Barack Obama -- Honest But Utterly Ignornat, or Abject Liar?
DriftingByTheStorm
Posts: 8,684
Check this out...
Obama answering questions at an event.
Now.
Notice the first segment,
he says he "sees no evidence of a plan to build a union."
Hell, he couldn't even remember the term, "union".
Now,
watch this - the V.P of Jefferies talking candidly about the NAU and the Amero. He acknowledges that most Americans have "their head in the sand."
Truth? Uh, yeah.
And this:
Dobbs talking about most recent SPP meeting in NOLA
Notice Dobbs has a member of congress on to acknowledge that the president is NOT discussing this with our elected representatives.
Concerned?
NOW GO BACK AND LISTEN TO THE SECOND QUESTION OBAMA GETS ASKED.
After having heard his response to the first question,
and then watching the two other videos I posted,
CAN YOU BELIEVE HIM?
Is he just a completely ignorant goober who thinks he is JFK, or is he a lying globalist puppet?
Obama answering questions at an event.
Now.
Notice the first segment,
he says he "sees no evidence of a plan to build a union."
Hell, he couldn't even remember the term, "union".
Now,
watch this - the V.P of Jefferies talking candidly about the NAU and the Amero. He acknowledges that most Americans have "their head in the sand."
Truth? Uh, yeah.
And this:
Dobbs talking about most recent SPP meeting in NOLA
Notice Dobbs has a member of congress on to acknowledge that the president is NOT discussing this with our elected representatives.
Concerned?
NOW GO BACK AND LISTEN TO THE SECOND QUESTION OBAMA GETS ASKED.
After having heard his response to the first question,
and then watching the two other videos I posted,
CAN YOU BELIEVE HIM?
Is he just a completely ignorant goober who thinks he is JFK, or is he a lying globalist puppet?
If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?
If I opened it now would you not understand?
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
This is one very savvy dude. "Bumbling" isn't so becoming of him.....Plus I liked the way he smokescreened the first issue (CFR) and made it all cute and humourous.........
Although....I'm not sure it's an "either/or" re: globalist puppet vs ignorant goober.
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
Oh, you're right about that.
Compartmentalization is the modus operandi, for sure.
compartmentalization, need to know, plausible denial.
There is a reason that Bilderberg and CIA are intimately connected. Most people don't even know that. They are of the same cloth.
In fact all CIA directors have been CFR members,a nd the man who started the ONI was a founding member of Bilderberg.
CIA is very much an institution of the elite.
Anway, i got CIA on the brain, that was totaly off topic.
But you are correct.
I think the real question, as i have been asking all along, is -- does Obama UNDERSTAND, at ANY level, what he is getting in to, or is he a compeletly ignorant goober?
If he IS an ignorant goober, he must be living in a box. It is just not probable.
That is why i think he is so dangerous -- because he is able to PRETEND like he is all innocent and "good".
BTW, does anyone wonder why we keep getting LAWYERS up for office? Both the Clintons and Obama are laywers.
No WONDER they are so good at flat out lying.
Man i'm all over the place right now.
I need lunch.
If I opened it now would you not understand?
This one of the main reasons I don't like this man, I think he should have Dennis Kucinich as a running mate. even though that would never happen.
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
people need to investigate the way their candidates answer questions,
and think criticaly.
For Barack to deny that there is "evidence of a ... what was it you called it? Yes, a union." is just silly talk.
SPP is real.
The fact that the executive branch has 100% removed itself from the public perview and the oversight of congress is totally real.
The fact that obama denies this is insane!
If I opened it now would you not understand?
you guys crack me up!
noooooo, you don't say
Actually, we have better. He's not all that impressive.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
good point of view...
yeah, your way out there on the "lucky to have a lying dirt bag politician like barack obama" comment.
As far as you not wanting to trap your destiny with a fading empire,
i have to say its really cute that you think as a soverign country you have a choice in the matter.
Did you not see the video of the police planting provacateurs in the midst of a peacefull protest of the SPP sumit up in canada late last year?
it was admitted.
What is it, that you actually think you have a say in the matter?
What the globalists want, they will get.
They will use the Hegelian dialectic, and problem reaction solution to fuck you everytime.
There is no choice, only brute force, and ruthless coercion.
If I opened it now would you not understand?
am i a puppet brainwashed sheeple if i think the european union is a good thing? just asking...
i would like to see that...
link me up scotty
no. but it makes you a socialist, and also, imho, somewhat anti-american, and a chump.
and, by anti american, i don't mean, that because you disagree with me you are bad, you are entitled to your free speech, though, and beliefs,
but a belief that selling america out to globalist "democratic" institutions is somehow good for this country, is pretty poor patriotism, imho.
The founding fathers certainly would be rolling in their graves at the though.
And i swear to god, if someone mentions "slaves", because i brought up a bunch of "elitist white men", give me a fucking break. They gave you your freedoms, show some respect.
as for the SPP video, you'll have to do some of your own leg work, i can't spoon feed everything to you, i'm at work. google something like "spp canada protest cops" it shouldn't be hard.
you probably won't believe it anyhow, since its on youtube.
:cool:
If I opened it now would you not understand?
NDP leader Jack Layton sent out broadcast emails like crazy afterwards. Fuck, for a while there he was emailing me directly because I think I actually informed him about the NAU in the first place. I doubt he responds from his personal account and includes attachments to too many people out there.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
**as a fellow Canadian, I see a different persepctive than yield6 on the matter...I see that Canadians ARE getting wind of it up here...and there are politically aware Canadians who are distinctly concerned and watching what's happening re: the SPP/NAU because they agree with yield6....we don't want to "trap out destiny with a fading empire". The concern from such individuals is that the powers that be are working beyond the concern of the people, and beyond the power of the people, in very savvy ways and are bringing this about as we speak.
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
I think Obama is accurate saying "there is no evidence" of the union. There IS no evidence. (edit: beyond the stated purposes of the SPP meetings...anything else remains speculation at this point) That doesn't mean it's not going on. It just means we don't have any evidence of it.
It's also clear that he is using the "for the people" stuff in order to win votes, as politicians do. He knows the speak.
The bottom line for me is he betrayed his "charisma" with his smokescreening and what I thought was obvious silly pretending that he didn't even know what the NAU was called. It's a red flag for me....he's giving himself away. He definitely knows a lot more than he's telling people. And I'm not so quick to say what that is.
I see the problem with even idealist politicians is that they are thinking "above" the heads of the people, thinking in the people's "best interests", even when going against what the people state they want. It's dichotomous, elitist thinking. Granted, when the people hand over their power to such individuals as is the current way, they all buy into this dynamic. It keeps a few people in power, and many unempowered (by choice). I suspect Obama means well, but, he's still playing the imbalance game of the masses, however you look at it. It's what the vast majority wants at this time....albeit unconsciously. What I mean is people continue to co-create these dynamics and will have to live with that. The problem is, they are so caught up in the stories they tell themselves and others -- our personal agendas - that they miss out one what's really happening.
It's like a magic trick. Most of us keep ourselves focussed on what our right hand is doing while the left hand continues to conjure up illusions right before our eyes, that we must continue to live out.
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
what about the nafta super highway? what about citigroup, the law firm involved in the nafta super highway and some foreign countries trying to buy the penssylvanian turnpike? isn't that over 500 miles? didn't public tax money pay for that? why should it be owned by corporations?
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
Lots of mainstream coverage in the related links...none since it happened tho...
when the loonie first hit parity? They've been talking about this for years already. Maybe you just haven't heard much about it....
edit: forget that dobbs article...damn drive by posts
check this out:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8375
"While a vision is appealing, working on the infrastructure might yield more benefit and bring more people on board ('evolution by stealth')," John Manley at the 2006 North American Forum meeting at the Banff Springs....google it's guest list, it's pretty impressive.
also...'no desire to trap out destiny with a fading empire'?
80% of our exports go the US, and exports make up 40% of our GDP....I don't think we could possibly be any more trapped.
he doesn't know if he's a member of the council on foreign relations or not?? it's just a place where some ppl discuss foreign policy issues, nothing more??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations
Through its membership, meetings, and studies, it has been called the most powerful agent of United States foreign policy outside the State Department.....
It has exerted influence on U.S. foreign policy from the beginning, due to its roster of State Department and other government officials as members; as such, it has been the focus of many controversies (Perloff 37, et passim). A study by two critics of the organization, Laurence Shoup and William Minter, found that of 502 government officials surveyed from 1945 to 1972, more than half were members of the Council.[7]
.....the man sure can dodge a question, eh?
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way