Home› A Moving Train

So the country's antiwar and Hillary wins NH!?

musicismylife78musicismylife78 Posts: 6,116
edited January 2008 in A Moving Train
Can anyone explain this contradiction?

Since November 2004 the country has been solidly and unwavering in their support for pulling the troops out of iraq and ending the war.

So what explains NH voting for Clinton?
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,672
    Wait, are you telling me that you didnt see her crying? that shit was touching. she got my vote after that.
    ---

    Thats the american voter for you, I bet some obama supporters even switched to the hillary camp after that soap opera she put on. American voters are easily fooled.
  • MasterFramerMasterFramer Posts: 2,268
    radiohead33 wrote:

    So what explains NH voting for Clinton?

    Old White Women... hardly the whole country man.
    10.31.93 / 10.1.94 / 6.24.95 / 11.4.95 / 10.19-20.96 / 7.16.98 / 7.21.98 / 10.31.00 /8.4.01 Nader Rally/ 10.21.01 / 12.8-9.02 / 6.01.03 / 9.1.05 / 7.15-16,18.06 / 7.20.06 / 7.22-23.06 / Lolla 07
  • DPrival78DPrival78 CT Posts: 2,263
    radiohead33 wrote:
    So what explains NH voting for Clinton?

    an uninformed electorate.. vote fraud.. biased media coverage..

    just a few things.
    i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    What explains ANY person voting for Hillary?

    That's my question.
  • MasterFramerMasterFramer Posts: 2,268
    _FiveAgainstOne_ wrote:
    What explains ANY person voting for Hillary?

    That's my question.

    Something I agree with you on...
    10.31.93 / 10.1.94 / 6.24.95 / 11.4.95 / 10.19-20.96 / 7.16.98 / 7.21.98 / 10.31.00 /8.4.01 Nader Rally/ 10.21.01 / 12.8-9.02 / 6.01.03 / 9.1.05 / 7.15-16,18.06 / 7.20.06 / 7.22-23.06 / Lolla 07
  • RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Reason?

    Diebold.

    Their machines are ridiculously susceptible to fraud. This isn't a coincidence imo.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Bu2Bu2 Posts: 1,693
    In case y'all didn't know this already, Dennis Kucinich and a Republican have demanded and paid the $2,000 fees each for, a hand count of the NH votes.

    New Hampshire agreed, this past Friday, to do the recount.
    Feels Good Inc.
  • smokemsmokem Posts: 13
    You dont understand the country if you think being anti-war correlates to a win for the most ultra liberal politicians. In times of crisis, this country, which includes places like the South and the Mid West, tend to vote for experience over rhetoric. That's why you see names like Clinton and McCain at the top of the heap right now. And just remember New Hampshire is just one small state. All this crap will be settled on Super Tuesday. Thank god states like New York and California will be able to chime in before this shit is settled by the South and the Midwest.
  • smokemsmokem Posts: 13
    there's the whole issue of electability in a general election. look at what the Clinton Machine is doing to Obama right now. If he cant survive that, he sure as hell aint going to survive the Republican mean machine.
  • MasterFramerMasterFramer Posts: 2,268
    smokem wrote:
    there's the whole issue of electability in a general election. look at what the Clinton Machine is doing to Obama right now. If he cant survive that, he sure as hell aint going to survive the Republican mean machine.

    He's within 5 points now nationally... and you are smoking crack if you think a Republican is going to be "elected".
    10.31.93 / 10.1.94 / 6.24.95 / 11.4.95 / 10.19-20.96 / 7.16.98 / 7.21.98 / 10.31.00 /8.4.01 Nader Rally/ 10.21.01 / 12.8-9.02 / 6.01.03 / 9.1.05 / 7.15-16,18.06 / 7.20.06 / 7.22-23.06 / Lolla 07
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    MasterFramer wrote:
    He's within 5 points now nationally... and you are smoking crack if you think a Republican is going to be "elected".

    if hilary is the nominee I guarantee a republican will win.
  • MasterFramerMasterFramer Posts: 2,268
    jlew24asu wrote:
    if hilary is the nominee I guarantee a republican will win.

    Again... if Hilary is the nominee she wont be "elected" Why do so many people have faith in the results of these elections?
    10.31.93 / 10.1.94 / 6.24.95 / 11.4.95 / 10.19-20.96 / 7.16.98 / 7.21.98 / 10.31.00 /8.4.01 Nader Rally/ 10.21.01 / 12.8-9.02 / 6.01.03 / 9.1.05 / 7.15-16,18.06 / 7.20.06 / 7.22-23.06 / Lolla 07
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    MasterFramer wrote:
    Again... if Hilary is the nominee she wont be "elected" Why do so many people have faith in the results of these elections?

    :confused:
  • smokemsmokem Posts: 13
    jlew24asu wrote:
    if hilary is the nominee I guarantee a republican will win.


    The South is not going to elect a black or a woman. Lets be real. If Hillary or Obama win the same states will be as red now as they were in 04 and 00. While I dont like him personally Edwards is the most electable democrat simply on demographics and because he is so darn cracker. Either way the democrats are sure to nominate the most unelectable of the lot so don't count out anyone.
  • smokemsmokem Posts: 13
    MasterFramer wrote:
    He's within 5 points now nationally... and you are smoking crack if you think a Republican is going to be "elected".
    Ah.....the points say it is so do they? And the points never lie...cough...New Hampshire.
  • MasterFramerMasterFramer Posts: 2,268
    smokem wrote:
    Ah.....the points say it is so do they? And the points never lie...cough...New Hampshire.

    Your problem begins with the fact you trust the results...

    http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=269437
    10.31.93 / 10.1.94 / 6.24.95 / 11.4.95 / 10.19-20.96 / 7.16.98 / 7.21.98 / 10.31.00 /8.4.01 Nader Rally/ 10.21.01 / 12.8-9.02 / 6.01.03 / 9.1.05 / 7.15-16,18.06 / 7.20.06 / 7.22-23.06 / Lolla 07
  • smokemsmokem Posts: 13
    MasterFramer wrote:
    Your problem begins with the fact you trust the results...

    http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=269437
    Machines, points, whatever. Its all broken
  • AraineaArainea Posts: 58
    Part of the problem is that people tend to be entirely uninformed on candidates' actually voting records. There are plenty of people who do not realize that Hillary Clinton voted in favor of the original Iraq invasion.
  • melodiousmelodious Posts: 1,719
    thus, getting back to my point as to why i should vote anyway? who really investigates candidate records? you can look at your local level and see what your local supervisors are in favor; as well as the state and federal level.....i mean by voting it says i support the lies..if i don't vote, i am considered apathetic...

    as for hillary, she doesn't have enough heart to really go out and support invasions....she is mother, after all....how could a mother send an entire generation off to slaughter...

    beats the hell out of me...

    as for the post stating something about the south, i concur...there's too many narrow minded souls in this entire nation...
    all insanity:
    a derivitive of nature.
    nature is god
    god is love
    love is light
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    It's all rigged.
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    radiohead33 wrote:
    Can anyone explain this contradiction?

    Since November 2004 the country has been solidly and unwavering in their support for pulling the troops out of iraq and ending the war.

    So what explains NH voting for Clinton?


    what have any of the major corporate candidates done to end the war???
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
Sign In or Register to comment.