To A Moving Train: TAKE HEED!

24

Comments

  • Juberoo
    Juberoo Posts: 472
    brokendave wrote:
    We are all guilty of this from time to time... This time, we will all be reminded by a 17 year old:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYrIecDo-So

    (YouTube Video)

    and if you look at the other videos this moron made, you will understand why people make comments to him about these things. His is only 17, inexperienced and opinionated about life issues that he cannot fully comprehend at his age. His blathering vid blogs filled with ego, entitlement, arrogance and attitude prove how wisdom comes with age. Youth like him are what is destroying society. I pity his parents and I pity mankind for what a future with minds like these holds.
    Makes much more sense, to live in the present tense.

    A truly liberal person is conservative when necessary.

    Pro-life by choice.
  • godpt3
    godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Popular Mechanics?!?!...ahahha

    No really...that was a good joke.

    lol...

    Sometimes you really do manage to pull out some good ones...


    Well, considering they probably know a whole fuck lot more about engineering and physics than the common schlep that posts this retarded conspiracy shit...

    I bet you didn't even bother to read it, did you??? Of course not, because the Black Knight always triumphs.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    Juberoo wrote:
    and if you look at the other videos this moron made, you will understand why people make comments to him about these things. His is only 17, inexperienced and opinionated about life issues that he cannot fully comprehend at his age. His blathering vid blogs filled with ego, entitlement, arrogance and attitude prove how wisdom comes with age. Youth like him are what is destroying society. I pity his parents and I pity mankind for what a future with minds like these holds.
    Yeah, and did you get his point? ...that an absolutely accurate subject matter stands, 100%, irrelevent to all these personal issues and judgments you project on him.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Popular Mechanics?!?!...ahahha

    No really...that was a good joke.

    lol...

    Sometimes you really do manage to pull out some good ones...

    so what is wrong with that site?
  • Flannel Shirt
    Flannel Shirt Posts: 1,021
    Juberoo wrote:
    and if you look at the other videos this moron made, you will understand why people make comments to him about these things. His is only 17, inexperienced and opinionated about life issues that he cannot fully comprehend at his age. His blathering vid blogs filled with ego, entitlement, arrogance and attitude prove how wisdom comes with age. Youth like him are what is destroying society. I pity his parents and I pity mankind for what a future with minds like these holds.

    I did watch a few of them, and I want my 5 minutes back. Anyway, I completely agree with his video where he proves God is real. I think he was very mature and his presentation was full of intelligent points.
    All that's sacred, comes from youth....dedications, naive and true.
  • spiral out
    spiral out Posts: 1,052
    jlew24asu wrote:
    so what is wrong with that site?

    It's just a website it's not credible.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    spiral out wrote:
    It's just a website it's not credible.

    why isnt it credible?

    but anything and everything that alex jones says is?
  • godpt3
    godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    spiral out wrote:
    It's just a website it's not credible.

    c'mon. is that the best you can come up with???

    You do realize that Popular Mechanics is a well-respected publication that has been printed for 70 years or so???

    Try again.
    Try harder.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • spiral out
    spiral out Posts: 1,052
    godpt3 wrote:
    c'mon. is that the best you can come up with???

    You do realize that Popular Mechanics is a well-respected publication that has been printed for 70 years or so???

    Try again.
    Try harder.

    Why when have you ever come up with an argument, from what i see all you do is make fun of people.

    To be honest i'm just throwing back at you the usual rubbish you both post when a link to a website that you don't agree with is posted.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • spiral out
    spiral out Posts: 1,052
    jlew24asu wrote:
    why isnt it credible?

    but anything and everything that alex jones says is?

    Surely by now you would know better than to throw insults at me concerning alex jones or whatreallyhappened.com

    They don't hold as i am able to read books for my information thanks.

    Infact i don't really see anyone here qoute alex jones or whatreallyhappened.com, maybe it's time to find a new site to throw up as rubbish.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • Flannel Shirt
    Flannel Shirt Posts: 1,021
    Maybe I missed it, but I did go to Pop Mechanics and could not find any explaination regarding the speed the buildings fell?

    If bullshit was electricity, pop mechanics would be a powerhouse.
    All that's sacred, comes from youth....dedications, naive and true.
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    spiral out wrote:
    Why when have you ever come up with an argument, from what i see all you do is make fun of people.

    To be honest i'm just throwing back at you the usual rubbish you both post when a link to a website that you don't agree with is posted.
    I agree totally: godpt3 is generally void of arguments, and therefore it comes off as laughable when he is mocking what someone else comes up with.

    Also, the popular mechanics article was "debunked" a longgg time ago on the moving train.

    Just because something is written in a mainstream publication does not make it objectively accurate.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • godpt3
    godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    Flannel Shirt wrote:
    Maybe I missed it, but I did go to Pop Mechanics and could not find any explaination regarding the speed the buildings fell?

    nothing falls faster than 9.8 m/s squared. Unless you think Isaac Newton was in on the conspiracy, too.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • godpt3
    godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    angelica wrote:

    Also, the popular mechanics article was "debunked" a longgg time ago on the moving train.


    interesting... link please.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • godpt3
    godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    angelica wrote:

    Just because something is written in a mainstream publication does not make it objectively accurate.

    true, but we're ususally held to a higher standard than the random crap floating through cyberspace.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    godpt3 wrote:
    interesting... link please.
    You're very welcome to search yourself if you are interested.
    true, but we're ususally held to a higher standard than the random crap floating through cyberspace.
    The term "higher standard" is entirely relative, depending on one's point of view. It is the developmental level of the person doing the writing that indicates their level of being able to perceive and understand situations accurately objectively speaking. "Fact checking" is far removed from whether or not someone has effectively faced and dealt with their personal inner biases and filters that cause distortion and misunderstanding of facts. Historical events are always understood with increasing accuracy over time, because the mainstream mindset that original interpretations, including "official ones", are biased because they stem from the social/emotional/mental climate of the time.

    The truth comes from being able to see what's happened from outside the box--from an objective place. The general mindset at this time does not do that, and a publication like popular mechanics is not looking to step beyond that general mindset at this time, rather they work to appeal to it.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Godpt3 = definitely not up to speed on the latest information.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Flannel Shirt
    Flannel Shirt Posts: 1,021
    godpt3 wrote:
    nothing falls faster than 9.8 m/s squared. Unless you think Isaac Newton was in on the conspiracy, too.

    Hey man, maybe he was. He was a member of the skulls and a mason and a satan worshipper.

    Um, not sure where you are going with that answer? Only saying the buildings free fell, controlled demo style. I am far from an engineer or sceintist or physicist. That said, my common sense tells me the buildings should not have collapsed free fall style like they were made of sand. Maybe I am wrong and buildings do fall down on themselves like that, but it doesnt seem right. And, firemen said they heard bombs going off inside the building before the collapse.

    Its just fishy and worth looking into.

    Maybe there was a downdraft of the gulfstream that day and the buildings were pushed down faster....kinda like the parts of people and other things were blow into the lake in PA due to the winds.
    All that's sacred, comes from youth....dedications, naive and true.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    spiral out wrote:
    Surely by now you would know better than to throw insults at me concerning alex jones or whatreallyhappened.com

    They don't hold as i am able to read books for my information thanks.

    Infact i don't really see anyone here qoute alex jones or whatreallyhappened.com, maybe it's time to find a new site to throw up as rubbish.

    again, how is popular mechanics not creditable ?

    and you must be kidding. almost every website driftin and roland post are from alex jones. they just sneak it by you, cuz they re-name the links.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    angelica wrote:

    Also, the popular mechanics article was "debunked" a longgg time ago on the moving train.

    it was only "debunked" cuz somehow, somewhere, Bush has a relative who worked at the magazine.

    not exactly proof of debunking

Categories