morality exemptions

catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
edited April 2007 in A Moving Train
do you believe there are some people who should be exempt from the morality of society in general?
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    What do you mean?

    If you are referring to people who have suffered serious brain injury or trauma, then no. Politicians, no. I don't think anyone should be exempt from morality. Although I don't agree with everyone's versions of morality.

    People who are sick should be examined and appropriate therapy given to help repair the damage.

    Just my opinion, don't fucking flip out.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    i won't flip out. :D
    it was just a question our teacher asked us in class during the week. we're reading dostoyevsky's crime and punishment and its relevant to that(or so our professor tells us). she asked us should people of higher intelligence be above the normal moral standard. it took me about a second to say absolutely not, everyone should be held accountable in the same way.
    but as you have pointed out ahnimus, people with brain injuries would constitute a different class of accountability. allowances should be made. but that doesn't mean they should be able to get away with murder figuratively speaking.
    and yes again i agree, morality is not a universal thing. nor should it be. or be expected to be.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • edgarcampedgarcamp Posts: 100
    People of higher intellijense! I know so many, and their morals suck. If they are so god damn smart, then they should be held to a higher standard. In the end, we are all just people.
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    absolutely not.


    however, i think 'moral standards' are quite amibiguous to begin with. sure, there are some very specific/clear societal moral standards, more along lines of right/wrong...but even then, we all seem to have exceptions to said standards too...so yea, it's difficult to pinpoint. bottomline though, i think no one should be exempt from our basic morals as a society. on a personal level, far more amibiguous and thus more leeway.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • Ask the current US government.... :rolleyes:
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    do you believe there are some people who should be exempt from the morality of society in general?

    I was under the impression Jesus killed you in Mississippi recently.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • JeanieJeanie Posts: 9,446
    do you believe there are some people who should be exempt from the morality of society in general?

    No, but it's all subjective isn't it? :)
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    i won't flip out. :D
    it was just a question our teacher asked us in class during the week. we're reading dostoyevsky's crime and punishment and its relevant to that(or so our professor tells us). she asked us should people of higher intelligence be above the normal moral standard. it took me about a second to say absolutely not, everyone should be held accountable in the same way.
    but as you have pointed out ahnimus, people with brain injuries would constitute a different class of accountability. allowances should be made. but that doesn't mean they should be able to get away with murder figuratively speaking.
    and yes again i agree, morality is not a universal thing. nor should it be. or be expected to be.

    An over-rated novel. The detail of the murder lead many to suspect Dostoevsky actually did the deed.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    gue_barium wrote:
    An over-rated novel. The detail of the murder lead many to suspect Dostoevsky actually did the deed.



    i loved it. :)
    so yea, don't consider it over-rated in the least...but an excellent thought process there. and yea, as jeanie pointed out quite succinctly, morality IS quite subjective, so yea......:p
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    i loved it. :)
    so yea, don't consider it over-rated in the least...but an excellent thought process there. and yea, as jeanie pointed out quite succinctly, morality IS quite subjective, so yea......:p

    killing in the name of love, he goes.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • gue_barium wrote:
    An over-rated novel. quote]

    Eh? Why?
    "Should I tell you my room is walled up? In what way might I leave it? Here is how; Goodwill knows no obstacle. Nothing can stand before a deep desire. All I have to do is imagine a door." -Schultz

    Trading stories with the leaves instead
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    crime and punishment is one of the greatest novels ever written. there are times i think morality is relative. perhaps vigilantism like boondock saints...
  • negationistnegationist Posts: 237
    morals?! Aren't they just rules made by humans to ensure that humans behave in a certain way. Something that is immoral to one may not be the same to another.
    If Pearl Jam was a beer, they'd probably be the best beer in the world!!
Sign In or Register to comment.