Twiddle Dee or Twiddle Dum

13»

Comments

  • bryn_cmbs wrote:
    only an idiot woud think Obama and McCain are the same.

    Of course... McCain's "old skool", and Obama is all about change.

    Just weird how they both go about it in much the same way...
    Smokey Robinson constantly looks like he's trying to act natural after being accused of farting.
  • bryn_cmbs wrote:
    only an idiot woud think Obama and McCain are the same.


    Then there are a lot of very intelligent idiots out there that are lying.

    well...they look different...they talk different...they have different pastors.

    When it comes to the war on terror...no difference.... Well one guy has said he'll talk a little more first...like bow down please...but bow down or we will bomb you unles you obey us.

    Iran will be denied the right to have nuclear power and they will have to suck it up or perish, and the occupation forces will spread, and the situation will escalate.

    Hope you're good with a rifle.

    so there's your bottom line...no two ways about it.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,959
    gracias, mr. righteous canadian dude ;)


    even flow? is the only righteous canadian dude!

    Anyhow, it is a bit easy to say "I'm was right!" when you don't even pick a dog in the fight and you only say they both suck! ;)
    hippiemom = goodness
  • decides2dream
    decides2dream Posts: 14,977
    "Later I was introduced to Nader's closest adviser, his handsome, piercingly intelligent 30-year-old nephew, Tarek Milleron. Although Milleron argued that environmentalists and other activists would find fundraising easier under Bush, he acknowledged that a Bush presidency would be worse for poor and working-class people, for blacks, for most Americans. As Moore had, he claimed that Nader's campaign would encourage Web-based vote-swapping between progressives in safe and contested states. But when I suggested that Nader could gain substantial influence in a Democratic administration by focusing his campaign on the 40 safe states and encouraging his supporters elsewhere to vote Gore, Milleron leaned coolly toward me with extra steel in his voice and body. He did not disagree. He simply said, "We're not going to do that."

    "Why not?" I said.

    With just a flicker of smile, he answered, "Because we want to punish the Democrats, we want to hurt them, wound them."

    There was a long silence and the conversation was over.

    Milleron's words are so remarkable they bear repeating: Ralph Nader ran so he could hurt, wound, and punish the Democrats. His primary goal was not raising issues, much less building the Green Party. He actively wanted Gore to lose. Where did this passion to punish come from? "

    http://www.hereinstead.com/Village-Voice--Ralph-Nader--Levine.htm


    didn't post this earlier but wanted to point out this passed over post...the entire article was a very interesting read. sure, it's the past.....but it still was interesting and i had not seen it when originally published.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • even flow? is the only righteous canadian dude!

    Anyhow, it is a bit easy to say "I'm was right!" when you don't even pick a dog in the fight and you only say they both suck! ;)


    Almost as bad as not realizing that's it's not even an official dog fight in the first place...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")