is "I won't respond with my opinion",... then I don't see a reason for you to post on an opinion-based message board. It's kinda the point of being here.
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    saveuplife wrote:
    Is it wrong to abort a gay child if a gay gene is found?

    is it wrong for a gay couple to abort if it isnt?
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • saveuplifesaveuplife Posts: 1,173
    catefrances wrote:
    is it wrong for a gay couple to abort if it isnt?


    Ummm.
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    saveuplife wrote:
    Yea, we're all staying up late at night guessing what your personal morality is. lol


    No offense, it's great if you contribute to the conversation, but if your response is "I won't respond with my opinion",... then I don't see a reason for you to post on an opinion-based message board. It's kinda the point of being here.


    yes, b/c that's what i suggested....:rolleyes:



    i GAVE MY OPINION, clearly, 2x now. if you cannot decifer it, i cannot help you there. the choice lies with the mother. period. THAT's my opinion on it. my personal morality is not the discussion.


    but thanks for explaining that to me, i had no idea......


    what part of this:

    decides2dream wrote:
    honestly, i think i made myself clear: it is up to the mother. it's not my place to make that judgement call and since i will never be getting pregnant, it's not something i would ever have to consider. i may think it's the wrong choice for me to make...but since i don't have to make it...i won't say what's right or wrong for another woman.


    do you not understand?
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • WildsWilds Posts: 4,329
    saveuplife wrote:
    Ummm.

    gay=lesbian
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    saveuplife wrote:
    Ummm.

    well???
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • Gonzo1977Gonzo1977 Posts: 1,696
    This thread is turning gay.
  • saveuplifesaveuplife Posts: 1,173
    decides2dream wrote:
    yes, b/c that's what i suggested....:rolleyes:



    i GAVE MY OPINION, clearly, 2x now. if you cannot decifer it, i cannot help you there. the choice lies with the mother. period. THAT's my opinion on it. my personal morality is not the discussion.


    but thanks for explaining that to me, i had no idea......


    what part of this:





    do you not understand?

    Chillax.
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    Gonzo1977 wrote:
    This thread is turning gay.

    and a little japanese. ;):D
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • saveuplifesaveuplife Posts: 1,173
    catefrances wrote:
    well???


    It's wrong to abort period. But, honestly, I have no idea what you are talking about.
  • blondieblue227blondieblue227 Va, USA Posts: 4,509
    People use religion to justify all types of things. I attribute religion making being gay as something bad.

    It’s not a bad thing to be gay is my opinion. So why would you care if your kid is gay or not? Because your religion tells you it is a bad thing.

    Lol. religion………..and uteruses should be kept out of lawmaking.

    I would love to see a mega-conservative argue this on TV. But it’s why you created this thread huh. ;)
    *~Pearl Jam will be blasted from speakers until morale improves~*

Sign In or Register to comment.