WaMu seized by the FDIC

mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
edited September 2008 in A Moving Train
WaMu was just seized by the FDIC and sold to JP Morgan Chase.
"When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • How comes every time a deal is reached, or brokered, by the Federal Reserve, JP MORGAN CHASE ends up being the beneficiary?

    Hmm?

    Could it have something to do with the fact that JP Morgan built the goddamn Federal Reserve?

    No!
    Of course not.
    That would be a conspiracy.
    :rolleyes:

    All that being said,
    this was the largest bank failure in US History.

    No meltdown here.
    :cool:
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    How comes every time a deal is reached, or brokered, by the Federal Reserve, JP MORGAN CHASE ends up being the beneficiary?

    Hmm?

    Could it have something to do with the fact that JP Morgan built the goddamn Federal Reserve?

    No!
    Of course not.
    That would be a conspiracy.
    :rolleyes:

    All that being said,
    this was the largest bank failure in US History.

    No meltdown here.
    :cool:

    The fucked up part to this WaMu take over is that back in the summer WaMu was offered $8.00 a share by JP Morgan Chase and they refused because Kerry Killinger didn't want to loose his job. A few weeks ago WaMu was again offered $2.00 a share by Chase but again they refused because they where to fill of their own hubris. Now the FDIC seizes them and Chase buys up their assets, branches and deposit base. Their stock is worthless now so anyone who has WaMu stock, 20% of my girlfriend's 401k was WaMu stock and she had a couple of thousand dollars in stock, is screwed. My girlfriend will most likely loose her job now as well. That company was a perfect example of how greed by the CEo and upper management screws over the average person.

    They where the largest saving and loan bank in the country as well as the 4th largest credit card company in the country.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • Pacomc79Pacomc79 Posts: 9,404
    This is what happens when companies get to use the power of government to do thier bidding.

    This is the antithisis of competition.
    My Girlfriend said to me..."How many guitars do you need?" and I replied...."How many pairs of shoes do you need?" She got really quiet.
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    what is interesting is that only gov't can prevent this from happening but gov't had a direct hand in this fraud ...

    so - reality is that honest gov't is what is needed ... not corrupt gov't ...
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    polaris wrote:
    what is interesting is that only gov't can prevent this from happening but gov't had a direct hand in this fraud ...

    How unimaginitive to thinik that gov't is the only way. If the company had been run correctly, the board made sound decisions, the shareholders held the officers accountable, they could have avoided the mess.

    polaris wrote:
    so - reality is that honest gov't is what is needed ... not corrupt gov't ...

    reality is that there is no such thing as honest gov't.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    jeffbr wrote:
    How unimaginitive to thinik that gov't is the only way. If the company had been run correctly, the board made sound decisions, the shareholders held the officers accountable, they could have avoided the mess.




    reality is that there is no such thing as honest gov't.

    hey ... if you think given zero regulation a company is going to act in the interests of everyone - then you would be be defying history ...

    there are levels of honesty ... sadly tho - it's about as far from that in the US ...
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    jeffbr wrote:
    How unimaginitive to thinik that gov't is the only way. If the company had been run correctly, the board made sound decisions, the shareholders held the officers accountable, they could have avoided the mess.




    reality is that there is no such thing as honest gov't.


    I have to agree. WaMu's fall is solely the upper management's fault. My girlfriend told me that back in 2002 the vast majority of WaMu's mortgages where A paper mortgages. By 2007 the vast majority where B paper. They took a gamble because of greed, they wanted loans with adjustable interest rates so that they could make more money off of them, and it back fired on them. My girlfriend who is a regional manager for them was specifically told by her superiors to encourage the branches in her region to push more adjustable rate mortgages, specially no doc loans. They fucked themselves over.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    polaris wrote:
    hey ... if you think given zero regulation a company is going to act in the interests of everyone - then you would be be defying history ...

    there are levels of honesty ... sadly tho - it's about as far from that in the US ...

    The companies are still responsible for their actions. Just because the government said that they could do as they please doesn't mean that they had to do so.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    mammasan wrote:
    The companies are still responsible for their actions. Just because the government said that they could do as they please doesn't mean that they had to do so.

    so ... regulation is not the answer? ... really - how have the ceo's and upper management suffered? ... they still have their fat cheques and bonuses ...
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    polaris wrote:
    hey ... if you think given zero regulation a company is going to act in the interests of everyone - then you would be be defying history ...

    If there were zero regulation that would defy history, and would give us an accurate comparison to a regulated market.
    polaris wrote:
    there are levels of honesty ... sadly tho - it's about as far from that in the US ...

    I'd love to see your list of honest governments. I can't think of one.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    polaris wrote:
    so ... regulation is not the answer? ... really - how have the ceo's and upper management suffered? ... they still have their fat cheques and bonuses ...

    No regulation is definitely necessary. Government can be blamed for creating the environment but they can not be blamed for the actions of the companies.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • mammasan wrote:
    I have to agree. WaMu's fall is solely the upper management's fault. My girlfriend told me that back in 2002 the vast majority of WaMu's mortgages where A paper mortgages. By 2007 the vast majority where B paper. They took a gamble because of greed, they wanted loans with adjustable interest rates so that they could make more money off of them, and it back fired on them. My girlfriend who is a regional manager for them was specifically told by her superiors to encourage the branches in her region to push more adjustable rate mortgages, specially no doc loans. They fucked themselves over.

    You just summed this whole thing up with that statement right there. These greedy choices are what prevented people like me from buying houses. These shitty mortgages pushing up the demand for houses and therefore the prices. I used to laugh at people that bought $300,000 houses for $600 a month. They had no fucking clue what was going on. Smart people who already owned homes took advantage of the fixed rate to refinance to lower their payment as opposed to using their home as an ATM.

    There are so many people that are responsible for this shit show and now everyone has to pay. Sorry to hear about your girlfriend maybe losing her job. The greed of so few effects so many.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me.
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    mammasan wrote:
    No regulation is definitely necessary. Government can be blamed for creating the environment but they can not be blamed for the actions of the companies.

    that's like saying i opened the door to the chicken coup but it's not my fault the fox went in ...
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    jeffbr wrote:
    If there were zero regulation that would defy history, and would give us an accurate comparison to a regulated market.



    I'd love to see your list of honest governments. I can't think of one.

    uhhh ... why would you have to see zero regulation ... you've already seen what happens with limited regulation ...

    norway? sweden? iceland? ... where else have you seen these huge corporate meltdowns?
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    Sorry to hear about your girlfriend maybe losing her job. The greed of so few effects so many.


    Thanks. She is so pissed. Her assistant lost something like $25,000 in her 401k since January. The woman is 58 years old, how is she going to recover that. The absolute greed of these fucking CEOs and CFOs is horrible. No concern for the people who depend on their management decisions. Kerry Killinger who scoffed at a $8.00 per share buyout from Chase over the summer received a $15 million+ golden parachute in September. He is fucking set while people like my girlfriends 58 year old administrative assistant is now fucked. Her retirement account basically savaged.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    polaris wrote:
    that's like saying i opened the door to the chicken coup but it's not my fault the fox went in ...

    A fox cannot deduce right from wrong. It cannot weight the consequences of it's actions. A human being can.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    mammasan wrote:
    A fox cannot deduce right from wrong. It cannot weight the consequences of it's actions. A human being can.

    ok ... so, i left my window open of my car with my $50 on the seat ... if someone takes that money - it's not my fault?
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    polaris wrote:
    ok ... so, i left my window open of my car with my $50 on the seat ... if someone takes that money - it's not my fault?

    It's your fault for leaving your window open but you should not be held responsible for the person who stole your money's action. That individual had a choice to either keep walking or take the money. They made the choice to engage in theft.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    polaris wrote:
    uhhh ... why would you have to see zero regulation ... you've already seen what happens with limited regulation ...

    That is like saying:

    uhhh ... why would you have to see more regulation ... you've already seen what happens with government involvement ...
    polaris wrote:
    norway? sweden? iceland? ... where else have you seen these huge corporate meltdowns?

    So lack of corporate meltdowns is the measure of an honest government? We have had some really honest governments in the US then, until this past year. Even the early lil' Bush years, I guess.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    polaris wrote:
    ok ... so, i left my window open of my car with my $50 on the seat ... if someone takes that money - it's not my fault?

    If a woman wears something you think is "suggestive" and gets raped is it her fault? I would hope people don't think this way, but I have heard people talk like that.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    jeffbr wrote:
    That is like saying:

    uhhh ... why would you have to see more regulation ... you've already seen what happens with government involvement ...



    So lack of corporate meltdowns is the measure of an honest government? We have had some really honest governments in the US then, until this past year. Even the early lil' Bush years, I guess.

    yeah ... and what problems did we encounter with increased regulation?

    no, not necessarily - i'm just saying there are gov'ts that operate with more regulation and you don't see what we're seeing now ...

    what is your solution to preventing this from happening then? ... as we can see this is not the first time this has happened ...
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    mammasan wrote:
    It's your fault for leaving your window open but you should not be held responsible for the person who stole your money's action. That individual had a choice to either keep walking or take the money. They made the choice to engage in theft.

    absolutely ... so, is the solution to leave my door open as well or close my window?
  • KannKann Posts: 1,146
    jeffbr wrote:
    That is like saying:

    uhhh ... why would you have to see more regulation ... you've already seen what happens with government involvement ...
    No regulations at all is an utopia, I'd like to hear how it could be done. And since we need regulations, we might as well make them efficient.
    So lack of corporate meltdowns is the measure of an honest government? We have had some really honest governments in the US then, until this past year. Even the early lil' Bush years, I guess.
    It's true, there are no honest governments, but some are better than others.
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    polaris wrote:
    what is your solution to preventing this from happening then? ... as we can see this is not the first time this has happened ...

    There is no easy, single solution, unfortunately. But I do think that these events will cause boards and shareholders to call for more accountability. I also hope that the safety net goes away, because that is the false sense of security that allowed much of the attitude from these bank execs. They could gamble knowing that the feds would step in and save them.

    Here's an email from Ron Paul's organization this morning:
    Yesterday, Ron Paul sent out a letter warning of the dangers of the Paulson and Bernanke bailout plan and asking you to contact your representatives and senators. A vote on this bill could literally come at any moment, and it is crucial that you immediately express your opinion to Congress.

    The picture painted by the supporters of the bailout is dire. President Bush reinforced this notion in his address to the nation last night and again urged Congress to act immediately.

    Remember what happened the last time the executive branch warned of horrible consequences and rushed legislation through Congress? We got the Patriot Act, which to this day threatens our civil liberties on an unprecedented scale.

    We do know that our economy is in for a rough ride. These bad mortgage-related assets will have to be cleared out and the market will have to reset. The only question is how that will happen.

    The easy way out is to continue the same practices that got us to this point. We can put $700 billion, for starters, in the hands of Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (a former CEO of Goldman Sachs) and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, and let them spend the money on whatever they wish.

    This option will only delay the economic downturn, which will only be worsened.

    Or, we can take this opportunity to end the federal government's interference in the marketplace, truly embrace free market capitalism, and return to a sound monetary system.

    The Federal Reserve's practices of easy credit and monetary inflation have crashed our economy, and now they're asking us to trust them to fix it.

    When you call Congress to express your outrage at the bailout, tell them you want real solutions.

    It is time for Congress to:

    1.) End the Bailouts - Congress must revoke the Federal Reserve's authority to bail out failed businesses at your expense.

    2.) Cut Taxes and Curb Regulation - If we really want to stimulate businesses and revive the market, we need to cut corporate and capital gains taxes, spurring investors to come back to the market and making it easier to attract new workers and clients. It is also time to end failed legislation like Sarbanes-Oxley, which has crippled capital markets, diminished our competitiveness, and greatly harmed small businesses.

    3.) Reduce Spending - We must freeze all non-entitlement spending by the federal government at current levels and eliminate wasteful spending both domestically and in our trillion-dollar overseas budget. Our debt has to come down, and it won't until we start living within our means.

    4.) Reform the Monetary System - If we are to have long-term economic progress, we must end the system of printing money out of thin air. The current laws limiting the circulation of gold and silver-backed currency must be overturned. We can no longer base our money on the empty promises of bureaucrats that it is sound.

    The federal government is trying to scare us into accepting more tyranny. Don't stand for it.

    Check out our action alert, and let Congress know that you will no longer tolerate the Federal Reserve's stranglehold on our economy.


    Best Regards,

    John Tate
    President
    Campaign for Liberty
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    jeffbr wrote:
    There is no easy, single solution, unfortunately. But I do think that these events will cause boards and shareholders to call for more accountability. I also hope that the safety net goes away, because that is the false sense of security that allowed much of the attitude from these bank execs. They could gamble knowing that the feds would step in and save them.

    Here's an email from Ron Paul's organization this morning:

    the thing that gets me is what penalty are the perpetrators receiving? ... are those in upper mgmt allowed to keep their bonuses and fat cheques? ... if so - what's really there to stop this from happening again and again?
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    polaris wrote:
    absolutely ... so, is the solution to leave my door open as well or close my window?

    No the solution is to close and lock both and not leave $50 sitting in your car for all to see. Like I stated the government is responsible. They created the environment by pushing deregulation but the individual companies are responsible for going shit crazy and making bad decisions.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • Can someone tell me what this might mean for the employees of Wamu? Will cutbacks be likely over the next year?
  • Pacomc79Pacomc79 Posts: 9,404
    Can someone tell me what this might mean for the employees of Wamu? Will cutbacks be likely over the next year?


    Yeah, definately. Wamu will likely cease to exist in it's current state over time and just become part of JP Morgan/Chase.

    Positions that are duplicate will almost assuredly be cut once everything shakes out.
    My Girlfriend said to me..."How many guitars do you need?" and I replied...."How many pairs of shoes do you need?" She got really quiet.
  • a recession is the cure i think.
Sign In or Register to comment.