Howard says no to HIV immigrants (australia)

darkcrowdarkcrow Posts: 1,102
edited April 2007 in A Moving Train
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6551245.stm

Howard calls for HIV migrant ban

Australia has seen a rise in the number of HIV cases in recent years
Australia should refuse to allow migrants or refugees with HIV to enter the country, Prime Minister John Howard has said.
Mr Howard said there may be special cases when an exemption could be considered but as a rule HIV-positive people should be denied entry.

Mr Howard was asked about the issue during a visit to Victoria state, which has seen a sharp rise in HIV cases.

Any ban for migrants with HIV/Aids would need a change in the federal law.

Mr Howard, on a visit to Melbourne, told a local radio station he wanted to seek more advice on the issue, but said his gut feeling was that HIV sufferers should not be allowed in to the country.

In the US, everyone arriving at Ellis Island was given a health exam and if you were found to be a carrier of certain diseases, you were sent back

Gerald, Chicago, USA


Send us your comments
"My initial reaction is no," he said. "There may be some humanitarian considerations that could temper that in certain cases, but, prime facie - no."

Victoria's public health officials have blamed the rise in HIV cases partly on overseas immigrants, but also on Australian residents relocating from other parts of the country.

Tuberculosis ban

Mr Howard, who has been in power for 11 years, is known for his tough stance on immigration.

He likened his proposed ban to the ban already imposed on people suffering from tuberculosis.


John Howard has a reputation for being tough on immigration
"I think we should have the most stringent possible conditions in relation to that nationwide, and I know the health minister is concerned about that and is examining ways of tightening things up," he said.

Solicitor David Puls of the New South Wales HIV/Aids Legal Centre said the law allowed immigrants to be denied access where there are public safety concerns.

"The Medical Officer of the Commonwealth does not consider HIV to be a public safety concern," he was quoted by the Australian newspaper as saying.

He added that HIV should not be compared with tuberculosis as the latter is airborne and contagious, while HIV is transmissible but not contagious.

Australia has been alarmed by the country's rise in HIV cases. Infection rates rose by 41% between 2000 and 2005.

There is particular concern about the rapid spread of HIV and Aids in neighbouring Pacific countries, such as Papua New Guinea.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    HIV is not contagious is it? i've yet to catch it from contact with positive people.

    oh oh of course what am i thinking.? it's an election year. time to freak out the constituency, right? :rolleyes:
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    my first reaction when I heard this on the radio this morning was about the practicality of it. I never had an HIV test, but from what I've seen, it takes a few weeks for results... if this is true, are they just going to hold people until the results are in?
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • JeanieJeanie Posts: 9,446
    my first reaction when I heard this on the radio this morning was about the practicality of it. I never had an HIV test, but from what I've seen, it takes a few weeks for results... if this is true, are they just going to hold people until the results are in?


    oh of course!! Johnny loves holding people in detention.
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
Sign In or Register to comment.