Michigan GOP leader wants Paul barred from future debates

mammasan
mammasan Posts: 5,656
edited May 2007 in A Moving Train
"When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    I'm not too sure I agree with paul on his 9/11 comments, but its definitely wrong to try and silence him. fuck that
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I'm not too sure I agree with paul on his 9/11 comments, but its definitely wrong to try and silence him. fuck that

    If the rest of the party follows suit it will speak volumns about the GOP.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    mammasan wrote:
    If the rest of the party follows suit it will speak volumns about the GOP.

    you mean with trying to silence him?
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    This is sickening.
  • chopitdown
    chopitdown Posts: 2,222
    not surprised at all. He's actually making people re-think some positions.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    jlew24asu wrote:
    you mean with trying to silence him?

    Yes. Regardless of Paul's poor choice of words there is truth to what he said. Our very own 9/11 Commission stated the samething Paul did and I didn't hear all these outcry over it. Why because it was buried in a report that the majority of Americans would never bother to read while Paul's comment was made on national TV in front of an audience of millions.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    mammasan wrote:
    Yes. Regardless of Paul's poor choice of words there is truth to what he said. Our very own 9/11 Commission stated the samething Paul did and I didn't hear all these outcry over it. Why because it was buried in a report that the majority of Americans would never bother to read while Paul's comment was made on national TV in front of an audience of millions.

    I agree.
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    This is sickening.

    It is beyond sickening. The fact that anyone would suggest that someone be censored simply because they disagree with opinion is extremely troubling.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • godpt3
    godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    it's the exact same stunt the democrats pulled w/ Nader in 2000 and 2004
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    godpt3 wrote:
    it's the exact same stunt the democrats pulled w/ Nader in 2000 and 2004

    It's not exactly the same but it was equally as wrong.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • WMA
    WMA Posts: 175
    godpt3 wrote:
    it's the exact same stunt the democrats pulled w/ Nader in 2000 and 2004

    Nader wasn't running as a Democrat was he? I don't think it is similar at all.
  • jrb112476
    jrb112476 Posts: 43
    are we living in nazi germany?
  • robbie
    robbie Posts: 883
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I'm not too sure I agree with paul on his 9/11 comments, but its definitely wrong to try and silence him. fuck that



    COME ON! jlew, we disagree on just about everything, but you ARE NOT STUPID. you cannot deny that the united states policy abroad had something to do with 9/11. it does not excuse what their violent actions, but there was a reason it happened. YOU SIMPLY DO NOT BELIEVE THEY ATTACKED US BECAUSE OF OUR FREEDOM! you know that is rhedoric for those who choose not to think or be informed. dont you think it is dangerous for those who are running for the presidency of the united states to no even attempt to be informed or to understand our enemy? do you really think it is acceptable for presidential frontrunners to be this intentionally ignorant?
  • Rushlimbo
    Rushlimbo Posts: 832
    jrb112476 wrote:
    are we living in nazi germany?

    Yes.
    War is Peace
    Freedom is Slavery
    Ignorance is Strength
  • blackredyellow
    blackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    WMA wrote:
    Nader wasn't running as a Democrat was he? I don't think it is similar at all.

    No, an independent, but the Democrats fought to keep him off of every state ballot and every general election debate.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    robbie wrote:
    COME ON! jlew, we disagree on just about everything, but you ARE NOT STUPID. you cannot deny that the united states policy abroad had something to do with 9/11. it does not excuse what their violent actions, but there was a reason it happened. YOU SIMPLY DO NOT BELIEVE THEY ATTACKED US BECAUSE OF OUR FREEDOM! you know that is rhedoric for those who choose not to think or be informed. dont you think it is dangerous for those who are running for the presidency of the united states to no even attempt to be informed or to understand our enemy? do you really think it is acceptable for presidential frontrunners to be this intentionally ignorant?


    I hear ya robbie. I dont totally disagree. of course its common sense that our policy is the partly reason why were attacked.
  • norm
    norm Posts: 31,146
    thank you mammasan for making my headache worse....i'd like to take a copy of the 1st amendment and baseball bat to this asshole and see if i can change his mind....:mad:
  • RockinInCanada
    RockinInCanada Posts: 2,016
    As a Canadian who respects the American posters here and their views I must say that as an outsider I find this very disturbing.

    It is an unfortunate sign of the times that we are living in.
  • robbie
    robbie Posts: 883
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I hear ya robbie. I dont totally disagree. of course its common sense that our policy is the partly reason why were attacked.


    Ok, so why would Rudy get that ovation when he stated that he had NEVER heard such an outlandish opinion on 9/11? why did he retreat to the spin room and tell sean hannity that we were attacked because of our freedom? should Rudy be the one held up to public ridicule instead of Ron Paul? i just find it astonishing that 6 years after 9/11 the people applying to lead our country in the fight against terrorism have made NO EFFORT to understand the event or our enemy....... he should be publicly mocked, ridiculed, and laughed out of public life forever for this.. along with any Democrat or Independent who is guilty of the same embarrassing negligence.
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    I hear ya robbie. I dont totally disagree. of course its common sense that our policy is the partly reason why were attacked.

    *faints*

    ;)
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde