Court proceedings

musicismylife78musicismylife78 Posts: 6,116
edited April 2007 in A Moving Train
During trials, why does the jury come back from deliberation, the judge ask if they have reached a verdict, and they indicate they have, then the judge asks to see the verdict, and the baliff passes the verdict to the judge. All this before the verdict is revealed to the prosecution and defense.

Why must the judge see the verdict before?
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • LikeAnOceanLikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    um maybe to inform the courtroom because the jury can't speak? Someones got to inform everyone, so why not the judge.
  • but its usually not the judge who reads the verdict. Remember the OJ trial. We all saw that clip thousands of times. That wasnt judge ito reading the verdict it was the forewoman of the jury.

    Watch some court proceedings. The judge rarely reads the final verdict. Its usually as I said, the jury foreperson.

    Maybe your right, I havent ever heard of a jury member speaking during proceedings, but I have heard many times, juries speaking and giving the announcement of the defenders fate
  • plus isnt the statement "we the jury find so and so..." a cultural touchstone.

    You hear many people say "the jury says" or "the jury's out on that one" in common table talk or in common conversation. This wouldnt be the case if the jury never spoke at all.
  • tobbactobbac Posts: 234
    i'd have to say that its because the judge is in charge of the proceedings....everything that happens in the courtroom has to go through him....
    You ain't-never seen no one like me
    Prevail-regardless what the cost might be
    Power-flows inside of me, you can't bring me
    Never-fall as long as I try
    Refuse-to be a part of your lie
    Even-if it means I die, you can't bring me
    You...can't...bring...me...down!
  • sicnevolsicnevol Posts: 180
    During trials, why does the jury come back from deliberation, the judge ask if they have reached a verdict, and they indicate they have, then the judge asks to see the verdict, and the baliff passes the verdict to the judge. All this before the verdict is revealed to the prosecution and defense.

    Why must the judge see the verdict before?
    in osme cases, he is allowed to veto power over the jury, so if he doesn't agrew with it he can throw it out and deliver his own.
    That's two things we've got, Tape and Time.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    During trials, why does the jury come back from deliberation, the judge ask if they have reached a verdict, and they indicate they have, then the judge asks to see the verdict, and the baliff passes the verdict to the judge. All this before the verdict is revealed to the prosecution and defense.

    Why must the judge see the verdict before?

    so he's not surprised.
  • moeaholicmoeaholic Posts: 535
    sicnevol wrote:
    in osme cases, he is allowed to veto power over the jury, so if he doesn't agrew with it he can throw it out and deliver his own.

    what a kick in the balls that would be. here, sit in this box for as long as we want you to, we're sequestering you, so you'll be staying in a hotel away from your family, we'll pay you, but nowhere near what you make at your job, and when i read the verdict, i'll say your work was for nothing and overturn it.
    "PC Load Letter?! What the fuck does that mean?"
    ~Michael Bolton
  • blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    i'd have to say that its because the judge is in charge of the proceedings....everything that happens in the courtroom has to go through him....

    exactly... what if the jury decided something extraordinary that didn't legally belong in the case/verdict?
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
Sign In or Register to comment.