Republicans vote based on guns, religion, and/or money.
You are telling me that's an inaccurate and dangerous generalization?
Ron Paul is a republican, and he doesn't vote on those things. I don't believe in generalizations of any kind, nor do I believe in labels like democrat or republican. We're all human beings, and therefore we all deserve love. It really is that simple.
"In this cause I too am prepared to die. There is no cause for which I am prepared to kill" -Gandhi
Ron Paul is a republican, and he doesn't vote on those things. I don't believe in generalizations of any kind, nor do I believe in labels like democrat or republican. We're all human beings, and therefore we all deserve love. It really is that simple.
That is so adorable!
:rolleyes:
Unfortunately, "labels" such as DemocratIC and Republican actually EXIST, independent of whether you believe in them or not.
And unless I'm mistaken, Ron Paul considers himself more a Libertarian than a Republican. Either way, you have to admit that he did/does not represent most Republicans' viewpoints. He certainly didn't follow the party line. Isn't that why so many hippiedippies loved him?
"Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States, Barack Obama."
"Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore
"i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
~ed, 8/7
Without the ability to generalize, our minds literally would not be able to function. They would become overwhelmed and confused by the infinite number of individual details.
Anyhow..
Gotta love how Bush goes, "...and housing prices would fall dramatically."
Well, that's what's supposed to happen in a market correction. Middle class homes are not supposed to cost a half million dollars. It's just that simple.
And then he goes on to say that the troubled assets that are being purchased by the government will eventually regain their value and taxpayers will earn their money back.
What he's saying is that the government is actually hoping that middle class homes will again one day cost an arm and a leg to own -putting families into debt for upwards of 40 years.
And throughout that whole speech, he failed to mention even once that artificially low interest rates set by Greenspan and the Fed are the main reason why all this is happening. Countless prominent economists and Ron Paul himself have acknowledged this to be the case.
Just goes to show that he still has not realized the severity of the situation, and so it's no wonder he thinks it can all be fixed by a simple bailout plan.
There is a time and place for generalizations. Depends on what the nature of the discussion is ...
anyway ...
Who knows what Bush really thinks or doesn't or realizes, that is the truth of the matter. He was definitely skirting issues that is for sure and presenting an overall "generalized" plan, which "seems" to be a cover someone's arse plan. : )
Comments
"Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore
"i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
~ed, 8/7
Ron Paul is a republican, and he doesn't vote on those things. I don't believe in generalizations of any kind, nor do I believe in labels like democrat or republican. We're all human beings, and therefore we all deserve love. It really is that simple.
Iraq Veterans Against the War
www.ivaw.org
That is so adorable!
:rolleyes:
Unfortunately, "labels" such as DemocratIC and Republican actually EXIST, independent of whether you believe in them or not.
And unless I'm mistaken, Ron Paul considers himself more a Libertarian than a Republican. Either way, you have to admit that he did/does not represent most Republicans' viewpoints. He certainly didn't follow the party line. Isn't that why so many hippiedippies loved him?
"Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore
"i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
~ed, 8/7
There is a time and place for generalizations. Depends on what the nature of the discussion is ...
anyway ...
Who knows what Bush really thinks or doesn't or realizes, that is the truth of the matter. He was definitely skirting issues that is for sure and presenting an overall "generalized" plan, which "seems" to be a cover someone's arse plan. : )