Zbigniew Brzezinski's Warped and Hypocritical Time Mag Article on Russia & Georgia
DriftingByTheStorm
Posts: 8,684
is here.
How can anyone take this ass seriously?
So i guess the US gets off on these charges, because we don't stop at our neighbors, but rather attack countries far away from us. Sure. Sure the United States (or the shitballs that control its foreign policy, rather) doesn't "dictate to their neighbors how to run their affairs." ...
this hypocrisy is fucking laughable.
A massive sneak attack perpetrated primarily upon civilians and civilian targets is reduced to "rash action" that is "perhaps unwise" on Georgia's part. And yet Russia is painted as some radical power-monger "waiting for such an act to provide a pretext for the use of force".
Again, does no one here see massive hypocrisy in such statements?
What is the US doing right now with Iran, and more recently even here with Russia? What was all this missile defense bullshit? This was the US waiting for a pretext to justify their bullshit policies. What if Iran gets pissed off at a blockade and shoots at a ship? Think we will be accused by the east of "waiting for such an act to provide a pretext for the use of force"?
Think the US media will cover that?
Think Zbig will get the hypocrisy involved?
This is sheer lunacy.
How does a country responding to an incident of mass terror (a sneak attack on civilians) get accused of looking for an excuse to escalate violence???
The only people looking for excuses here are the already dominant western powers. The United States and Israel, along with help from Britain, are abusing this fabricated incident with their client state -- Georgia -- in order to fashion a new boogie man to direct American public awareness upon. And of course, it does wonders for the defense industry as well, along with the long sought desire to bring missile defense systems to the region.
Fuck you Zbignew.
And you Obama lovers better wake up that THIS is the sort of biased manipulative policy behind his proposed presidency.
How can anyone take this ass seriously?
ZBig wrote:The end of the Cold War was supposed to usher in a new age in which the major powers would no longer dictate to their neighbors how to run their affairs.
So i guess the US gets off on these charges, because we don't stop at our neighbors, but rather attack countries far away from us. Sure. Sure the United States (or the shitballs that control its foreign policy, rather) doesn't "dictate to their neighbors how to run their affairs." ...
this hypocrisy is fucking laughable.
Zbig wrote:In recent weeks, a series of incidents along the fragile cease-fire lines that cut across Georgian territory helped prompt the escalation of violence, including Georgia's abortive effort to remove the "government" of South Ossetia, a small region with a population of about 70,000 people. That rash action was perhaps unwise, but it is evident from Russia's military response that Moscow was waiting for such an act to provide a pretext for the use of force.
A massive sneak attack perpetrated primarily upon civilians and civilian targets is reduced to "rash action" that is "perhaps unwise" on Georgia's part. And yet Russia is painted as some radical power-monger "waiting for such an act to provide a pretext for the use of force".
Again, does no one here see massive hypocrisy in such statements?
What is the US doing right now with Iran, and more recently even here with Russia? What was all this missile defense bullshit? This was the US waiting for a pretext to justify their bullshit policies. What if Iran gets pissed off at a blockade and shoots at a ship? Think we will be accused by the east of "waiting for such an act to provide a pretext for the use of force"?
Think the US media will cover that?
Think Zbig will get the hypocrisy involved?
This is sheer lunacy.
How does a country responding to an incident of mass terror (a sneak attack on civilians) get accused of looking for an excuse to escalate violence???
The only people looking for excuses here are the already dominant western powers. The United States and Israel, along with help from Britain, are abusing this fabricated incident with their client state -- Georgia -- in order to fashion a new boogie man to direct American public awareness upon. And of course, it does wonders for the defense industry as well, along with the long sought desire to bring missile defense systems to the region.
Fuck you Zbignew.
And you Obama lovers better wake up that THIS is the sort of biased manipulative policy behind his proposed presidency.
If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?
If I opened it now would you not understand?
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-- full on escalation.
Thank you, global ruling elite. Your genius, and good intentions have escalated conflict with a shrinking Russian empire that was once slowly and quietly bridging sympathies to Western policy and ideology.
This current fabrication of a crisis brought on solely by Western imperialist powers has forced Russia back in to a highly defensive position in which it is now being forced to project force in to other regions in order to countervail the threat presented at its own borders.
Way to go, NWO.
Who would have thought the way to solve the problems of the middle east was simply to exacerbate the global geopolitical climate of mistrust towards the west by threatening Russia over its own affairs.
Russia was responding to a SNEAK ATTACK.
What part of that is unclear?
And why are so many here in defense of the US\Globalist\Georgian position on this matter?
If I opened it now would you not understand?
really?
wow.
can you further expound upon your position regarding how exactly Russia is in the wrong to defend its troops, citizens, and supporters in a region that was sneak attacked by MASSIVE missle bombardments and heavy artilery?
Clearly articulate that position please.
Simply saying, "the situation is very complicated" is NOT sufficient.
I want to know specificaly what justifies Georgia (and therefore US response) in this situation, and why Russia should be seen as an agressor and a threat to the west based on its response to affairs regarding its own soverign defense?
If I opened it now would you not understand?
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
... it was written by Zbig himself.
I found this quote in the book Full Disclosure by Gary Glum (about the man made -- government -- origins of AIDS)
wow.
what a nice guy.
a real piece of shit, right?
Does his description of how society will be changed (and this was from the early 1970s) sound like a eutopia to you or some sick 1984 fucking nightmare?
Is this the kind of guy you Obama supporters want writing policy for the whitehouse?
Seriously.
If I opened it now would you not understand?
I haven't read it either.
Its now on my short list.
I have to get through "Old Boys" first -- an out of print book about the origins of the CIA and of the Bilderberg group. Crazy shit.
I did find this quazi-summary of The Technotronic Era ...
... if it is correct -- if this book was actually commissioned by the Club of Rome -- then the question is irrelevant.
It doesn't matter if he is arguing for it or simply predicting it, because the very fact that he was commissioned to write it by the elite themselves is proof positive that the intentions of the book were simply to lay out the possibilities for the future, and to give "them" a better understanding of what they could be capable of achieving in the future.
However, i will say, knowing what is known about Brzezinski, it shouldn't be too hard to deduce that he genuinely believes it is the providence of those of his ilk to rule over us lesser men. His place in the order has always been to advise his own masters of their options. He is "the left" version of Kissinger.
Without further delay:
-source
If I opened it now would you not understand?