Feingold says they can and should end funding for the war without putting the troops in danger. They have the money for a withdrawal. Bush can not keep a war going that has no funding. Bush can veto, the Dems can filibuster...they are not powerless to do anything about it except keep voting yes to keep fiund the war.
That is well and good if the president had any intention of removing the troops. Again, he was planning on continuing anyway. 200,000 civilian jobs/closing bases for the funds.
You going to change the subject to impeachment again? It seems to be a neverending circle of mischaracterizations.
That is well and good if the president had any intention of removing the troops. Again, he was planning on continuing anyway. 200,000 civilian jobs/closing bases for the funds.
You going to change the subject to impeachment again? It seems to be a neverending circle of mischaracterizations.
Why not? It's next logical step. The Dems haven't did anything to try to stop him...they'll just vote yes and be on their merry way. No attempts at filibuster or calls for impeachment.
The Reps called for impeachment over lying under oath and you're going to sit here and tell me that the Dems couldn't muster up enough on Bush to impeach after he leaves the troops stranded without funds not to mention all the other crap that people have already been calling for impeachment over? Riiight. Go ahead, post me the next excuse as why Dems don't have the power to do anything but sit on their hands. Our gov't has no means of checks and balances...it's all Bush's calls. And if the rest of the Reps in congress went along with leaving the troops out there without funds instead of getting on board with pushing for a withdrawal this fucking country should get off their ass and riot. And please tell me, who is preventing us from demanding more? Who is vetoing your voice?
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
Comments
That is well and good if the president had any intention of removing the troops. Again, he was planning on continuing anyway. 200,000 civilian jobs/closing bases for the funds.
You going to change the subject to impeachment again? It seems to be a neverending circle of mischaracterizations.
Good luck on your candidate.
Why not? It's next logical step. The Dems haven't did anything to try to stop him...they'll just vote yes and be on their merry way. No attempts at filibuster or calls for impeachment.
The Reps called for impeachment over lying under oath and you're going to sit here and tell me that the Dems couldn't muster up enough on Bush to impeach after he leaves the troops stranded without funds not to mention all the other crap that people have already been calling for impeachment over? Riiight. Go ahead, post me the next excuse as why Dems don't have the power to do anything but sit on their hands. Our gov't has no means of checks and balances...it's all Bush's calls. And if the rest of the Reps in congress went along with leaving the troops out there without funds instead of getting on board with pushing for a withdrawal this fucking country should get off their ass and riot. And please tell me, who is preventing us from demanding more? Who is vetoing your voice?
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde