Zbigniew Brzezinski's Warped and Hypocritical Time Mag Article on Russia & Georgia

DriftingByTheStormDriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
edited August 2008 in A Moving Train
is here.

How can anyone take this ass seriously?
ZBig wrote:
The end of the Cold War was supposed to usher in a new age in which the major powers would no longer dictate to their neighbors how to run their affairs.

So i guess the US gets off on these charges, because we don't stop at our neighbors, but rather attack countries far away from us. Sure. Sure the United States (or the shitballs that control its foreign policy, rather) doesn't "dictate to their neighbors how to run their affairs." ...

this hypocrisy is fucking laughable.
Zbig wrote:
In recent weeks, a series of incidents along the fragile cease-fire lines that cut across Georgian territory helped prompt the escalation of violence, including Georgia's abortive effort to remove the "government" of South Ossetia, a small region with a population of about 70,000 people. That rash action was perhaps unwise, but it is evident from Russia's military response that Moscow was waiting for such an act to provide a pretext for the use of force.

A massive sneak attack perpetrated primarily upon civilians and civilian targets is reduced to "rash action" that is "perhaps unwise" on Georgia's part. And yet Russia is painted as some radical power-monger "waiting for such an act to provide a pretext for the use of force".

Again, does no one here see massive hypocrisy in such statements?
What is the US doing right now with Iran, and more recently even here with Russia? What was all this missile defense bullshit? This was the US waiting for a pretext to justify their bullshit policies. What if Iran gets pissed off at a blockade and shoots at a ship? Think we will be accused by the east of "waiting for such an act to provide a pretext for the use of force"?

Think the US media will cover that?
Think Zbig will get the hypocrisy involved?

This is sheer lunacy.

How does a country responding to an incident of mass terror (a sneak attack on civilians) get accused of looking for an excuse to escalate violence???

The only people looking for excuses here are the already dominant western powers. The United States and Israel, along with help from Britain, are abusing this fabricated incident with their client state -- Georgia -- in order to fashion a new boogie man to direct American public awareness upon. And of course, it does wonders for the defense industry as well, along with the long sought desire to bring missile defense systems to the region.

Fuck you Zbignew.
And you Obama lovers better wake up that THIS is the sort of biased manipulative policy behind his proposed presidency.
If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • This is what all this warmongering by the West is getting us
    article wrote:
    Russia has dispatched the aircraft carrier at Admiral Kuznetsov to the Syrian port of Tartus. Admiral Kuznetsov, along with Russia’s biggest missile cruiser Moskva and at least four nuclear submarines, left Murmansk on the Barents Sea on August 18, according to DEBKAfile.

    Russia plans to install Iskandar missiles in Syria and its Baltic enclave of Kaliningrad.

    On August 21, at the Black Sea port of Sochi, Syrian president Bashar Assad told the media he is considering a Russian request to deploy missiles in his country.

    -- full on escalation.

    Thank you, global ruling elite. Your genius, and good intentions have escalated conflict with a shrinking Russian empire that was once slowly and quietly bridging sympathies to Western policy and ideology.

    This current fabrication of a crisis brought on solely by Western imperialist powers has forced Russia back in to a highly defensive position in which it is now being forced to project force in to other regions in order to countervail the threat presented at its own borders.

    Way to go, NWO.
    Who would have thought the way to solve the problems of the middle east was simply to exacerbate the global geopolitical climate of mistrust towards the west by threatening Russia over its own affairs.

    Russia was responding to a SNEAK ATTACK.
    What part of that is unclear?
    And why are so many here in defense of the US\Globalist\Georgian position on this matter?
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • spyguyspyguy Posts: 613
    article was dead on. thanks for posting
  • spyguy wrote:
    article was dead on. thanks for posting

    really?
    wow.

    can you further expound upon your position regarding how exactly Russia is in the wrong to defend its troops, citizens, and supporters in a region that was sneak attacked by MASSIVE missle bombardments and heavy artilery?

    Clearly articulate that position please.

    Simply saying, "the situation is very complicated" is NOT sufficient.

    I want to know specificaly what justifies Georgia (and therefore US response) in this situation, and why Russia should be seen as an agressor and a threat to the west based on its response to affairs regarding its own soverign defense?
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • spiral outspiral out Posts: 1,052
    I look forward to your reply to spyguy.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • This is only tangentaly related to the OP ...

    ... it was written by Zbig himself.
    I found this quote in the book Full Disclosure by Gary Glum (about the man made -- government -- origins of AIDS)
    Zbig wrote:
    Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote in The Technotronic Era in 1972, "At the same time the capacity to assert social and political control over the individual will vastly increase. It will soon be possible to assert almost continuous control over every citizen, and to maintain individual files containing even the most personal behavior of every citizen, in addition to the customary data.

    "These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. Power will gravitate into the hands of those who control information.This will encourage tendencies through the next several decades toward a technotronic era, a dictatorship, leaving less and less room for political procedures as we now know them. Finally, looking ahead to the turn of the century, the possibility of biochemical and mind control and genetic tinkering with man, including beings which will function like men and reason like them, could give rise to some difficult questions."

    wow.
    what a nice guy.

    a real piece of shit, right?

    Does his description of how society will be changed (and this was from the early 1970s) sound like a eutopia to you or some sick 1984 fucking nightmare?

    Is this the kind of guy you Obama supporters want writing policy for the whitehouse?

    Seriously.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • i havent read the book. is he arguing for this or just predicting it? cuz i'd say he was right, unfortunately.
  • MrSmith wrote:
    i havent read the book. is he arguing for this or just predicting it? cuz i'd say he was right, unfortunately.

    I haven't read it either.
    Its now on my short list.
    I have to get through "Old Boys" first -- an out of print book about the origins of the CIA and of the Bilderberg group. Crazy shit.

    I did find this quazi-summary of The Technotronic Era ...
    ... if it is correct -- if this book was actually commissioned by the Club of Rome -- then the question is irrelevant.

    It doesn't matter if he is arguing for it or simply predicting it, because the very fact that he was commissioned to write it by the elite themselves is proof positive that the intentions of the book were simply to lay out the possibilities for the future, and to give "them" a better understanding of what they could be capable of achieving in the future.

    However, i will say, knowing what is known about Brzezinski, it shouldn't be too hard to deduce that he genuinely believes it is the providence of those of his ilk to rule over us lesser men. His place in the order has always been to advise his own masters of their options. He is "the left" version of Kissinger.

    Without further delay:
    some blog wrote:
    Brzezinski is the author of a book that should have been read by every American interested in the future of this country. Entitled The Technotronic Era, it was commissioned by the Club of Rome. The book is an open announcement of the manner and methods to be used to control the United States in the future. It also gave notice of cloning and "robotoids," i.e., people who acted like people and who seemed to be people, but who were not. Brzezinski, speaking for the Committee of 300 said the United States was moving "into an era unlike any of its predecessors; we are moving toward a technotronic era that could easily become a dictatorship." I reported fully on The Technotronic Era in 1981 and mentioned it in my newsletters a number of times.

    Brzezinski went on to say that our society "is now in an information revolution based on amusement focus, spectator spectacles (saturation coverage by television of sporting events) which provide an opiate for an increasingly purposeless mass." Was Brzezinski another seer and a prophet? Could he see into the future? The answer is NO; what he wrote in his book was simply copied from the Committee of 300's blueprint given to the Club of Rome for execution. Isn't it true that by 1991 we already have a purposeless mass of citizens? We could say that 30 million unemployed and 4 million homeless people are a "purposeless mass," or at least the nucleus of one.

    In addition to religion, "the opiate of the masses" which Lenin and Marx acknowledged was needed, we now have the opiates of mass spectator sport, unbridled sexual lusts, rock music and a whole new generation of drug addicts. Mindless sex and an epidemic of drug usage was created to distract people from what is happening all around them. In The Technotronic Era Brzezinski talks about "the masses" as if people are some inanimate object - which is possibly how we are viewed by the Committee of 300. He continually refers to the necessity of controlling us "masses".

    At one point, he lets the cat out of the bag:

    "At the same time the capacity to assert social and political control over the individual will vastly increase. It will soon be possible to assert almost continuous control over every citizen and to maintain up-to-date files, containing even the most personal details about health and personal behavior of every citizen in addition to the more customary data.

    "These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. Power will gravitate into the hands of those who control information. Our existing institutions will be supplanted by pre-crisis management institutions, the task of which will be to identify in advance likely social crises and to develop programs to cope with them. (This describes the structure of FEMA which came much later.)

    "This will encourage tendencies through the next several decades toward a Technotronic Era, a dictatorship, leaving even less room for political procedures as we know them. Finally, looking ahead to the end of the century, the possibility of biochemical mind control and genetic tinkering with man, including beings which will function like men and reason like them as well, could give rise to some difficult questions."

    Brzezinski was not writing as a private citizen but as Carter's National Security Advisor and a leading member of the Club of Rome and a member of the Committee of 300, a member of the CFR and as a member of the old Polish Black Nobility. His book explains how America must leave its industrial base behind and enter into what is called "a distinct new historical era."
    -source
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
Sign In or Register to comment.