Huge surge in DEM popularity among younger generation

fragileblakefragileblake Posts: 716
edited April 2008 in A Moving Train
As soon as the baby-boomers all die, we'll be in the clear.

http://pewresearch.org/pubs/813/gen-dems

Gen Dems: The Party's Advantage Among Young Voters Widens

by Scott Keeter, Director Survey Research, Juliana Horowitz, Reasearch Associate and Alec Tyson, Research Assistant, Pew Research Center for the People & the Press

April 28, 2008

Trends in the opinions of America's youngest voters are often a barometer of shifting political winds. And that appears to be the case in 2008. The current generation of young voters, who came of age during the George W. Bush years, is leading the way in giving the Democrats a wide advantage in party identification, just as the previous generation of young people who grew up in the Reagan years -- Generation X -- fueled the Republican surge of the mid-1990's.

In surveys conducted between October 2007 and March 2008, 58% of voters under age 30 identified or leaned toward the Democratic Party, compared with 33% who identified or leaned toward the GOP. The Democratic Party's current lead in party identification among young voters has more than doubled since the 2004 campaign, from 11 points to 25 points.

In fact, the Democrats' advantage among the young is now so broad-based that younger men as well as younger women favor the Democrats over the GOP -- making their age category the only one in the electorate in which men are significantly more inclined to self-identify as Democrats rather than as Republicans. Use the interactive tool to track generational differences in party affiliation over time.

While more women voters in every age group affiliate with the Democratic Party rather than the GOP, the gap is particularly striking among young women voters; more than twice as many women voters under age 30 identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party as favor the Republican Party (63% vs. 28%).

This analysis is part of a series of reports on changes in the balance of party identification in the electorate. On March 20, the Center released breakdown of trends in party identification in Republican "red" states, Democratic "blue" states, and politically contested swing states.1

Since 2004, identification with the Democratic Party has increased across all age groups. Four years ago, 47% of all voters identified with or leaned toward the Democratic Party, while 44% identified with or leaned toward the GOP. In surveys from October through March, Democrats held a 13-point party identification advantage (51% to 38%).

Perhaps the most striking change since 2004 has come among voters born between 1956 and 1976 -- the members of Generation X and the later Baby Boomers. People in this age group tended to be more Republican during the 1990s, and the GOP still maintained a slight edge in partisan affiliation among Gen X and the late boomers in 2004 (47% identified with or leaned toward the GOP while 44% described themselves as Democrats or leaned Democratic).
Figure

Currently, 51% of voters in this age group affiliate with the Democratic Party or lean Democratic compared with 39% who describe themselves as Republicans or lean toward the GOP. Thus voters in Gen X and the latter part of the Baby Boom -- the most Republican age cohort four years ago -- now are about as Democratic as are older age groups, the early Baby Boomers and the so-called Silent Generation.

Still, the youngest voters -- the members of Generation Y, born in 1977 or later -- continue to stand out as the most Democratic age group. The Democrats' identification advantage among Gen Y voters, which was 13 points in 2004 (52% to 39%) has nearly doubled in the current presidential campaign to 24 points.

The Democratic Party has not always held an edge among the young. In 1992, young voters divided their partisan loyalties roughly evenly (46% Democratic, 47% Republican). By 1996, young voters were more Democratic than Republican, and the Democratic advantage increased slightly in 2000 and 2004.

Age differences in party affiliation are a result of a variety of influences, including the circumstances of individuals at different points in the life cycle as well as generational differences that reflect the political climate at the time when individuals were forming their political identity and loyalties. As the data from 1992 clearly show, young people are not necessarily more liberal or Democratic by virtue of their age alone.

The youngest voters in 1992 -- the members of Generation X -- were more Republican than most other age groups, in part reflecting the fact that they had come of age politically during a time in which conservative ideas were ascendant and the presidency was held by a popular Republican, Ronald Reagan.

In addition, those in the latter half of the Baby Boom generation, who were in their late 20s to mid-30s in 1992, also were more Republican than average; many of these individuals developed their political leanings in the late 1970s, during the troubled presidency of Jimmy Carter. By contrast, older Baby Boomers, who came of age politically during the turbulent and unpopular presidency of Richard Nixon, were more Democratic than most other age groups. Among older Americans in 1992, most of those then in their 50s -- also known as the "Silent" generation -- had come of age during the Eisenhower administration. Those ages 60 and older reached adulthood during the Democratic presidencies of Harry Truman and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Much of this generation is known as the "Greatest Generation," in honor of the sacrifices many made during World War II.

Since 1992, the Democratic Party has had a sizable advantage in partisan affiliation among women. But women voters now identify with the Democratic Party in greater numbers than in the past -- and the trend is particularly dramatic among younger women voters.

Fully 56% of women identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party, compared with 33% who identify or lean toward the GOP. Since 2004, the Democrats' lead in party affiliation among women has doubled (from 11 points to 22 points).

The overall gender gap in party affiliation has not increased since 2004, as male voters have also become somewhat more Democratic. Currently, the Democrats hold a slight 46%-43% edge among men voters; in 2004, somewhat more male voters were affiliated with or leaned toward the Republican Party than the Democratic Party (by 48% to 43%).

As is the case among all women voters, the Democratic advantage among young female voters has almost doubled since 2004. Four years ago, just over half of women under age 30 identified as Democrats (54%) and 36% identified as Republicans, an 18-point advantage. Today, Democrats hold a 35-point advantage, with more than six-in-ten women in this age group calling themselves Democrats (63%) and just 28% calling themselves Republicans.

The balance of party identification has also shifted dramatically among men ages 18-29. The Democratic Party now holds a 14-point advantage among this group (52% vs. 38%). This is a reversal from 1992, when 52% of men under age 30 called themselves Republicans and 42% called themselves Democrats. The gender gap in party affiliation among young voters has remained relatively stable since the 1992 election cycle and is consistent with the gap seen in the electorate as a whole.
Comparing Younger & Older Voters

More broadly, many of the demographic patterns evident in party identification among older voters also are seen in voters under age 30. For example, comparably large proportions of African Americans and liberals -- whether ages 30 and older, or younger than age 30 -- identify as Democrats.
Figure

In addition, roughly six-in-ten conservatives and white evangelical Protestants in both the older and younger age groups identify with the GOP.

However, there are notable differences by region in party affiliation between younger and older voters. For instance, young voters in the Midwest are almost twice as likely to identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party rather than the Republican Party (61%-32%). Among voters ages 30 and older in the Midwest, the Democrats hold a much narrower lead (49% to 39%). In the South, by contrast, there are smaller differences between older and younger voters.

In addition, higher proportions of voters under age 30 living in urban and suburban areas affiliate with the Democratic Party, compared with voters ages 30 and older in those communities. By contrast, there are virtually no age differences in party identification among young and older voters in rural areas.

The Democratic Party also holds a much greater advantage among younger voters with some college education than among voters ages 30 and older with some college. However, it is important to note that younger people with some college are fundamentally different from older people of similar education level. Among the younger group, "some college," includes many who are still in college. Among the older age groups, those with some college are likely to be people who started but never finished college.

Danny Dougherty, Jocelyn Kiley, Juliana Horowitz, Michael Dimock, Alec Tyson and Richard Auxier helped with conceptualization and production of the interactive feature. The graphic with 20th century presidents was inspired by Bill Marsh of the New York Times.
Notes

1 See "Fewer Voters Identify as Republicans," March 20, 2008.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • As soon as the baby-boomers all die, we'll be in the clear.
    quote]

    You're an idiot
    BORGATA>VIC
  • Yeah, I certainly said that with no sarcasm whatsoever.........yep
  • Didn't read the whole thing, but maybe peoples ideals shift over time. When they are younger they hold a different set of values and as the grow older and WISER they will finally come around.
    BORGATA>VIC
  • Gremmie95Gremmie95 Posts: 749
    this seems to follow the pattern of political shifts the past 75 years or so.
  • Ah yes, certainly someone can only be wise if they share your view point, yeah? Theres something clearly different among this (my) generation than in GEN X that can't simply be attributed to youthful idealism. Even the conservatives I know (who I respect and enjoy talking to even though they don't share my opinion) are much more libertarian than their older counter parts, the term "south park republican" comes to mind. Now part of this is certainly where I live, but I think theres something clearly going on.
  • It may follow a pattern and it may not. It may also be something completely different.


    Gremmie95 wrote:
    this seems to follow the pattern of political shifts the past 75 years or so.
  • reminds me of that quote:

    "If, at the age of twenty, one isn't a Communist, one has no heart. If, at the age of thirty, one is still a Communist, one has no brains."
  • It was actually "liberal" not "communist". And most people think it was Winston Churchill - but it wasn't:

    "If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain."

    * According to research by Mark T. Shirey, citing Nice Guys Finish Seventh: False Phrases, Spurious Sayings, and Familiar Misquotations by Ralph Keyes, 1992, this quote was first uttered by mid-nineteenth century historian and statesman François Guizot when he observed, Not to be a republican at 20 is proof of want of heart; to be one at 30 is proof of want of head. This quote has been attributed variously to George Bernard Shaw, Benjamin Disraeli, Otto von Bismarck, and others.
  • It was actually "liberal" not "communist". And most people think it was Winston Churchill - but it wasn't:

    "If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain."

    * According to research by Mark T. Shirey, citing Nice Guys Finish Seventh: False Phrases, Spurious Sayings, and Familiar Misquotations by Ralph Keyes, 1992, this quote was first uttered by mid-nineteenth century historian and statesman François Guizot when he observed, Not to be a republican at 20 is proof of want of heart; to be one at 30 is proof of want of head. This quote has been attributed variously to George Bernard Shaw, Benjamin Disraeli, Otto von Bismarck, and others.

    really? maybe someone just changed it over time. either way, i basically agree.
  • Yeah, who wants to think that someone that disagrees with them could still be rational and intelligent anyway? Is Hannity on yet?
    MrSmith wrote:
    really? maybe someone just changed it over time. either way, i basically agree.
  • Yeah, who wants to think that someone that disagrees with them could still be rational and intelligent anyway? Is Hannity on yet?

    so because i have a different viewpoint, i am automatically a foxnews watching zombie moron? what a hypocrite.

    I said i BASICALLY agree. as in generally. or often. its a fucking quote, not a goddamn scientific fact.
  • I didn't say you watched fox news, I just pointed out thats a typical attitude of someone like Sean Hannity. You're the one that thinks that all Liberals are stupid, how is that unlike Sean Hannity?
  • Okay, so you generally or often agree that Liberals are stupid. Again, how is that different than Sean Hannity?
    MrSmith wrote:
    so because i have a different viewpoint, i am automatically a foxnews watching zombie moron? what a hypocrite.

    I said i BASICALLY agree. as in generally. or often. its a fucking quote, not a goddamn law of science.
  • Okay, so you generally or often agree that Liberals are stupid. Again, how is that different than Sean Hannity?

    i only think 2/3s to 3/4s of people who disagree with me are stupid. Not sure what Hannity's percentage is.

    eh there are no stupid people, just stupid opinions. and stupid people with stupid opinions. the two often go hand in hand.

    slight clarification: i was speaking of fiscal liberals. social issues dont generally concern me. not that it matters.
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    Didn't read the whole thing, but maybe peoples ideals shift over time. When they are younger they hold a different set of values and as the grow older and WISER they will finally come around.



    while i will disagree about the wiser portion ;)...i will agree for many, their ideals and priorities shift over time, with age......and what the youth of today hold dear may not be what they hold dear in 20-30 years time.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • The Democrats don't seem very liberal to me. Maybe it's younger people supporting them based on their common perception of being liberal...if the argument here is about young people being more inclined to lean lefty.

    There are other options out there that are truly based on liberal ideals such as the greens, reform and some independents.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • I'm surprised you don't find democrats liberal enough, I haven't really heard you express that opinion before......
    The Democrats don't seem very liberal to me. Maybe it's younger people supporting them based on their common perception of being liberal...if the argument here is about young people being more inclined to lean lefty.

    There are other options out there that are truly based on liberal ideals such as the greens, reform and some independents.
  • I'm surprised you don't find democrats liberal enough, I haven't really heard you express that opinion before......


    Yeah, I keep that thought to myself very often...
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • TDMize15TDMize15 Posts: 166
    I will definitely vouch that most of the younger generation is shifting idealistic liberal (raises hand)...

    However, I would say that when most of them get older and actually pay their own taxes, by some miracle they will become more conservative.
    All the rusted signs, we ignore throughout our lives, choosing the shiny ones instead...

    And he who forgets, will be destined to remember...
  • LikeAnOceanLikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    It's all state of mind.
  • Smellyman2Smellyman2 Posts: 689
    I will definitely vouch that most of the younger generation is shifting idealistic liberal (raises hand)...

    However, I would say that when most of them get older and actually pay their own taxes, by some miracle they will become more conservative.

    I think it goes the other way more often.

    Young people are all about me me me. When they get older they realize they are selfish twats.
Sign In or Register to comment.