Repeal the Patriot Act if Barack Obama becomes our next president?

VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
edited October 2008 in A Moving Train
This poll is an attempt to find out people's feeling about the Patriot Act and its relevance if Senator Obama is elected our next president. I'd like to know everyone's opinion.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • prytojprytoj Posts: 536
    don't hold your breath waiting for Obama to repeal the Patriot Act.
  • It will take more votes to repeal than it took to enact.
    the Minions
  • VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
    Sorry about the multiple threads, this thing keeps giving me lip when I try and make it a poll.

    Should the Patriot Act be repealed?

    The poll options were supposed to be:

    1) NO - It is a necessary law to protect us from another terrorist attack.

    2) YES - I would trust this additional power to John McCain, but not to Barack Obama

    3) YES - It is an unconstitutional violation of our civil liberties and our right to privacy.

    4) I don't Care.
  • melodiousmelodious Posts: 1,719
    sounds like one of my old signatures...

    "does your vote get you what you want?
    does it line your coffers?"


    3. repeal the patriot act..... :)


    and remove corporate influence in our political vote.
    all insanity:
    a derivitive of nature.
    nature is god
    god is love
    love is light
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    I don't really care one way or the other. I don't see much difference in my life whether the Patriot Act is there or not.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    1) for me


    And no, Obama won't be able to repeal it....or pull troops from Iraq.....or lower taxs....

    Just my two cents....not worth much.
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • Sorry about the multiple threads, this thing keeps giving me lip when I try and make it a poll.

    Should the Patriot Act be repealed?

    The poll options were supposed to be:

    1) NO - It is a necessary law to protect us from another terrorist attack.

    2) YES - I would trust this additional power to John McCain, but not to Barack Obama

    3) YES - It is an unconstitutional violation of our civil liberties and our right to privacy.

    4) I don't Care.

    If it's a poll, why is there not an option that is the converse of #2?

    I think it should be adjusted, obviously. There are some things in there that were good, but it seems like they passed the act pretty quickly without really thinking about what they were doing.
    No longer overwhelmed it seems so simple now.
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    This poll is an attempt to find out people's feeling about the Patriot Act and its relevance if Senator Obama is elected our next president. I'd like to know everyone's opinion.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy09UpI60F8

    These folks will be policing the streets. Part of Obama's 'Truth Squad'.

    :D
  • VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
    If it's a poll, why is there not an option that is the converse of #2?

    I think it should be adjusted, obviously. There are some things in there that were good, but it seems like they passed the act pretty quickly without really thinking about what they were doing.

    There is no converse to #2, because the original question asks how would you feel about the Patriot Act if Barack was president.
  • There is no converse to #2, because the original question asks how would you feel about the Patriot Act if Barack was president.

    Gotcha, thanks.
    No longer overwhelmed it seems so simple now.
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    69charger wrote:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy09UpI60F8

    These folks will be policing the streets. Part of Obama's 'Truth Squad'.

    :D
    hmm.. Patriot act vs random footage of Obama youth.

    Almost relevent.



    If Obama could repeal the Patriot act I think he should. Do I think he will? no....
  • VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
    I'm really curious to see whether all the rednecks who think this law is a great idea change their stance on it once Obama gets elected (which, I'm guessing he will). You know, seeing as how they feel that, "Obama's a tuuuurrrrruurrrrist! He PALS AROUND with other turrrrrurrrrists!!! He'll take away my gunnnn, and he'll jail me without a trial! Cuz he hates Amurrrrica!"

    I'm not calling everyone who is in favor of the Patriot Act a redneck, either. I've just found that the more I talk to people, the more I find this to be true for this particular group of people.
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    #3, Totally unconstitutional quickly enacted to continue the atmosphere of FEAR and intimidation. If there's any dissent you could end up at Guantanamo

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 30,488
    Even the name, "Patriot Act," was just more of Bush's bullshit. :mad:
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    He probably won't repeal it entirely...he voted for a more restricted version of it in 2006 that got rid of some of the more odious aspects, but kept alot of it as well. McCain voted for it to remain exactly as it was created post-9/11. I'm not sure which one of those eventually passed.
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    3.
  • iamicaiamica Chicago Posts: 2,628
    We should repeal it, but I don't think Obama will do it.
    Chicago 2000 : Chicago 2003 : Chicago 2006 : Summerfest 2006 : Lollapalooza 2007 : Chicago 2009 : Noblesville (Indy) 2010 : PJ20 (East Troy) 2011 : Wrigley Field 2013 : Milwaukee (Yield) 2014 : Wrigley Field 2016
  • VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
    iamica wrote:
    We should repeal it, but I don't think Obama will do it.

    I agree. I doubt he will do anything about it. However, I'm starting to think that there may be a huge spike in the numbers of people against this law if Obama gets elected. I'm talking about the gun-toting, flag-waving, rock-the-cross-on-my-sleeve (even though I refuse to practice any of the fundamental beliefs of Christianity, such as loving thy neighbor or turning the other cheek) rednecks. Yes, these people may actually hate this law if it is in the hands of anybody other than the most supreme turrrrrrurrist fighting cowboy, George W., or some other "Maverick."

    Anybody else feel that this group of people may actually be the key to overturning that law?
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    Imagine the statement he could make by being inaugurated and going right after the PatRIOT ACT. He would give a lot of people reason to at least consider that he may be credible for some of his "change" rhetoric. (then he should next end the war on drugs).

    Politically, this would be an outstanding move (not to mention the right move).

    But I agree with the predominance of this thread that if elected (and as my sig has said since McCain's nomination, I really doubt he will), he won't do it. He'll just leave well enough alone.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
    I agree. I doubt he will do anything about it. However, I'm starting to think that there may be a huge spike in the numbers of people against this law if Obama gets elected. I'm talking about the gun-toting, flag-waving, rock-the-cross-on-my-sleeve (even though I refuse to practice any of the fundamental beliefs of Christianity, such as loving thy neighbor or turning the other cheek) rednecks. Yes, these people may actually hate this law if it is in the hands of anybody other than the most supreme turrrrrrurrist fighting cowboy, George W., or some other "Maverick." I mean, if these people really believe that Obama "pals around with terrorists," then are we giving our next president "OSAMA, UHH, I MEAN OBAMA," THE ARAB MUSLIM EXTREMIST, the power to declare martial law, suspend habeus corpus, wiretap phone conversations, etc...?

    Anybody else feel that this group of people may actually be the key to overturning that law?
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059

    Anybody else feel that this group of people may actually be the key to overturning that law?

    I guess it depends on how deep the fear of Obama being a terrorist and lukewarm on America are. If it's just a bunch of lame rhetoric being used to try to frighten people into voting for McCain, then even if Obama wins, they'll go back to thinking that the Patriot Act is key to protecting us from terror. But if the things I am hearing really are legit fear that Obama's gonna get into office and work to destroy America, then yeah, they may say "I don't want that Muslim terrorist invading my privacy." (though they trusted Bush to do it).

    My gut says "no." I don't see the PA believers doing a 180 because of Obama.

    It's all moot, as McCain's gonna win.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • Urban HikerUrban Hiker Posts: 1,312
    He won't and he'll tell the mass of supporters that he can't because it would risk his chances in the 2012 election - at least in so many words. :rolleyes:
    Walking can be a real trip
    ***********************
    "We've laid the groundwork. It's like planting the seeds. And next year, it's spring." - Nader
    ***********************
    Prepare for tending to your garden, America.
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    He won't and he'll tell the mass of supporters that he can't because it would risk his chances in the 2012 election - at least in so many words. :rolleyes:
    Man would THAT be a lame excuse. That's another reason to go after it right away. Even if it pisses people off, you have four years to win them back.

    Actually, I'd be really curious about his excuse.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    #3 for me no matter who becomes pres.

    And Obama will not repeal the act. He voted for its extension. He's part of the problem.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    It's all moot, as McCain's gonna win.

    You really think so? Legally?
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    You really think so? Legally?
    I said he's gonna win. I did not say legally ;)

    I have almost wavered of late, but I think we're going to learn about race and the Dems on Nov 4. We'll see.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • I agree. I doubt he will do anything about it. However, I'm starting to think that there may be a huge spike in the numbers of people against this law if Obama gets elected. I'm talking about the gun-toting, flag-waving, rock-the-cross-on-my-sleeve (even though I refuse to practice any of the fundamental beliefs of Christianity, such as loving thy neighbor or turning the other cheek) rednecks. Yes, these people may actually hate this law if it is in the hands of anybody other than the most supreme turrrrrrurrist fighting cowboy, George W., or some other "Maverick."

    Anybody else feel that this group of people may actually be the key to overturning that law?

    That's an interesting look at it. Although I'm afraid the type of people you speak of would not be that informed to be worried about it. Unless Rush or Hannity tells them to be.

    It definitely needs to be amended though.
    No longer overwhelmed it seems so simple now.
  • VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
    That's an interesting look at it. Although I'm afraid the type of people you speak of would not be that informed to be worried about it. Unless Rush or Hannity tells them to be.

    It definitely needs to be amended though.

    Exactly-- without a doubt, a few of these blowhards will start singing a different tune under an Obama presidency, and all of their listeners will follow. Nobody pays attention to when laws are passed, and who voted for them anyway-- it's just whoever screams the loudest, and smears their opponents the hardest.
  • VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
    A question to those who think we need the Patriot Act... Why can't we just get warrants to search people that we are truly suspicious of? Even if it was inconceivable to us that we could suffer such an awful attack on September 11th, we learned one thing afterwards-- that it WAS possible. We knew who did it. They admitted to doing it almost immediately after, right? Why didn't we just be slightly more liberal about dealing out warrants to watch people who may have had some connections to Al Queda? If you were best friends with Osama Bin Laden's second cousin, it might be a bit of a stretch to investigate you--but maybe not totally unreasonable? Of course there is always some degree of gray area.

    So, even in 2001, we were talking about a few thousand people that really wanted to destroy us, at most (however, continual poor decisions in our foreign policy may have caused that number to grow)... Why create blanket legislation that allows our government to spy on MILLIONS? If you have to worry about MILLIONS of citizens taking you down, it's time to re-evaluate how you look at the world, and how you operate.

    What real advantage has the Patriot Act given us over fighting terrorists? I would say none. With a legal search warrant, law enforcement can do just about everything that the Patriot Act allows them to do without needing a warrant. Being able to search more people at a time still costs time, money, and is aggravating for all parties involved. It is essentially fruitless well over 99% of the time, and again, costs all of us money.

    The founders wanted to protect us from unreasonable search and seizure, and they made it their FOURTH BIGGEST PRIORITY. #4 in the Bill of Rights! This isn't the 27th amendment here, this is a fundamental right that belongs to us as citizens of this country.

    So what does it do that is actually advantageous? Allow some judges to sleep late a few days of the week?

    Maybe I'm missing the boat here, so please tell me.
Sign In or Register to comment.