fuck obama/hillary/rebulblicans
Commy
Posts: 4,984
The world is controlled by economic institutions. And people think the United States is run by the president. The fact is, the WTO and the WB are our worst enemies, in charge of it all.
The wto gives a loan to a poor country. Sounds good on paper. Before that country can accept that loan they need to make certain "structural adjustments". Export, export, expor. In the words of the WTO, lowest common denominator. So Haiti exports grain to the US, recieving ht elowest possible pqyment for their primary product, while their people starve. Colombia sees coffee prices drop exponentially (forcing many of them to turn to coca-cocaine-production) to make ends meet. Meanwhile the US is getting all of these resources at bottom dollar while countries producing these products starve. THIS IS THE NEW WORLD ORDER.
The WTO grants a loan to some dictator in AFrica-he gets 2 billion, buys a house, 50 bmw's, and his people are left with the debt. Responsible countries, of which there are few, say no, and are ostracized by the international community, Venezuela for example.
The new world order is economic control. Last I checked 63 (over 150 now that i checked agaiin) countries had to make structural adjustments for the WTO-lower minimum wage, no workers rights, no health care, no unions. In ountries actually trying to dig themselves out of holes, this may be a good thing - I dont see how bu t maybe. In mos tcases, a dictator takes teh funds for himslef and lets his people suffer the repayment.
THIS IS THE NEW WORLD ORDER>
The wto gives a loan to a poor country. Sounds good on paper. Before that country can accept that loan they need to make certain "structural adjustments". Export, export, expor. In the words of the WTO, lowest common denominator. So Haiti exports grain to the US, recieving ht elowest possible pqyment for their primary product, while their people starve. Colombia sees coffee prices drop exponentially (forcing many of them to turn to coca-cocaine-production) to make ends meet. Meanwhile the US is getting all of these resources at bottom dollar while countries producing these products starve. THIS IS THE NEW WORLD ORDER.
The WTO grants a loan to some dictator in AFrica-he gets 2 billion, buys a house, 50 bmw's, and his people are left with the debt. Responsible countries, of which there are few, say no, and are ostracized by the international community, Venezuela for example.
The new world order is economic control. Last I checked 63 (over 150 now that i checked agaiin) countries had to make structural adjustments for the WTO-lower minimum wage, no workers rights, no health care, no unions. In ountries actually trying to dig themselves out of holes, this may be a good thing - I dont see how bu t maybe. In mos tcases, a dictator takes teh funds for himslef and lets his people suffer the repayment.
THIS IS THE NEW WORLD ORDER>
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
While that is true the leaders of the WTO and WB are appointed not elected...
That's all well and good when the system isn't corrupt.
I still having nothing against Obama. In my eyes he's just playing the game to get elected... Hillary Clinton needs to be stopped.
It's the elite we need to keep in line.
People don't approve of murder, unless they are scared for their own lives, which is where we are at for the most part. Sheep running scared... and most people are fat and happy where they are. Why would they want change?
If people were scared for their own lives they would ban automobiles, which kill more than terrorists ever have. Or tobacco for that matter.
The United States has the most advanced propaganda machine ever developed. taken from the Nazi's and adapted. Americans are taught to fear and want. Fear what their gov't tells them to fear and want what the tv tells them to want. To fear and covet is to be an american.
Second - the fact that the disaffected need a leader. I think there are a lot of people waiting around for someone to do something....unfortunate, but I think it's true... Maybe he will be the "told ya so" guy one day....but a little old OB/GYN talking about economics isn't going to cut it as a revolutionary leader of the masses.
I think if the economy begins to fail and discontent grows, there will be more of an appetite for REAL change.... But I think the entire US middle class would have to be in dire straits for that to happen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Voh3I2h6PBo
It's incredibly easy. Sit back and do nothing, and it will come to you
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
What?
Let me see if I understand this. You want people to be happy, right? You want people to be healthy, right? You want people to be economically secure, right? Are not all those things, selfish desires?
If altruism is your game, then what's wrong with the current world order? What's wrong with having your money given to some African dictator? What's wrong with having your time given to corporations? What's wrong with having your life used by others in whatever game that suits them? Nothing could be more altruistic than submitting yourself for use by others based not on your standards, but theirs'.
The selfish desires to own your life and your happiness are the only thing that stands between you and everything you despise. Forget that at your own demise.
Hehe...there's your answer. Most people don't want to be murdered. Most people don't want to suffer from war. That's very different than not approving of murder or wanting peace.
See, even you:
This is precisely why I often think about that we must kill to live.
Factor in the population curves internationally, and were in for some big shows and pretty soon. Common ground must be attained via agreement or force.
Therefore, in a nutshell, NWO is coming one way or the other is how I see it.
Probably in a succession of many ongoing bright flashes of light noise and smoke, the size of the flashes I'm not sure of yet, as it no one probaby at this point.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Theoretically, we don't. Practically, we must. Regardless, you don't necessarily need to kill other people to live.
Well, sure. We've also had some pretty big shows. They won't be anything new.
You can't achieve "common ground" via force. You can get someone to do what want them to do, but you can't get them to think how you want them too.
Change is coming, just like it always does. "NWO" is simply a meaningless term best left to conspiracy nuts. The last time the true order of the world changed was 10,000 years ago. Politicians, businessmen, and all the other "elite", as people will have it, aren't going to bring around a New World Order. They're simply going to bring about new schemes and technologies and organizations that will have various measures of positive or negative effects on the people who occupy this planet. "New World Order", however, is a bit of a stretch.
You're definitely right on that one, unfortunately.
Looking back that was an incorrect statement, but let me rephrase.
How can a system based on man's worst motives produces the most good?
Now we're definitely getting some where -- your question is an excellent one.
The answer is, of course, that it can't. The worst motives of men: greed, hate, bigotry and stupidity will not produce good. Unfortunately, ridding the world of those motivations is frankly impossible. All of them will exist where ever a human being exists. However, there is no reason that humans must contstruct palaces to and institutions defined by those motivations. A greedy, hatefilled, bigoted, stupid man will not have much power over the lives of others until those others grant him that power. That fact should give us hope. We don't need to rid the world of greed, hate, bigotry, or stupidity. Rather, we simply need to rid ourselves of those things and then refuse to support them in others.
The day that hate, bigotry, greed and stupidity become a product that few wish to buy will be one of the greatest days in human history. But to get there, all of us have to stop bargaining for them.
We don't need to, but, I'm beginning to see the population densities will bring this to a head.
I think past a certain point force definitely conquers, you just have to kill a lot of people to get it.
It's exactly conspiracy when it comes straight from the mouth of the former president in no uncertain terms. I think the term conspiracy "nut" is a huge misconception in and of itself. There's been plenty of conspiracy throughout time. Tons of it. The goal is centralized control, it's no mystery thats what those in power desire the most....more power and easier forms of societal control. It makes their lives much easier. Exactly what anyone would want if they were responsible for playing god to a nation. It's human nature. Same as parents desire mor control over their kids. Conspiracy?...not exactly. Actually not at all imo.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I know it's fun to call the NWO a conspiracy, but it just isn't true, I have been reading many books by different writers over the last year or two that cover the last 10 - 15 years of our history and they all seem to tie in together.
The things that bush and his cronies and the useless governments before them both in the US and the UK have been carrying out were on the cards long ago.
Voting will not affect change for the person in the street, it now really only benefits the rich, in other words the people who own the corporates. The majority of people don't see this and still think things are how the media tells them it is.
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
Absolutely.
Capitalism is the only thing that gives you a right to a general strike, as opposed to the altruistic institutions that demand your labor as a property of others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor
This is easy to say, but isn't really true. The poor have been forcing benefits out of the rich to a similar extent that the rich have been forcing benefits from the poor. Everybody is selling out to the institutions of force. It's not a problem of the poor or the rich.
The majority of people simply don't care.
In some places, sure.
Force destroys and negates. If what you want is a negative, force is certainly a great way to "get it".
For every grand conspiracy in history there have been a million conspiracy theories. Certainly many seek and abuse power. But to believe this world is controlled by a select few is to completely ignore their nearly constant failures to achieve their ends.
And i am of the opinion that the majority of people are plain stupid.
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.