Gore Launches concert for Global warming

miller8966miller8966 Posts: 1,450
edited February 2007 in A Moving Train
He sure loves global warming. But i mean come on the chili peppers and Sheryl Crow...who would want to see that?

By Mary Milliken

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Environmental activists led by former U.S. Vice President Al Gore announced plans on Thursday for a worldwide string of pop concerts in July featuring Sheryl Crow, Red Hot Chili Peppers and scores of others to mobilize action to stop global warming.

The Live Earth concerts on July 7 will take place in Shanghai, Sydney, Johannesburg, London and cities to be decided in Brazil, Japan and the United States.

The shows will feature more than 100 of the world's top musical acts, organizers said. In addition to Crow and the Chili Peppers, U.S. artists who have signed up include Black Eyed Peas, Bon Jovi, Kelly Clarkson, Faith Hill, Tim McGraw and rapper Snoop Dogg.


Reuters Pictures

Editors Choice: Best pictures
from the last 24 hours.
View Slideshow

Organizers of the concerts and the new campaign Save Our Selves (SOS) hope to reach a global audience of some 2 billion people through concert attendance, radio, television and Internet broadcasts.

"In order to solve the climate crisis, we have to reach billions of people," Gore said in a statement. "We are launching SOS and Live Earth to begin a process of communication that will mobilize people all over the world to take action.

"The climate crisis will only be stopped by an unprecedented and sustained global movement. We hope to jump-start that movement right here, right now, and take it to a new level on July 7, 2007," Gore said.

The Live Earth concerts follow the model of the 1985 Live Aid and 2005 Live8 international concerts organized by Irish rock star Bob Geldof.

Live Aid raised money for African famine relief and Live8 sought to pressure world leaders to eradicate the debts of the world's poorest nations.

Gore, who lost his bid for U.S. president in 2000, has since become one of the most visible activists on global warming. His "An Inconvenient Truth" documentary has been nominated for an Oscar at the February 25 Academy Awards.
America...the greatest Country in the world.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    miller8966 wrote:
    The shows will feature more than 100 of the world's top musical acts, organizers said. In addition to Crow and the Chili Peppers, U.S. artists who have signed up include Black Eyed Peas, Bon Jovi, Kelly Clarkson, Faith Hill, Tim McGraw and rapper Snoop Dogg.


    A bunch of new artists to put on the right wing "boycott" blogs.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • miller8966miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    A bunch of new artists to put on the right wing "boycott" blogs.

    I boycott them because they suck.
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    Hey Miller. You forgot to say that it better be an all acoustic set with no electricity. And that nobody should fly to it. Everyone should just walk. To not defeat the purpose. ;)
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • miller8966miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    even flow? wrote:
    Hey Miller. You forgot to say that it better be an all acoustic set with no electricity. And that nobody should fly to it. Everyone should just walk. To not defeat the purpose. ;)

    Ha very true. Shot on sight if anyone drives an SUV in.
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • I had to laugh a little when I heard about this concert. I mean what really is the point? Instead of a bunch of shitty artists, (yeah I really want to listen to Snoop Dog tell me how them glaciers is melting and shit) having people spend a bunch of money to see them play, why don't all those big name acts donate the money that will be made themselves.

    The day Snoop Dog sells all of his escalades and all the other cars I'm sure he really needs, then he can preach to me about global warming. I heard Pharell talking about this concert and he said, "on July 7th were going to have the world's biggest party." I thought the point was to learn about global warming. These people are clueless. The sad thing is this will be hyped up and in Rolling Stone and on MTV and I'm sure you will be able to buy the DVD for $50, and a week later it will be back to business as usual, private jets, gigantic energy consuming homes, 15 SUVs. Oh well, I guess global warming is just the celebrity it cause right now.
  • miller8966miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    I had to laugh a little when I heard about this concert. I mean what really is the point? Instead of a bunch of shitty artists, (yeah I really want to listen to Snoop Dog tell me how them glaciers is melting and shit) having people spend a bunch of money to see them play, why don't all those big name acts donate the money that will be made themselves.
    .

    Dude thats hysterical. I can imagine it now.

    " Yo Motha-fukas, u be smoking dat weed dat weed groww off trees B, we need Trees you dig?"
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • miller8966 wrote:
    He sure loves global warming. But i mean come on the chili peppers and Sheryl Crow...who would want to see that?

    By Mary Milliken

    LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Environmental activists led by former U.S. Vice President Al Gore announced plans on Thursday for a worldwide string of pop concerts in July featuring Sheryl Crow, Red Hot Chili Peppers and scores of others to mobilize action to stop global warming.

    The Live Earth concerts on July 7 will take place in Shanghai, Sydney, Johannesburg, London and cities to be decided in Brazil, Japan and the United States.

    The shows will feature more than 100 of the world's top musical acts, organizers said. In addition to Crow and the Chili Peppers, U.S. artists who have signed up include Black Eyed Peas, Bon Jovi, Kelly Clarkson, Faith Hill, Tim McGraw and rapper Snoop Dogg.


    Reuters Pictures

    Editors Choice: Best pictures
    from the last 24 hours.
    View Slideshow

    Organizers of the concerts and the new campaign Save Our Selves (SOS) hope to reach a global audience of some 2 billion people through concert attendance, radio, television and Internet broadcasts.

    "In order to solve the climate crisis, we have to reach billions of people," Gore said in a statement. "We are launching SOS and Live Earth to begin a process of communication that will mobilize people all over the world to take action.

    "The climate crisis will only be stopped by an unprecedented and sustained global movement. We hope to jump-start that movement right here, right now, and take it to a new level on July 7, 2007," Gore said.

    The Live Earth concerts follow the model of the 1985 Live Aid and 2005 Live8 international concerts organized by Irish rock star Bob Geldof.

    Live Aid raised money for African famine relief and Live8 sought to pressure world leaders to eradicate the debts of the world's poorest nations.

    Gore, who lost his bid for U.S. president in 2000, has since become one of the most visible activists on global warming. His "An Inconvenient Truth" documentary has been nominated for an Oscar at the February 25 Academy Awards.


    pj will be on this like flys on shit
  • pj will be on this like flys on shit

    Any PJ concert is a good concert, regardless of what they are standing up for.

    Or whether or not you chose to believe it.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    preaching the end of the world
  • Any PJ concert is a good concert, regardless of what they are standing up for.

    Or whether or not you chose to believe it.


    lol I agree.
    "Sarcasm: intellect on the offensive"

    "What I lack in decorum, I make up for with an absence of tact."

    Camden 5-28-06
    Washington, D.C. 6-22-08
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    so we're gonna have over 100 artists drive / fly their gear to different cities all over the world to raise awareness of global warming? wouldn't it be better to have them perform where they are and webcast it? that way thousands of people won't pollute the air?
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    chopitdown wrote:
    so we're gonna have over 100 artists drive / fly their gear to different cities all over the world to raise awareness of global warming? wouldn't it be better to have them perform where they are and webcast it? that way thousands of people won't pollute the air?

    Have to say I agree. The logic behind it seems backward. But then again, we are talking about Al Gore. ;)
  • gabersgabers Posts: 2,787
    Everyone likes to take shots at Al Gore. At least he is trying to make the world a better place. More than I can say for a lot of politicians. You haters might surprised in 2008. I think Gore could take Guiliani or McCain.
  • I really like Gore and I agree with him on climate but this concert is a stupid idea. I dont' think it will have any effect on the awareness about the issue and it sets a bad example more energy and jetfuel burnt. Not a good idea.
  • gabers wrote:
    Everyone likes to take shots at Al Gore. At least he is trying to make the world a better place. More than I can say for a lot of politicians. You haters might surprised in 2008. I think Gore could take Guiliani or McCain.

    He has to be in the race first. He wouldn't even win his own parties nomination.
  • dg1979usdg1979us Posts: 568
    He has to be in the race first. He wouldn't even win his own parties nomination.

    I dont think he would win either, but if he ran I would vote for him in a heartbeat. I think global warming is the biggest issue on the table at the moment, and he seems to be the only guy taking it seriously. I didnt vote for him in 2000, but he ran a terrible campaign trying to get out of Clinton's infidelity shadow. Since Gore hasnt technically been a politican, and spoken his mind more, I have gained a lot of respect for him.
  • Considering his re-birth since he left politics and his pop-culture following (not to mention his nobel nomination) I wouldn't be surprised to see him win the nomination if he were to run. Furthermore people are nostalgic for the Clinton era so his connection as VP and experience may make him a very viable candidate.

    I would love to see a Gore/Obama ticket. I think Obama is great but he could use a bit of seasoning.
  • dg1979us wrote:
    I dont think he would win either, but if he ran I would vote for him in a heartbeat. I think global warming is the biggest issue on the table at the moment, and he seems to be the only guy taking it seriously. I didnt vote for him in 2000, but he ran a terrible campaign trying to get out of Clinton's infidelity shadow. Since Gore hasnt technically been a politican, and spoken his mind more, I have gained a lot of respect for him.

    Ok I'm sure his movie was great, I didn't see it. I'm sure it did open some eyes to global warming. I also really like his and Richard Branson's prize for the person who can figure out how to reduce so much green house gas. I'm not sure what the specifics are, but I thought it was a really good idea. But this concert is so lame. Yeah lets have a bunch of music acts like Kelly Clarkson and Snoop Dog who know dick about Global Warming fly their private jets to shows, drive their SUVs with 30 people entourages, so they can preach to us about the dangers of climate change. So stupid.
  • dg1979us wrote:
    I dont think he would win either, but if he ran I would vote for him in a heartbeat. I think global warming is the biggest issue on the table at the moment, and he seems to be the only guy taking it seriously. I didnt vote for him in 2000, but he ran a terrible campaign trying to get out of Clinton's infidelity shadow. Since Gore hasnt technically been a politican, and spoken his mind more, I have gained a lot of respect for him.

    Ah no...not another Global Warming person...please say it isn't so...
    Master of Zen
  • dg1979usdg1979us Posts: 568
    Ah no...not another Global Warming person...please say it isn't so...

    Your point? Since your post lacked any signicant debate, I cant quite find your point.
  • dg1979us wrote:
    Your point? Since your post lacked any signicant debate, I cant quite find your point.

    Yeah my post was short and didn't really feel like getting into it since it's late..but mainly I was just ranting on the stupidity of the whole Global Warming media propaganda that's going on... I believe in Environmental issues but not Global warming and that humans are the ones to blame as Al Gore points out..that's all..and please don't say well.."the scientists say"...lol
    Master of Zen
  • dg1979usdg1979us Posts: 568
    Yeah my post was short and didn't really feel like getting into it since it's late..but mainly I was just ranting on the stupidity of the whole Global Warming media propaganda that's going on... I believe in Environmental issues but not Global warming and that humans are the ones to blame as Al Gore points out..that's all..and please don't say well.."the scientists say"...lol


    Yes. Who cares what people that actually study the issue would say, what am I thinking. And ya know, there is credible debate on both sides, even though, with the stuff I have read I lean towards the side that says humans are at least partly responsible. But at this point, the outcome isnt even what concerns me, it is the idea that we actually have powerful people that will take it seriously and look into it. Because if it is real, then it is the biggest threat to the world, and I would hate that we have politicians that have no concern to even looking into it.
  • Yeah my post was short and didn't really feel like getting into it since it's late..but mainly I was just ranting on the stupidity of the whole Global Warming media propaganda that's going on... I believe in Environmental issues but not Global warming and that humans are the ones to blame as Al Gore points out..that's all..and please don't say well.."the scientists say"...lol
    Ok, so you're a skeptic. Why?

    Do you accept the science behind the greenhouse effect? On what scientific basis do you contest climate change?
  • sourdough wrote:
    Ok, so you're a skeptic. Why?

    Do you accept the science behind the greenhouse effect? On what scientific basis do you contest climate change?

    I'm a skeptic because of the lack of real facts rather than specualtions..
    And Climate change and Global Warming are 2 totally different things..so I'm not sure what you want me to answer here
    Master of Zen
  • dg1979usdg1979us Posts: 568
    I'm a skeptic because of the lack of real facts rather than specualtions..
    And Climate change and Global Warming are 2 totally different things..so I'm not sure what you want me to answer here

    But dont you think there is enough information that we should at least be taking it seriously?
  • I'm a skeptic because of the lack of real facts rather than specualtions..
    And Climate change and Global Warming are 2 totally different things..so I'm not sure what you want me to answer here
    Climate change and global warming are the same thing. Global temperatures are rising, however not in the same degree. Furthermore, some areas become drier, some wetter etc, so climate change is a more descriptive term for global warming. Same phenomenon.

    Lack of real facts? How about over 650000 years of climate data including temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentrations?

    Do you dispute the greenhouse effect?
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    earth is 4,500,000,000 years old. just thought i would point that out
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    earth is 400,500,000,000 years old. just thought i would point that out
    Yes, you are correct, however during that time there has never been one species with the capability and record of being able to alter their environment in the scale that humans have. We have already demonstrated that we are capable of drastically altering the atmospheric composition when we severely damaged the ozone layer, so why do people think its such a radical idea to comprehend that we have the ability to effect our atmosphere?

    Once again, do any of the skeptics here dispute the greenhouse effect?
  • dg1979us wrote:
    But dont you think there is enough information that we should at least be taking it seriously?

    Don't get me wrong..I totally agree we should always want to be cleaner and such to our environment but I don't buy into this whole Global Warming scare..Yes some scientist say ..ooooo watch out for Global Warming.... but what about all the other scientists that say the opposite..?? and trust me there are alot of them...but the media only talks about the ones that are in agreement with Global Warming...
    Sad but true but most of the scientist that are in agreement of this Global Warming theory are getting funded to do so..of course they woulld support that theory..hell why not..they are getting $$ for it..
    And yet the others , who don't care about $$ or are retired that believe the opposite are not taken seriously.. Politicians don't want to believe that..because if they did then there goes everything !
    I'm just your average Joe but seriously...watch in 30 years...I bet there will be some other type of debate of Global Cooling or something
    Master of Zen
  • sourdough wrote:
    Climate change and global warming are the same thing. Global temperatures are rising, however not in the same degree. Furthermore, some areas become drier, some wetter etc, so climate change is a more descriptive term for global warming. Same phenomenon.

    Lack of real facts? How about over 650000 years of climate data including temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentrations?

    Do you dispute the greenhouse effect?

    WOW...they took records back 650000 years ago...in pen or pencil? lol..come on..
    Master of Zen
Sign In or Register to comment.