The end of constitutional democracy

qtegirlqtegirl Posts: 321
edited July 2007 in A Moving Train
Interesting article about the end of constitutional democracy. I'm not sure I agree with all the points, and it almost sounds alarmist. But I can't completely rule out that what the article says not only seems possible, but plausible as well. I hope Paul Craig Roberts is wrong.

****
Impeach Now
Or Face the End of Constitutional Democracy

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

Unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the US could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran.

Bush has put in place all the necessary measures for dictatorship in the form of "executive orders" that are triggered whenever Bush declares a national emergency. Recent statements by Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff, former Republican senator Rick Santorum and others suggest that Americans might expect a series of staged, or false flag, "terrorist" events in the near future.

Many attentive people believe that the reason the Bush administration will not bow to expert advice and public opinion and begin withdrawing US troops from Iraq is that the administration intends to rescue its unpopular position with false flag operations that can be used to expand the war to Iran.

Too much is going wrong for the Bush administration: the failure of its Middle East wars, Republican senators jumping ship, Turkish troops massed on northern Iraq's border poised for an invasion to deal with Kurds, and a majority of Americans favoring the impeachment of Cheney and a near-majority favoring Bush's impeachment. The Bush administration desperately needs dramatic events to scare the American people and the Congress back in line with the militarist-police state that Bush and Cheney have fostered.

William Norman Grigg recently wrote that the GOP is "praying for a terrorist strike" to save the party from electoral wipeout in 2008.
Chertoff, Cheney, the neocon nazis, and Mossad would have no qualms about saving the bacon for the Republicans, who have enabled Bush to start two unjustified wars, with Iran waiting in the wings to be attacked in a third war.

The Bush administration has tried unsuccessfully to resurrect the terrorist fear factor by infiltrating some blowhard groups and encouraging them to talk about staging "terrorist" events. The talk, encouraged by federal agents, resulted in "terrorist" arrests hyped by the media, but even the captive media was unable to scare people with such transparent sting operations.

If the Bush administration wants to continue its wars in the Middle East and to entrench the "unitary executive" at home, it will have to conduct some false flag operations that will both frighten and anger the American people and make them accept Bush's declaration of "national emergency" and the return of the draft. Alternatively, the administration could simply allow any real terrorist plot to proceed without hindrance.

A series of staged or permitted attacks would be spun by the captive media as a vindication of the neoconsevatives' Islamophobic policy, the intention of which is to destroy all Middle Eastern governments that are not American puppet states. Success would give the US control over oil, but the main purpose is to eliminate any resistance to Israel's complete absorption of Palestine into Greater Israel.

Think about it. If another 9/11-type "security failure" were not in the works, why would Homeland Security czar Chertoff go to the trouble of convincing the Chicago Tribune that Americans have become complacent about terrorist threats and that he has "a gut feeling" that America will soon be hit hard?

Why would Republican warmonger Rick Santorum say on the Hugh Hewitt radio show that "between now and November, a lot of things are going to happen, and I believe that by this time next year, the American public's (sic) going to have a very different view of this war."

Throughout its existence the US government has staged incidents that the government then used in behalf of purposes that it could not otherwise have pursued. According to a number of writers, false flag operations have been routinely used by the Israeli state. During the Czarist era in Russia, the secret police would set off bombs in order to arrest those the secret police regarded as troublesome. Hitler was a dramatic orchestrator of false flag operations. False flag operations are a commonplace tool of governments.

Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?

Only a diehard minority believes in the honesty and integrity of the Bush-Cheney administration and in the truthfulness of the corporate media.

Hitler, who never achieved majority support in a German election, used the Reichstag fire to fan hysteria and push through the Enabling Act, which made him dictator. Determined tyrants never require majority support in order to overthrow constitutional orders.

The American constitutional system is near to being overthrown. Are coming "terrorist" events of which Chertoff warns and Santorum promises the means for overthrowing our constitutional democracy?
******
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.He can be reached at: PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • I think the article is more accurate than alarmist.

    They have essentially killed the constitution.

    The framework for a living hell on earth is trying to establish itself.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    I do agree about the false flag bullshit that is going on now... Right around the time the report of the Iraq gov't failing to meet any benchmarks comes out, Chertoff is out there fear mongering, saying that he has a hunch that an attack is coming... talk about desperate... at least past attempts came as the form of arrests or taking down some end of the world terrorist plot that later was shown as a few nutjobs who couldn't put a plan together if their lives depended on it.

    It is scary of all that this administration has done to damage our country in the past 7 years, and it's even scarier of what they can do in the last year when it will be too late to be held to any accountability.

    The republican party will loose in a landslide across the board if the status quo continues until the '08 election, they either have to flip-flop on their positions, or hope for another terrorist strike.

    For a long time I couldn't figure out why any elected republican wouldn't do all they can to distance themselves from Bush, but in the ended figured out that it came down to money. The same people that Bush is making rich will be the ones to contribute to the next republican candidate.

    It has become blatantly obvious that this administration couldn't care less about defeating terrorism, but instead keeping us engaged in a made up "war" against it.... kind of like pharmaceutical companies - there is much more to be made from ongoing "treatments" than there ever would be for a cure.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • Eliot RosewaterEliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    I think the article is more accurate than alarmist.

    They have essentially killed the constitution.

    The framework for a living hell on earth is trying to establish itself.
    I agree. It seems pretty accurate to me, and we've got every reason in the world to be alarmed.
  • Royals32Royals32 Posts: 160
    So, let's say one of these false flag attacks happens on Feb 31 (I know, I know, but the last thing I need is to pick a real date and be right and end up in Guantanamo as a co-conspirator). There will be a few people asying "see, I knew it" and then the 9/11 stuff happens all over again where anybody who claims that the government knew or was responsible for the "2/31" terrorist attacks will be brushed off and labelled as a conspiracy theory pushing whacko...just like the 9/11 conspiracy theorists. How will it be different? It won't. It worked 6 years ago, and it'll work again. They don't need to convince the people. They just need to be convinced themselves, the more they preach the lie, they more they themselves believe it.

    I don't necessarily believe the US Government would knowingly allow something like 9/11 to happen (especially again), but maybe that's just because I don't want to believe it. On the other hand, can a few dozen people acting independently really be stopped no matter what security measures are in place?
    #==(o )

    You are not your job.
    You are not how much money you have in the bank.
    You are not the car you drive.
    You are not the contents of your wallet.
    You are not your fucking khakis.
  • I hate to say it, but it's what would have to happen for people to get it.

    Germany took a few decades to get their shit straight after Hitler.

    we'll probably get our asses kicked in a war, hit rock bottom, get some perspective, and then...

    we'll get to work.
  • I'm just waiting for the next terrorist incident to happen

    Just waiting to see how they will rewrite a host of new laws that strip away whatever rights we still have left. I'm sure they've already discussed it at length, printed out all the press releases, and are already practicing the speeches.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • qtegirlqtegirl Posts: 321
    I'm just waiting for the next terrorist incident to happen

    Just waiting to see how they will rewrite a host of new laws that strip away whatever rights we still have left. I'm sure they've already discussed it at length, printed out all the press releases, and are already practicing the speeches.
    Not only that... like the article mentions, Bush already signed an executive order that basically lifts the constitution "in case" of a national emergency or disaster.

    Also, I remember ready lots of articles a few months ago about a whole lot of new prison camps being built "in case" of a national emergency. I used to think it was for ilegals, but now I'm not so sure.

    All the signs are there, it's like a puzzle and we just need to connect the dots. Why are they doing this? Why are they doing that? Are those two things connected?
  • qtegirl wrote:
    Not only that... like the article mentions, Bush already signed an executive order that basically lifts the constitution "in case" of a national emergency or disaster.

    Also, I remember ready lots of articles a few months ago about a whole lot of new prison camps being built "in case" of a national emergency. I used to think it was for ilegals, but now I'm not so sure.

    All the signs are there, it's like a puzzle and we just need to connect the dots. Why are they doing this? Why are they doing that? Are those two things connected?

    I was going to say something about all the new supposed detention camps popping up all over the US (world?). It's as though they are EXPECTING something to to happen so they will be needed. They are not just going to build them for the hell of it. There is a purpose for them! Why don't people know more about them?

    Our rights as people, rights to live as human beings, are being demolished one after the other. Every aspect of your life will be scrutinized and controlled if this goes through.

    You mention constitution lifting mentality and it's all right there.

    Why the hell do they need to destroy the US constitution to go after another country to fight terrorism???....(read again and let that sink in for a bit).

    Other countries doesn't even follow the constitution. It's not even theirs to follow!?!? HELLO?!

    They are doing it so they can use it INTERNALLY on Americans....against Americans.

    Not only that, they want to erase the borders and do it to Canada and Mexico as well!!! The fucking nerve!

    They are trying to abolish everyone rights in North America!!

    What a fucking disaster.

    Someone tell me I'm wrong...someone.....please!
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
Sign In or Register to comment.