The real reasons Israel invaded Lebanon

Commy

1)They intended to bomb the cities and kill as many innocent as possible, then blame Hizbollah for hiding behind buildings in order to turn the people of Lebanon against Hizbollah. Basically a pr campaign that cost over a 1000 people their lives, a campagin that had the opposite affect.

2)Now that Hizbollah has depleted part of their arsenal, Washington is looking for the resuply lines-trying to find out where the weapons come from and who supplies them.

3)The Bush administration and its allies in Jerusalem see this as an essential step toward: 1) the removal of the Syrian Baathist regime, and 2) the launching of a full-scale war against Iran.

4)Assessments have been published in the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal, also numerous newspapers internationally. They simply state what is by now obvious: the Israeli attack on Lebanon was the realization of a long-planned act of aggression.

Purple Hawk

Commy wrote:

1)They intended to bomb the cities and kill as many innocent as possible, then blame Hizbollah for hiding behind buildings in order to turn the people of Lebanon against Hizbollah. Basically a pr campaign that cost over a 1000 people their lives, a campagin that had the opposite affect.

2)Now that Hizbollah has depleted part of their arsenal, Washington is looking for the resuply lines-trying to find out where the weapons come from and who supplies them.

3)The Bush administration and its allies in Jerusalem see this as an essential step toward: 1) the removal of the Syrian Baathist regime, and 2) the launching of a full-scale war against Iran.

4)Assessments have been published in the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal, also numerous newspapers internationally. They simply state what is by now obvious: the Israeli attack on Lebanon was the realization of a long-planned act of aggression.

Sorry, for some reason, I read every word of this post as it was written in crayon.

Commy

Chicken Hawk wrote:

Sorry, for some reason, I read every word of this post as it was written in crayon.

Way to adress the issue. Is that what you do, when you have nothing to offer? Straight ot the personal attacks?

Care to address points made? Or can you?

MrBrian

I think that's fairly accurate and I should say that it's almost comical to think that some people believe this whole thing was just about a few israeli soldiers getting killed or whatever.

Eliot Rosewater

MrBrian wrote:

I think that's fairly accurate and I should say that it's almost comical to think that some people believe this whole thing was just about a few israeli soldiers getting killed or whatever.

I agree. Further, I found it pretty silly that U.S. involvement and/or benefits from this debacle were minimized by anyone and everyone.

jsand

I hate this board. It really makes me want to stop listening to this band - to think I've been in the same room with people like this at concerts...

inmytree

jsand wrote:

I hate this board. It really makes me want to stop listening to this band - to think I've been in the same room with people like this at concerts...

later gator...

jsand

inmytree wrote:

later gator...

I'll still post here because, as I've said before, it's like a car accident. I can't help myself from looking at it even though it's repulsive.

monkey spanker

Commy wrote:

1)They intended to bomb the cities and kill as many innocent as possible, then blame Hizbollah for hiding behind buildings in order to turn the people of Lebanon against Hizbollah. Basically a pr campaign that cost over a 1000 people their lives, a campagin that had the opposite affect.

2)Now that Hizbollah has depleted part of their arsenal, Washington is looking for the resuply lines-trying to find out where the weapons come from and who supplies them.

3)The Bush administration and its allies in Jerusalem see this as an essential step toward: 1) the removal of the Syrian Baathist regime, and 2) the launching of a full-scale war against Iran.

4)Assessments have been published in the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal, also numerous newspapers internationally. They simply state what is by now obvious: the Israeli attack on Lebanon was the realization of a long-planned act of aggression.

that is quite posibly the most delusional post i have ever read.

jsand

monkey spanker wrote:

that is quite posibly the most delusional post i have ever read.

What's sad is that there have definitely been even worse posts on this site. Scary.

sliverstain

Commy wrote:

Way to adress the issue. Is that what you do, when you have nothing to offer? Straight ot the personal attacks?

Care to address points made? Or can you?

I don't think he has the ability. Kudos for trying though.

And yeah, great, although obvious to the rest of the civilised world, points made in the original post.

Purple Hawk

Commy wrote:

Way to adress the issue. Is that what you do, when you have nothing to offer? Straight ot the personal attacks?

Care to address points made? Or can you?

Once a point is made, it'll be addressed.

chopitdown

Commy wrote:

1)They intended to bomb the cities and kill as many innocent as possible, then blame Hizbollah for hiding behind buildings in order to turn the people of Lebanon against Hizbollah. Basically a pr campaign that cost over a 1000 people their lives, a campagin that had the opposite affect.

2)Now that Hizbollah has depleted part of their arsenal, Washington is looking for the resuply lines-trying to find out where the weapons come from and who supplies them.

3)The Bush administration and its allies in Jerusalem see this as an essential step toward: 1) the removal of the Syrian Baathist regime, and 2) the launching of a full-scale war against Iran.

4)Assessments have been published in the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal, also numerous newspapers internationally. They simply state what is by now obvious: the Israeli attack on Lebanon was the realization of a long-planned act of aggression.

1. or the militant wing of hezboallah really is a state within a state and needs to be dealt with. If Israel can never be in the right, as some here feel, then yes your idea is prob right in their eyes. Or hezbollah is just a pawn of syria and iran to destroy a sovereing country and iran wants the us to attack it.
2.they know who supplies them...iran and syria...they didn't need a war for that
3. Iran will only be attacked if they provoke it...i don't think there will be anymore pre-emptive strikes. congress would not give approval for that right now and international tensions are such that the US would be ostracized from just about every where.

4. israel got fed up with hizbollah, remember the entire region wants israel gone...i bet you'd snap if someone came to your land and kept berating you, then you withdrew from some of it and then it still happened, then had people saying you should be wiped off the map. I'm sure you'd finally get fed up with it and take matters into your hands since the international community wouldn't do anything.

sliverstain

jsand wrote:

I hate this board. It really makes me want to stop listening to this band - to think I've been in the same room with people like this at concerts...

Yeah man, all those songs and lyrics about peace and equality and protecting the exploited, yeah, they must REALLY get on your goat.

Does bushleaguer make you vomit?
Does WWS give you the shakes?
Does WMA make you tremble with racist borne rage? (Or maybe you see that as a song that promotes your kind, the WMA kind of person.)
Does DTE make you scream "No Eddie!! Your all wrong!! Bush is great !!"
Does Rival or Comatose make you scream blue murder about those goddamned awful homosexuals?
Does Even Flow make you shout at the stereo, "Homeless, WHAT FUCKING HOMELESS!! This is America!!"

Does the phrase "Drilling for fear makes the job simple," or "the haves have not a clue" make you cry and wonder how the author of such lovely love songs as Black or EWBTCIAST can stoop so low as to attack our own government and bash America??

Hey, goodbye, thanks for joining in, don't forget your coat.

jsand

sliverstain wrote:

Yeah man, all those songs and lyrics about peace and equality and protecting the exploited, yeah, they must REALLY get on your goat.

Does bushleaguer make you vomit?
Does WWS give you the shakes?
Does WMA make you tremble with racist borne rage? (Or maybe you see that as a song that promotes your kind, the WMA kind of person.)
Does DTE make you scream "No Eddie!! Your all wrong!! Bush is great !!"
Does Rival or Comatose make you scream blue murder about those goddamned awful homosexuals?
Does Even Flow make you shout at the stereo, "Homeless, WHAT FUCKING HOMELESS!! This is America!!"

Does the phrase "Drilling for fear makes the job simple," or "the haves have not a clue" make you cry and wonder how the author of such lovely love songs as Black or EWBTCIAST can stoop so low as to attack our own government and bash America??

Hey, goodbye, thanks for joining in, don't forget your coat.

You found me out, silverstein. I hate black people, and gays, and the homeless. Congrats.

Little baby.

chopitdown

sliverstain wrote:

Yeah man, all those songs and lyrics about peace and equality and protecting the exploited, yeah, they must REALLY get on your goat.

Does bushleaguer make you vomit?
Does WWS give you the shakes?
Does WMA make you tremble with racist borne rage? (Or maybe you see that as a song that promotes your kind, the WMA kind of person.)
Does DTE make you scream "No Eddie!! Your all wrong!! Bush is great !!"
Does Rival or Comatose make you scream blue murder about those goddamned awful homosexuals?
Does Even Flow make you shout at the stereo, "Homeless, WHAT FUCKING HOMELESS!! This is America!!"

Does the phrase "Drilling for fear makes the job simple," or "the haves have not a clue" make you cry and wonder how the author of such lovely love songs as Black or EWBTCIAST can stoop so low as to attack our own government and bash America??

Hey, goodbye, thanks for joining in, don't forget your coat.

does antagonizing people make you happy? It's an honest question.

jsand

chopitdown wrote:

does antagonizing people make you happy? It's an honest question.

I think I can answer on silverstein's behalf - he loves to antagonize. Look how many of the threads he's been involved in have been shut down.

sliverstain

chopitdown wrote:

does antagonizing people make you happy? It's an honest question.

I only antagonise racists, bigots, homophobes. I only antagonise those who wish to paint pictures of an entire group of people as inhuman, as below their expressed, racist opinion.

Ill hound, antagonise and piss off such people until I render their slanted, hateful world view for all to see, and all to despise.

Is that a bad thing? THat's an honest question.

sliverstain

jsand wrote:

I think I can answer on silverstein's behalf - he loves to antagonize. Look how many of the threads he's been involved in have been shut down.

Im stil waiting for that link to a post where I have been bigoted.

If you can't, then you have rendered everything you say as impotent, and not worth a damn.

Not that we needed such confirmation.

jsand

sliverstain wrote:

I only antagonise racists, bigots, homophobes. I only antagonise those who wish to paint pictures of an entire group of people as inhuman, as below their expressed, racist opinion.

Ill hound, antagonise and piss off such people until I render their slanted, hateful world view for all to see, and all to despise.

Is that a bad thing? THat's an honest question.

But the thing is most people on this board already recognize how immature and childish you are. You pull out the racist card more than Cynthia McKinney.

jsand

sliverstain wrote:

Im stil waiting for that link to a post where I have been bigoted.

If you can't, then you have rendered everything you say as impotent, and not worth a damn.

Not that we needed such confirmation.

This coming from the little baby that says I hate gays and blacks and homeless people. You're a joke.