CitiGroup Saved…

pearljamfan1212

well since its from infowars it must be the truth huh?

DriftingByTheStorm

pearljamfan1212 wrote:

well since its from infowars it must be the truth huh?

Its actually NOT.
Its from global research.
Its called a RSS feed.
:cool:
and its not like the MSM is any more credible.
Puhlease.
The Economist, like CNBC, may make some accurate points about some things, but (like CNBC) it also just as often serves as a mouthpiece for certain vested interests.

In the case of The Economist, besides being half owned by Financial Times Ltd (The Financial Times of London being THE establishment paper of record), it is owned in large part by The Rothschild family, and they have always had family members on the board.
From 1972 until 1989 Sir Evelyn de Rothschild was the chairman of The Economist Group.

Lynn Forester de Rothschild (Lady De Rothschild) -- a primary fundraiser for Hillary Clinton, wife of the above Sir Evelyn De Rothschild -- is the current CEO of E.L. Rothschild, the holding company which owns much of "The Economist".

She also serves as a director of The Economist Newspaper Limited, in the capacity of member of the audit committee.

So now YOU are providing me sources of information related to a Rockefeller bank, sourced to a Rothschild company.
Both families being largely in cahoots to fuck over the common man throughout history.

So actual content of either of our articles be damned,
what gives you the right to poke fun at my source above yours?
:cool:

pearljamfan1212

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

Its actually NOT.
Its from global research.
Its called a RSS feed.
:cool:

as long as the evil jews didnt write it.

saveuplife

pearljamfan1212 wrote:

I just dont know. I think it would be a nightmare scenario. and I dont think people or businesses would be able to get financing for a very long time.

Do you think it would be worse than October 10th? Check the TED Spread now vs then...

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/cbuilder?ticker1=.TEDSP%3AIND

pearljamfan1212

saveuplife wrote:

Do you think it would be worse than October 10th? Check the TED Spread now vs then...

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/cbuilder?ticker1=.TEDSP%3AIND

yes I do. that spike came from Lehman going down, correct?

mammasan

pearljamfan1212 wrote:

yes I do. that spike came from Lehman going down, correct?

Or WAMU.

pearljamfan1212

mammasan wrote:

Or WAMU.

WaMu didnt collapse, it was purchased. no one bought lehman, it collapsed and lending immediately froze.

mammasan

pearljamfan1212 wrote:

WaMu didnt collapse, it was purchased. no one bought lehman, it collapsed and lending immediately froze.

Actually WAMU did collapse. It was taken over by the FDIC and then had it's assets sold to JP Morgan Chase.

pearljamfan1212

mammasan wrote:

Actually WAMU did collapse. It was taken over by the FDIC and then had it's assets sold to JP Morgan Chase.

o true true. but thanks to the FDIC take over, it didnt interrupt lending or effect the TED spread.....at least in comparison to the amount Lehmans collapse did.

DriftingByTheStorm

pearljamfan1212 wrote:

as long as the evil jews didnt write it.

Zionism and Judaism are wholly different, and actually diametrically opposed to eachother. The concept of a Jewish state is ananthema to the actual tenents of Judaism, and historicaly was backed by large statist interests (like Great Britain and The United States) along with large quantities of certain private Zionist wealth stemming from superfluously wealthy "Jews".

For you to muddy the water by throwing around the term "evil jews", even in jest, is actually FAR more offensive than anything i have written.

Simply regurgitating history, and iterating the truth with regards to sources, is NOT anti-semitic.

Insinuating that I am, is outright ignorant on your part.

saveuplife

pearljamfan1212 wrote:

yes I do. that spike came from Lehman going down, correct?

That spike came from a number of things. Lehaman going down in September most likely contributed, but remember the peak was almost a month later. That said, I don't think the TED Spread would have gone higher than that peak. And the sky didn't fall when it did peak before. But, I guess we'll never know.

pearljamfan1212

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

Zionism and Judaism are wholly different, and actually diametrically opposed to eachother. The concept of a Jewish state is ananthema to the actual tenents of Judaism, and historicaly was backed by large statist interests (like Great Britain and The United States) along with large quantities of certain private Zionist wealth stemming from overly wealth Jews.

For you to muddy the water by throwing around the term "evil jews", even in jest, is actually FAR more offensive than anything i have written.

Simply regurgitating history, and iterating the truth with regards to sources, is NOT anti-semitic.

Insinuating that I am, is outright ignorant on your part.

blah blah blah. I really dont give a flying fcuk about your fantasy with the evil jews and their firm control on the world. move along k?

pearljamfan1212

saveuplife wrote:

That spike came from a number of things. Lehaman going down in September most likely contributed, but remember the peak was almost a month later. That said, I don't think the TED Spread would have gone higher than that peak. And the sky didn't fall when it did peak before. But, I guess we'll never know.

yea we'll never know but I do think a Citi collapse would have great ramifications then Lehman going down. Citi has some 2-3 Trillion on the balance sheet. what did Lehamn have, not even a 1/5 of that? and look what happen. lending markets are still frozen up

DriftingByTheStorm

saveuplife wrote:

That spike came from a number of things. Lehaman going down in September most likely contributed, but remember the peak was almost a month later. That said, I don't think the TED Spread would have gone higher than that peak. And the sky didn't fall when it did peak before. But, I guess we'll never know.

Don't worry.
There is still time for a "real" meltdown.
I think Celente happens to be right.
The real gravity of this situation won't be acknowledged by the big players until after Christmas, and after the inauguration.

At that time, i think you will see the US financial system skip the light fandango and crash dive straightway quickly.

pearljamfan1212

think about this from the governments point of view. can they really sit back and literally do nothing ?

DriftingByTheStorm

pearljamfan1212 wrote:

blah blah blah. I really dont give a flying fcuk about your fantasy with the evil jews and their firm control on the world. move along k?

I didn't say shit about "firm control"

I quoted you historical FACTS.

You are being obtuse, dishonest, manipulative, and immature in your responses to my posts.

You insulted my source, insinuating that it was not reliable.
In turn, i showed you how your source was equally questionable or more so.
By reply you failed to give me any evidence that you understood such.
In fact, you haven't had ONE valid response.
Personal attacks seem to be your MO today.

:cool:

pearljamfan1212

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

I didn't say shit about "firm control"

I quoted you historical FACTS.

You are being obtuse, dishonest, manipulative, and immature in your responses to my posts.

In fact, you haven't had ONE valid response. Personal attacks seem to be your MO today.

:cool:

I havent personally attacked you at all. in fact, you attacked my source as some jewish run site. I'm not interested in getting into a jews run the world debate. I apologize for insulting your source. infowars is awesome now please stop replying to my posts.

Sludge Factory

pearljamfan1212 wrote:

I havent personally attacked you at all. in fact, you attacked my source as some jewish run site. I'm not interested in getting into a jews run the world debate. I apologize for insulting your source. infowars is awesome now please stop replying to my posts.

It obviously went over your head. Infowars wasn't the source of the article, it was merely relaying the article from it's original source: Global Research.

I don't recall Drifting saying your site was some jewish run site. He said it was a site owned by Rothschild interests which it is. It seems to me you are being a bit irrational.

know1

mammasan wrote:

…with our tax dollars. When is this going to end. When is our government going to stop bailing out failed corporations at the expense of America's tax dollars.


http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/23/news/companies/citigroup/index.htm?postversion=2008112400

It will never end until people vote out these crooked politicians.

I'm headed to Washington to ask for a handout to help me cover my bills - which include weekends at the movies, video games for my WII, cable TV, etc. I just can't afford it all!

pearljamfan1212

Sludge Factory wrote:

It obviously went over your head. Infowars wasn't the source of the article, it was merely relaying the article from it's original source: Global Research.

I don't recall Drifting saying your site was some jewish run site. He said it was a site owned by Rothschild interests which it is. It seems to me you are being a bit irrational.

it goes back to his claims in the other thread about jews running the financial system, and Rothschilds being the jews. I think its actually a little over your head.