Barack Obama is a CFR Puppet, and the NWO is his Puppeteer! VIDEO PROOF

DriftingByTheStormDriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
edited February 2008 in A Moving Train
Barack Obama speaks to the CFR.

Seriously.
WATCH THIS
Watch the whole thing. Just put away your "this is silly, and sensational" claims everytime Alex starts predicting the future, and LISTEN TO WHAT IS DISCUSSED CONCERNING HISTORY, AND THE PRESENT. Put 2 and 2 together. IT IS REAL. IT IS HAPPENING. The conclusion is anyones best guess, but it DON'T LOOK PRETTY!

FYI
The thread title is intentionaly derisive.
For shock value.

Honestly I'm not sure WHAT to think of Barack.
For all i know he could have sought CFR approval, since it is a necessary requirement to become president (let me know who the last NON CFR president was, ok?) ... and maybe he IS genuine in his concern for liberty and humanity, and he is just infiltrating the belly of the beast.

But i suspect that he is somewhere between "puppet" and "fully complicit agent" of this globalist elitist agenda!
To be truthful, my intention is not to upset people by insulting their sincere desire to choose "change", i just want them to be aware of the nature of their world. The CFR\Trilateral\Bilderberg EXIST, and their intentions seem pretty explicit. Look at the Rockefeller quotes. Go read the "politics" section of the H. G. Wells wiki page. WATCH THAT MOVIE!

How much "change" is going to come from someone who in all likelyhood is working with the approval of and within the CFR establishment?

Also, for all those who want someone who will "UNITE" America?
DON'T WE ALREADY HAVE A HOPELESSLY "RALLY ROUND THE FLAG" MENTALITY?
Aren't both sides just one?
What good is it to further unite a bunch of scum?
Don't we want someone who will cause us to THINK CRITICALY and ARGUE FIERCELY over what is really in the best interest of our country?
Do we really want to just swallow blindly this "Let us all unite for the common good" crap? Who is setting that "common good" policy? Cause i can tell you. It smells like fucking bilderberg bullshit.

Go ahead.
I hear the word "tinfoil" being formed a few places.
:D
If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • So Hillary is the better choice then? Look I'm not going to throw away my vote on a fringe candidate either based on TNWO that may or may not happen. If it is coming it is nothing anyone of these people running can stop. When I get home from work I will check out this doomsday video and see if Obama is making "deals with the devil" as you are implying but Im really sick and tired of being so goddamn negative about our country and the direction the world is going.

    Obama makes me think it MIGHT be possible for things to turn for the better.

    I'm not going to let some paranoid NWO nut job be my credible source of information on Obama. But I'll check it out.
    10.31.93 / 10.1.94 / 6.24.95 / 11.4.95 / 10.19-20.96 / 7.16.98 / 7.21.98 / 10.31.00 /8.4.01 Nader Rally/ 10.21.01 / 12.8-9.02 / 6.01.03 / 9.1.05 / 7.15-16,18.06 / 7.20.06 / 7.22-23.06 / Lolla 07
  • NevermindNevermind Posts: 1,006
    The election is rigged. As you can see on that page John Mccain or Hilary Clinton will be our next president unless we get our little suprise this year.
  • So Hillary is the better choice then?

    Actualy EVERY candidate, EXCEPT RON PAUL and MIKE HUCKABEE, are CFR members.

    Hillary has been to MULTIPLE Bilderberg meetings.
    And actualy, i believe she is THE PREFERED NOMINEE out of the entire pack of candidates.

    I think the CFR views Obama as just a bit too "for the people" ... although i think in GENERAL he totes their line ... just not within the comfortable margin they prefer. Hillary basicaly sucks CFR cock. Obama is more of a swift handjob kind've guy ... maybe he even wears gloves ... and i applaud him for that.

    But i'm just pointing out he is not some Anti-Establishment of-the-people real-change candidate. He is as close to the establishment as they come, outside of a true shmuck like Hillary.

    And i'm not some paranoid NWO nutjob.
    I'm someone who knows the truth when they see it.
    From what i get out of your posts, you don't pay much attention to it.

    This is just more of the same bullshit i was talking about in another post. People in America are WAY to concerned with this "book by the cover" mentality ... when picking their candidates, and when deciding what to believe about the world.

    People read or watch something that at first glance appears sensational, and they say, "aw man, this is conspiracy bullshit. These people are idiots." ... if they did even a basic google search, or read the most basic of books on the subject, they would see that at least 85% of it is pure truth.

    The Bilderberg is a group that until the mid 90s met in ABSOLUTE MEDIA BLACKOUT conditions ... it is THE POWER ELITE of the world, and they meet behind closed doors, with the highest state officials of all the world, and all the ceos of the largest corporations, etc etc ... and they meet ALL the candidates they want elected, BEFORE they get the nomination ... CARTER, CLINTON, BUSH ... HR CLINTON, etc ... not only that but it is a group that has its roots in EARLY 1900s. These people (the rockefellers and the rothschilds being the preeminent power-mongers) have had their hands in politics and world-manipulation for a LONG time. Hell watch that movie, the Rothschilds bought up most of England during the Napoleonic wars! They came together with the Rockefellers and the Morgans to form the Federal Reserve, and get you that nice income tax ... and then in the 30s they told the president to take away all the gold in America and give it to the banks ... under threat of heavy fines and 10 years in jail! Nice people huh?

    People need to start realizing just because they haven't heard about it on the nightly news doesn't mean it is some stupid conspiracy.
    Actualy, the fact that you have never heard about it on the nightly news should clue you in that it is a VERY REAL conspiracy!

    :rolleyes:
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • NevermindNevermind Posts: 1,006
    Post problem
  • NevermindNevermind Posts: 1,006
    You should read David Rockefellers autobiography.
    "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
  • Nevermind wrote:
    You should read David Rockefellers autobiography.
    "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

    2 more great ones:

    "Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."

    -- David Rockefeller, 1973, on Mao Tse-tung: (NY Times, 1973-10-08)


    "For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will.

    If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
    David Rockefeller, autobiography 'Memoirs' , 6-11-6
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    what exactly is the problem with CFR?
  • I wasn't calling you a NWO nutjob... I was referring to Alex Jones...

    AND for the most part I know of, and agree with most of what you have brought up... I just don't believe it is all doom and gloom for us if Obama is elected. There is a chance things could move in another direction and maybe then we can make some progress. If Hillary is it then, yes... we are one more step closer. If another republican wins the election it will be more proof the country is filled with idiots.

    BTW are you running for office? If not, why? You seem to have it all figured out. You can help enlighten the rest of the populous instead of ranting on a music message board. I mean if you truly believe half the stuff you post I would think you would have a campaign in full swing.
    10.31.93 / 10.1.94 / 6.24.95 / 11.4.95 / 10.19-20.96 / 7.16.98 / 7.21.98 / 10.31.00 /8.4.01 Nader Rally/ 10.21.01 / 12.8-9.02 / 6.01.03 / 9.1.05 / 7.15-16,18.06 / 7.20.06 / 7.22-23.06 / Lolla 07
  • I wasn't calling you a NWO nutjob... I was referring to Alex Jones...

    AND for the most part I know of, and agree with most of what you have brought up... I just don't believe it is all doom and gloom for us if Obama is elected. There is a chance things could move in another direction and maybe then we can make some progress. If Hillary is it then, yes... we are one more step closer. If another republican wins the election it will be more proof the country is filled with idiots.

    BTW are you running for office? If not, why? You seem to have it all figured out. You can help enlighten the rest of the populous instead of ranting on a music message board. I mean if you truly believe half the stuff you post I would think you would have a campaign in full swing.

    I like you, man. I really do. Like i said: We agree fundamentaly alot more than we disagree. We are either arguing semantics or on the finer points of bullshit.

    I also agree that Obama is infinitely better than ANY of the other candidates, save for Ron Paul. But i don't want people to think that he is some radical running against the system. He is still part of it. I agree, he is the red headed step child ... the one they would seeming prefer NOT get the nod ... but then again ... i don't think he would be up on that stage and propped up all over the airwaves if he didn't fall LARGELY in line with their agenda.

    Why don't I run for office?
    Man i've got skeletons in my closet that would make "not inhaling" seem saintly. There is no way in hell i will make it through, though i've thought about it. Also, i have no love for "the process", and as you can tell by my posts i'm not much of a "bridge builder" and i don't do well speaking face to face with people i have utter contempt for. I am no kiss ass, and that would make me the blackest of black sheeps faster than you can say "bahhhhhh".

    I have other plans though. I'm working on a highly radical advocacy venture with some buddies of mine, but it's largely underwraps until we get it fleshed out a bit more. And until i can get the funds i really need. ;)


    Now.
    On to JLEW
    what exactly is the problem with CFR?

    Dude, i'm not even going to try to flesh that out in one post.
    Watch that video for starters.
    Just the fact that it was started by Rockefeller is good enough for me at this point. Though there is PLENTY wrong with it.
    It is the advocacy group of the ultra-wealthy elitist criminal fucks ... you're talking about people, some of whom are advocates of eugenics and opponets of democracy. These are people who ADMITTEDLY view CHINA as their global model of choice! Why would i support that !?!?!

    DID YOU READ THIS quote?

    "Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."

    -- David Rockefeller, 1973, on Mao Tse-tung: (NY Times, 1973-10-08)

    You think Mao was an admirable man?
    You think that his reign was one of the most important and successful in human history?

    WTF? WTF WTF WTF?
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • I like you, man. I really do. Like i said: We agree fundamentaly alot more than we disagree. We are either arguing semantics or on the finer points of bullshit.

    I also agree that Obama is infinitely better than ANY of the other candidates, save for Ron Paul. But i don't want people to think that he is some radical running against the system. He is still part of it. I agree, he is the red headed step child ... the one they would seeming prefer NOT get the nod ... but then again ... i don't think he would be up on that stage and propped up all over the airwaves if he didn't fall LARGELY in line with their agenda.

    Why don't I run for office?
    Man i've got skeletons in my closet that would make "not inhaling" seem saintly. There is no way in hell i will make it through, though i've thought about it. Also, i have no love for "the process", and as you can tell by my posts i'm not much of a "bridge builder" and i don't do well speaking face to face with people i have utter contempt for. I am no kiss ass, and that would make me the blackest of black sheeps faster than you can say "bahhhhhh".

    I have other plans though. I'm working on a highly radical advocacy venture with some buddies of mine, but it's largely underwraps until we get it fleshed out a bit more. And until i can get the funds i really need. ;)

    Fair enough dude...
    10.31.93 / 10.1.94 / 6.24.95 / 11.4.95 / 10.19-20.96 / 7.16.98 / 7.21.98 / 10.31.00 /8.4.01 Nader Rally/ 10.21.01 / 12.8-9.02 / 6.01.03 / 9.1.05 / 7.15-16,18.06 / 7.20.06 / 7.22-23.06 / Lolla 07
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Now.
    On to JLEW


    Dude, i'm not even going to try to flesh that out in one post.
    Watch that video for starters.
    Just the fact that it was started by Rockefeller is good enough for me at this point. Though there is PLENTY wrong with it.
    It is the advocacy group of the ultra-wealthy elitist criminal fucks ... you're talking about people, some of whom are advocates of eugenics and opponets of democracy. These are people who ADMITTEDLY view CHINA as their global model of choice! Why would i support that !?!?!

    DID YOU READ THIS quote?

    "Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."

    -- David Rockefeller, 1973, on Mao Tse-tung: (NY Times, 1973-10-08)

    You think Mao was an admirable man?
    You think that his reign was one of the most important and successful in human history?

    WTF? WTF WTF WTF?

    cool
    I really dont know much about them.
  • spiral outspiral out Posts: 1,052
    But i suspect that he is somewhere between "puppet" and "fully complicit agent" of this globalist elitist agenda!

    I suspect they are all puppets for the globalist elite. And those that aren't haven't a hope in hell of getting elected anyway. I know for sure the two main party leaders here are puppets. They talk the talk but end up carrying on the same crap that last useless monkey started.

    Even if the people were more aware and voted a good guy in, they would just program there vote machines to make there guy win.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • JUST AN FYI.
    This came up in another thread.
    Thought it bared repeating here as further evidence of my thread title.

    BARACK OBAMA IS THE ESTABLISHMENT.

    DO NOT BE FOOLED!
    Nevermind wrote:
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3284825.ece
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=FxyPBmZE69s&feature=related
    AMY GOODMAN: Barack Obama?

    ALLAN NAIRN: Well, Obama’s top adviser is Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brzezinski gave an interview to the French press a number of years ago where he boasted about the fact that it was he who created the whole Afghan jihadi movement, the movement that produced Osama bin Laden. And he was asked by the interviewer, “Well, don’t you think this might have had some bad consequences?” And Brzezinski replied, “Absolutely not. It was definitely worth it, because we were going after the Soviets. We were getting the Soviets.” Another top Obama person—

    AMY GOODMAN: I think his comment actually was, “What’s a few riled-up Muslims?” And this, that whole idea of blowback, the idea of arming, financing, training the Mujahideen in Afghanistan to fight the Soviets, including Osama bin Laden, and then when they’re done with the Soviets, they set their sights, well, on the United States.

    ALLAN NAIRN:

    Another key Obama adviser, Anthony Lake, he was the main force behind the US invasion of Haiti in the mid-Clinton years during which they brought back Aristide essentially in political chains, pledged to support a World Bank/IMF overhaul of the economy, which resulted in an increase in malnutrition deaths among Haitians and set the stage for the current ongoing political disaster in Haiti.

    Another Obama adviser, General Merrill McPeak, an Air Force man, who not long after the Dili massacre in East Timor in ’91 that you and I survived, he was—I happened to see on Indonesian TV shortly after that—there was General McPeak overseeing the delivery to Indonesia of US fighter planes.

    ...

    Another Obama adviser, Sarah Sewall, who heads a human rights center at Harvard and is a former Defense official, she wrote the introduction to General Petraeus’s Marine Corps/Army counterinsurgency handbook, the handbook that is now being used worldwide by US troops in various killing operations. That’s the Obama team.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2008/1/3/vote_for_change_atrocity_linked_us
    Are you fucking serious !!@?#@!?!#??
    I just did a FUCKING SPIT TAKE!

    I swear to god folks.
    I just lost ALL respect for Obama!
    ALL OF IT.

    Zbigniew Brzezinski is CFR, Trilateral, & Bilderberg.... ALL OF THEM.

    Read it here! ... Tri-Lateral Commission co-founder with David Rockefeller!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    This IS the establishment.

    This IS NOT CHANGE!

    This is like the day i found out that Huckabee's top advisor was Richard Haas. THAT IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE FUCKING CFR!

    Do you people not see a VERY REAL pattern here?

    These people are ALL CFR\Bilderberg\Trilateral. They are ALL representatives\puppets of the elite.

    Either direct sympathizers of the money-trust, or mere actors on a stage, allowed to dance around, paid money to do a song and dance for the public ... to do a fucking pupet show ... and to go out and do it extra hard every four years ... hell, they have to even have a boxing match, and get ugly with eachother. BUT IT IS ALL JUST FOR SHOW!

    WHY IS OBAMA SO GODDAMN FUCKING FRIENDLY WITH HILLARY !?!

    At the end of the day, every debate, they practicaly make love to eachother after some bickering over feeble differences (my plan vs your plan, this dollar vs that dollar, blah blah blah) ... but they are one and the same. And so are their republican counterparts.

    ISN'T POLITICS SUPPOSED TO BE PERSONAL & HEATED?

    Seriously. We are talking about the way the country\western world is run\dominated.
    IF SOMEONE SERIOUSLY DISAGREES WITH YOU, isn't that cause to be passionately opposed? Do you really go and fucking hug them and show your support? "Hey i know we are diametricaly opposed on every issue possible, but you're a decent fellow." ... no ... thats only how you act if its a fucking GAME. THIS IS NOT A GAME! This is how your life is going to be run. Because that is what these people want: TO RUN YOUR LIFE. They don't want you to have REAL liberty, they want to keep you pacified. And Obama sure seems to be the great pacifier. "Oh okay, we can all be happy now. We have a 'GOOD' guy in office." Yeah right!
    People think about this stuff.

    These people are all memebers of the same private clubs ... the same highly exclusive "think tanks" where the SUPERDUPERELITE get together and plot and scheme to STAY IN POWER.

    Obama just gave you the giant clue you need to figure that out, and his name is Zbigniew Brzezinski.

    Obama = ONE OF THEM!
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • No shit. For all of Obama's talk about change, he's stayed about as far away from discussing any real change as he can. All the candidates have minus Ron Paul, who scares me only a little less than the CFR.

    I hope that people realize soon that there is a lot more that people can do in a democracy than just voting. None of this stuff is going to be solved unless we get off our asses and make this country/world ours.
    Jimmy Carter has disco fever.
  • No shit. For all of Obama's talk about change, he's stayed about as far away from discussing any real change as he can. All the candidates have minus Ron Paul, who scares me only a little less than the CFR.

    I hope that people realize soon that there is a lot more that people can do in a democracy than just voting. None of this stuff is going to be solved unless we get off our asses and make this country/world ours.

    The Ron Paul movement is quickly becoming the LIBERTY movement, and is already planning a full campaign to take back the House & Senate ... along with establishing policy,media, & advocacy arms that support such a platform.

    It is anything but sitting on its ass.

    And i'm sorry that the pursuit of liberty is so scary to you.

    What WOULD you find comfort in?

    I'm not sure i see much middle ground between these two points of view. Either you support the establishment or you want to violently overturn it (figuratively violent)!

    There is no easy way out. They will cause our economy to collapse so they can gain ultimate control, or we can try to save our liberty and deal with the crash that they set up in the first place. We can't ndo the great harms they've done us, but we can try to cauterize the wounds and get on with the republic!
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • The Ron Paul movement is quickly becoming the LIBERTY movement, and is already planning a full campaign to take back the House & Senate ... along with establishing policy,media, & advocacy arms that support such a platform.

    It is anything but sitting on its ass.

    And i'm sorry that the pursuit of liberty is so scary to you.

    What WOULD you find comfort in?

    I'm not sure i see much middle ground between these two points of view. Either you support the establishment or you want to violently overturn it (figuratively violent)!

    There is no easy way out. They will cause our economy to collapse so they can gain ultimate control, or we can try to save our liberty and deal with the crash that they set up in the first place. We can't ndo the great harms they've done us, but we can try to cauterize the wounds and get on with the republic!
    I'm an anarchist. I do not support the "establishment." Ron Paul would not "violently overturn" the "establishment," stop kidding yourself. If I was going to support an unwinable candidate, I would support Brian Moore. However, it's pretty clear that our country is not a true democracy by any stretch of the imagination. Elections will never fix this problem, we need to make our voice heard by other means.

    And I could never, ever support Ron Paul's policies.
    Jimmy Carter has disco fever.
  • So Hillary is the better choice then? Look I'm not going to throw away my vote on a fringe candidate either based on TNWO that may or may not happen. If it is coming it is nothing anyone of these people running can stop. When I get home from work I will check out this doomsday video and see if Obama is making "deals with the devil" as you are implying but Im really sick and tired of being so goddamn negative about our country and the direction the world is going.

    Obama makes me think it MIGHT be possible for things to turn for the better.

    I'm not going to let some paranoid NWO nut job be my credible source of information on Obama. But I'll check it out.

    Ron Paul is the best choice.......period........not Hitlery
    PEARL JAM~Lubbock, TX. 10~18~00
    PEARL JAM~San Antonio, TX. 4~5~03
    INCUBUS~Houston, TX. 1~19~07
    INCUBUS~Denver, CO. 2~8~07
    Lollapalooza~Chicago, IL. 8~5~07
    INCUBUS~Austin, TX. 9~3~07
    Bonnaroo~Manchester, TN 6~14~08
Sign In or Register to comment.