in either case, if, as you said, they would be the ones taking advantage of me... even if i were behaving in such a way, wouldnt i be the one treated unequally according to your theory? and if your theory is true and these girls are simply nobly bearing the standard of equal treatment of women, then why are you so offended by what im saying? im just treating sex the way they are and they are getting what they want, not taking being taken advantage of.
well see, i never said that. and that is not my theory. and this is exactly what i'm talking about.
i posed the original question only to try and see what was behind your statements.
if you wanna be a friend of mine
cross the river to the eastside
Somewhat serious question, can I guy take advantage of a girl? If both are willing partners, even if verbal coersion was used, can on epartner take advantage of the other?
“One good thing about music,
when it hits you, you feel to pain.
So brutalize me with music.”
~ Bob Marley
Somewhat serious question, can I guy take advantage of a girl? If both are willing partners, even if verbal coersion was used, can on epartner take advantage of the other?
I believe definitely so. Remember that the guy is 100% accountable for his actions. So if he sees that the girl is drunk and that he might be able to get something she would not normally give and goes for that, I see he is taking advantage, because his intention is to take advantage.
At the same time, the girl is responsible, in this example, for getting drunk and for partaking of risky behaviour.
I don't see that one person is at blame for the situation as a whole being bad. I see they both contribute. But I see that within the individual context they are held to responsibility and natural law by life. And there is no dodging that accountability. Intent plays a big role. For example, the girl might be drunk trying to numb out her family problems at home, and her intent is then very different than the guy's intent.
"The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
well see, i never said that. and that is not my theory. and this is exactly what i'm talking about.
i posed the original question only to try and see what was behind your statements.
then you got your answer and now im posing you a question... what dyou make of the article and this kind of behavior? im curious if this is what the feminist movement envisioned sexual liberation and equal treatment to be... but somehow i suspect that meaningless public sex shows to secure the temporary attention of men was not what they had in mind.
and no, maybe you didnt say it, but the way the question was phrased i can hardly be blamed from thinking it was implied. it reads like a pretty loaded question.
any emotional issues i had had more to do with lack of sex than anything else. nailing a few hot girls can do wonders for a guy's confidence. so sleeping with a few girls who are giving it away might have done my self-esteem more good than bad.
This is something I completely agree with. My self esteem got far stronger after the first couple of casual encounters I had in college. Before that breakthrough I was too shy to even realise that occasionally women were interested in me, let alone pursue the girls that I was interested in.
It doesn't matter if you're male, female, or confused; black, white, brown, red, green, yellow; gay, lesbian; redneck cop, stoned; ugly; military style, doggy style; fat, rich or poor; vegetarian or cannibal; bum, hippie, virgin; famous or drunk-you're either an asshole or you're not!
Comments
As do I.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
well see, i never said that. and that is not my theory. and this is exactly what i'm talking about.
i posed the original question only to try and see what was behind your statements.
cross the river to the eastside
when it hits you, you feel to pain.
So brutalize me with music.”
~ Bob Marley
At the same time, the girl is responsible, in this example, for getting drunk and for partaking of risky behaviour.
I don't see that one person is at blame for the situation as a whole being bad. I see they both contribute. But I see that within the individual context they are held to responsibility and natural law by life. And there is no dodging that accountability. Intent plays a big role. For example, the girl might be drunk trying to numb out her family problems at home, and her intent is then very different than the guy's intent.
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
then you got your answer and now im posing you a question... what dyou make of the article and this kind of behavior? im curious if this is what the feminist movement envisioned sexual liberation and equal treatment to be... but somehow i suspect that meaningless public sex shows to secure the temporary attention of men was not what they had in mind.
and no, maybe you didnt say it, but the way the question was phrased i can hardly be blamed from thinking it was implied. it reads like a pretty loaded question.
~Ron Burgundy
the girl. cos i swear that normally it doesn't do that... i always rise to the occasion, you've got to believe me!
hehehe, i see a joke in this one
This is something I completely agree with. My self esteem got far stronger after the first couple of casual encounters I had in college. Before that breakthrough I was too shy to even realise that occasionally women were interested in me, let alone pursue the girls that I was interested in.
-C Addison