Why We NEED Giuliani As President

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Giuliani will bomb the world into submission/oblivion to spread democratic love.

Actually....so will all the mainstream candidates.

even *gasp* Obama... (big shocker)

that is absolutely false. mcgyver is that you? I didnt know 2 accounts were allowed.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jlew24asu wrote:

that is absolutely false. mcgyver is that you? I didnt know 2 accounts were allowed.

I think pretty much all of them will drop the hammer at the next terrorist incident. I think it's a mistake to think any of them are as anti war as they say they are, and if looking at their advisor's is any further indication, perhaps even more so then that.

The US can't back down on the terrorism situation, and it won't.

This is the catch 22 I'm seeing.

xavier mcdaniel

because he needs to exert his influence to get the yankees more world series titles....

Bu2

He can put a noun, a verb, and 9/11 together into one sentence!!

Other than that, well........Judith loves him. Other than that, well........








Obama 2008

dcfaithful

so we can be represented by another war obsessed jackass...yeah, let's not fuck up and make a stupid decision again okay people?

rigneyclan

lots of lulz in this thread

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

I think pretty much all of them will drop the hammer at the next terrorist incident. I think it's a mistake to think any of them are as anti war as they say they are, and if looking at their advisor's is any further indication, perhaps even more so then that.

The US can't back down on the terrorism situation, and it won't.

This is the catch 22 I'm seeing.

should the US not drop the hammer if we are attacked again? I dont want a president that will do nothing if we area attacked

macgyver06

SilverSeed wrote:

Why not? Reagan did it and he's like, the best president ever.

lets not forget...although textbooks and the media will tell you reagans legacy was his economic strategies... lets not forget where he got a lot of that money from and i will give you a hint.


its what goes through a soldiers body in the middle east.

macgyver06

jlew24asu wrote:

should the US not drop the hammer if we are attacked again? I dont want a president that will do nothing if we area attacked

we are doing nothing now...why would that change.... not going to war...is actually doing something really great..

jlew24asu

macgyver06 wrote:

we are doing nothing now...why would that change.... not going to war...is actually doing something really great..

how are we doing nothing? we are involved in 2 wars. no war is great. but war would be brought upon us if we were attacked again and I wouldnt want a president who will do nothing.

dude seriously, vote gravel!!!! YEA!

macgyver06

jlew24asu wrote:

how are we doing nothing? we are involved in 2 wars. no war is great. but war would be brought upon us if we were attacked again and I wouldnt want a president who will do nothing.

dude seriously, vote gravel!!!! YEA!

its painful arguing and trying to teach you because...


1. yo dont understand concepts and apparently still have false idea on whats actually going on in the middle east

2. you just don't listen....instead you continue your dumbass mannerisms.



and if you dont understand something...you should send a private message...letting visitors to the board know you dont comprehend subjects very well is not wise

trappedinmyradio

macgyver06 wrote:

because we want more wars based on cowardly and stupid intentions?


they hate our freedom? lol

freedom isnt free? lol

cowardly? how about aggressive? stupid intentions? how about self-serving?

writersu

jlew24asu wrote:

should the US not drop the hammer if we are attacked again? I dont want a president that will do nothing if we area attacked

yeah, I agree 100%. how soon we al forget the fervor we had after 9/11, the patriotism, the courage to claim our rights to not be intimidated by terrorists, etc. now, we have all gotten fat, stupid and impatient because the war didn't end in the thirty minute sitcom time that most people can muster the attention for and nothing more.

writersu

macgyver06 wrote:

its painful arguing and trying to teach you because...


1. yo dont understand concepts and apparently still have false idea on whats actually going on in the middle east

2. you just don't listen....instead you continue your dumbass mannerisms.



and if you dont understand something...you should send a private message...letting visitors to the board know you dont comprehend subjects very well is not wise

who doesn't know what they are talking about? you should stop watching Michael Moore movies and check out the real news......

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jlew24asu wrote:

should the US not drop the hammer if we are attacked again? I dont want a president that will do nothing if we area attacked

Regardless of who is elected, the US has no choice in the matter, it's all or nothing until the money runs out, or one side is eradicated. The "other side" is not contained to the middle east.

It's almost certainly going to get a a lot worse than it is now. The term spent into oblivion comes to mind. It's going to be an extremely difficult situation to resolve. It may never resolve short of full scale nuclear war, as more countries will get sucked in.

There really is no winning...just losing on both sides.

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Regardless of who is elected, the US has no choice in the matter, it's all or nothing until the money runs out, or one side is eradicated. The "other side" is not contained to the middle east.

It's almost certainly going to get a a lot worse than it is now. The term spent into oblivion comes to mind. It's going to be an extremely difficult situation to resolve. It may never resolve short of full scale nuclear war, as more countries will get sucked in.

There really is no winning...just losing on both sides.

well not all of us have such a grim outlook on life.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jlew24asu wrote:

well not all of us have such a grim outlook on life.

I'm a realist. Who do you see backing down?

How do you see this situation succeeding is probably a better question.

jlew24asu

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

I'm a realist. Who do you see backing down?

How do you see this situation succeeding is probably a better question.

you are far from a realist. you are the one who believes the US government planted bombs in WTC and the media digitally enhanced our TVs to make us believe planes hit the buildings. your a joke.

my optimistic outlook.....Israel and palestine come to a land agreement, Iraq becomes peaceful and stable. Iran's nutty president leaves office because of 20% inflation in the country. US and Iran get new presidents who may be civil with one another. islamic extremism is isolated in the mountains of pakistan. something like that.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jlew24asu wrote:

you are far from a realist. you are the one who believes the US government planted bombs in WTC and the media digitally enhanced our TVs to make us believe planes hit the buildings. your a joke.

my optimistic outlook.....Israel and palestine come to a land agreement, Iraq becomes peaceful and stable. Iran's nutty president leaves office because of 20% inflation in the country. US and Iran get new presidents who may be civil with one another. islamic extremism is isolated in the mountains of pakistan. something like that.

I questioned 9/11. Actually....I still do. I don't proclaim it's my mantra. I posted one...(one)...(that's one)...thread questioning a video of airplanes hoping to have a somewhat reasonable discussion about it, and you went f-ing apeshit over it to the point you're still bringing it up like half a year later. I find it interesting you can dish out insults but when you detect even the slightest nuance of one, you short circuit and switch into into attack mode.

I think when we see wars carrying out in a region for hundreds of years, and decide to get tits deep into the mix, it's not going to be fixed without considerable amounts of consequence and time, I think that is what one could call a realistic interpretation of the situation.

Commy

When NYC firefighters dont' even want Guiliani for president maybe you should rethink your support for this corporate whore.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/giuliani_firefighters_blast_over_911_clean_up.htm