FBI release new 9/11 footage of pentagon getting hit
darkcrow
Posts: 1,102
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/12/04/fbi-releases-neverbefore_n_35528.html
it is very grainy but you can see the explosion. i am sure itll kick off more conspiracy theorists
it is very grainy but you can see the explosion. i am sure itll kick off more conspiracy theorists
DOWNLOAD THE LATEST ISSUE OF The Last Reel: http://www.mediafire.com/?jdsqazrjzdt
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19604327965
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19604327965
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Soon, they will admit they demolished WTC7. Then there won't be anymore "government conspiracy" craze. The theories will always exist though.
I've seen this before. They released this footage to attempt to offset the conspiracy theorists, although all it shows is an explosion. And why was no debris of a plane found? Why was the point of impact so narrow? Where were the wings?
i wasnt aware it was seen... from what i read this is new...
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19604327965
Do you think that that's all there is to it? WTC7 collapsing? Why were no fighter jets scrambled until one hour after radio contact was lost? This is routine procedure and had been folowed 79 times that same year without fail. Why was this procedure abandoned on 9/11?
Oh, I'm not saying that's all of it. I'm actually implying that by holding information back, they can release it to the public in increments to quash the theories. Leaving whatever incriminating evidence undiscovered as the theorists begin to doubt their assertions. Assuming of course that there is incriminating evidence.
I havent seen this footage before.......... though they've release the pentagon security camera video for the first time................... twice.
Shame ya cant see more on this one............. kinda doesnt answer any question, no matter which side of the fence you sit on.
This video is just another example of nothing. It proves nothing and disproves nothing.
EDIT: and the video proves nothing. it doesn't make sense that they release these videos one at a time and so far apart. they show nothing that we don't already know. what is the point?
~Ron Burgundy
I was asking myself the same thing
it seems that the lawsuits would have went after the DOT traffic tape first.
~Ron Burgundy