Why aren't these people paying taxes?

2»

Comments

  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    hippiemom wrote:
    Other groups that receive government funding are subject to licensing requirements, they have to file financial disclosure statements, they have to abide by all state and federal laws. I have a huge problem granting public funds to any group that doesn't work under the same rules as the rest of us.


    So do I. Im a republican remember? A real one. I HATE giving money to anyone who doesnt deserve it. Ive been to the vatican, and many non-catholic churches as well. One thing I've never been struck by was how hurting financially any of those institutions are. They don't need my money any more than anyone else getting handouts. I wont argue with you on this one. :)
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    So do I. Im a republican remember? A real one. I HATE giving money to anyone who doesnt deserve it. Ive been to the vatican, and many non-catholic churches as well. One thing I've never been struck by was how hurting financially any of those institutions are. They don't need my money any more than anyone else getting handouts. I wont argue with you on this one. :)
    Suddenly I feel a wee bit uncomfortable .... here I am on the same side with PaperPlates, and Pastor Ernie of the Church of the Lunatic Fringe.

    How did this happen???

    :D
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Those values you scorn so much ARE part of 'saving souls'. At least as I understand it.

    "On the other hand, I don't want our government regulating religion since I am a firm believer in the Constitution and Bill of Rights that grants each and every one of us the freedom to choose (or not choose) a religion to believe in."

    I couldnt agree more. See, we're not so different. ;)
    ...
    Scorn? I just don't believe that these 'Values' they preach are the values they abide to. Whose Family came up with these Universal Values? Falwell? Robertson? Phelps?
    Let me follow my own moral compass... I don't need someone dictating which morals I'm supposed to possess.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    hippiemom wrote:
    Suddenly I feel a wee bit uncomfortable .... here I am on the same side with PaperPlates, and Pastor Ernie of the Church of the Lunatic Fringe.

    How did this happen???

    :D

    Crazier things have happened. I mean, they gave flavor flav a freegin tv show ffs, anything can happen. ;)
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    Scorn? I just don't believe that these 'Values' they preach are the values they abide to. Whose Family came up with these Universal Values? Falwell? Robertson? Phelps?
    Let me follow my own moral compass... I don't need someone dictating which morals I'm supposed to possess.


    He said dic-tating. ;)
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,513
    I am a CPA, and I just saw a client's closing stmt for a home he bought. The county in which he bought the house charges a "transfer tax" (as most counties do) on the purchase, however, said taxes are called a "Theatre Restoration Tax", which go to refurbishing a local theatre.

    I am a hardcore democrat, but this sort of tax goes a bit too far!

    On the bright side, the tax is based on the value of the home, so the richer the person, the more thay pay for the theatre restoration! (that appeals to the democrat in me!)
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    He said dic-tating. ;)
    ...
    Dick... the perfect description of people who want America to become more of a theocracy, fusing 'God's Law' with our laws.
    And please, don't take this as some sort of theoretical conspiracy against Christianity or Christians... if the Jews or the Muslims or Johovah's Witnesses were doing the same thing... I'd be presenting the very same arguements. I do not want ANY religious beliefs to direct legislation in this country.
    Personally... I can't help it if the Christians apparently need constant reminders of what the Ten Commandments are... I don't want my tax dollars going towards things to remind them of what they are supposed to do. I suggest they memorize all 10 of them and try to live by them... if they are so important to them.
    Also... there is no War On Christmas. That is a conspiracy theory. It's all about money. Getting Jewish dollars and Muslim dollars and Buddhist dollars from 26-November to 02-January. That's all. There is no law on the books outlawing 'Silent Night', contrary of what Bill O'Rielly tells you.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • dkst0426dkst0426 Posts: 523
    Cosmo wrote:
    There is no law on the books outlawing 'Silent Night', contrary of what Bill O'Rielly tells you.

    Actually, that's what the Christians who choose to speak up are trying to remind groups like the ACLU of.
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    Dick... the perfect description of people who want America to become more of a theocracy, fusing 'God's Law' with our laws.
    And please, don't take this as some sort of theoretical conspiracy against Christianity or Christians... if the Jews or the Muslims or Johovah's Witnesses were doing the same thing... I'd be presenting the very same arguements. I do not want ANY religious beliefs to direct legislation in this country.
    Personally... I can't help it if the Christians apparently need constant reminders of what the Ten Commandments are... I don't want my tax dollars going towards things to remind them of what they are supposed to do. I suggest they memorize all 10 of them and try to live by them... if they are so important to them.
    Also... there is no War On Christmas. That is a conspiracy theory. It's all about money. Getting Jewish dollars and Muslim dollars and Buddhist dollars from 26-November to 02-January. That's all. There is no law on the books outlawing 'Silent Night', contrary of what Bill O'Rielly tells you.

    Yea that is strange, I know all ten commandments and I'm an atheist. Apparently believing in god means you have a short memory.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Yea that is strange, I know all ten commandments and I'm an atheist. Apparently believing in god means you have a short memory.


    and apparently being an atheist gives you the right to generalize like it was your job.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    and apparently being an atheist gives you the right to generalize like it was your job.

    Cool, I didn't know that :)
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    dkst0426 wrote:
    Actually, that's what the Christians who choose to speak up are trying to remind groups like the ACLU of.
    ...
    If you are talking about little kids singing 'Silent Night' at the Public School's Christmas Program... then, the ACLU is right. You want to hear your fucking kid sing 'Silent Night'? Put him in your church's Christmas Program. I don't think it's fair to make the little Jewish kid sing it, just as I wouldn't want to force your kid to recite that Chanukah Chant (sorry, I'm not up on my Jewish traditions). Let them sing 'Jingle Bells' and 'Ho, Ho, Ho' and all that crap... Quit crying about petty bullshit, it's fucking Christmas, fer cripes sake.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • dkst0426dkst0426 Posts: 523
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    If you are talking about little kids singing 'Silent Night' at the Public School's Christmas Program... then, the ACLU is right. You want to hear your fucking kid sing 'Silent Night'? Put him in your church's Christmas Program. I don't think it's fair to make the little Jewish kid sing it, just as I wouldn't want to force your kid to recite that Chanukah Chant (sorry, I'm not up on my Jewish traditions). Let them sing 'Jingle Bells' and 'Ho, Ho, Ho' and all that crap... Quit crying about petty bullshit, it's fucking Christmas, fer cripes sake.
    Whatever did I say to garner a profanity-laced response like that? And this was supposed to be a rational discussion?
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    If you are talking about little kids singing 'Silent Night' at the Public School's Christmas Program... then, the ACLU is right. You want to hear your fucking kid sing 'Silent Night'? Put him in your church's Christmas Program. I don't think it's fair to make the little Jewish kid sing it, just as I wouldn't want to force your kid to recite that Chanukah Chant (sorry, I'm not up on my Jewish traditions). Let them sing 'Jingle Bells' and 'Ho, Ho, Ho' and all that crap... Quit crying about petty bullshit, it's fucking Christmas, fer cripes sake.

    That's why I don't sing the Canadian National Anthem, because it says God in it.

    O Canada! Our home and native land!
    True patriot love in all thy sons command.
    With glowing hearts we see thee rise,
    The True North strong and free!
    From far and wide, O Canada,
    We stand on guard for thee.
    God keep our land glorious and free!
    O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
    O Canada, we stand on guard for thee

    Fuck it pisses me off.

    And the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    "Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:"
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    dkst0426 wrote:
    Whatever did I say to garner a profanity-laced response like that? And this was supposed to be a rational discussion?
    ...
    I like the word, "FUCK".
    ...
    Then, I went over it again and i used it twice. I guess 'laced' is a synomym for 'twice'.
    Unless, 'bullshit' is a profanity.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    Today is the last in the series of articles at the NYT, this one focusing on benefits to clergy such as housing exemptions and the ability to opt out of Social Security, religious organizations not having to pay into state unemployment funds, and sales tax exemptions on religious materials.

    Sales tax, property tax, unemployment tax, and a myriad of other exemptions, all adds up to billions of dollars in tax liability that you and I have to pick up. Churches attempt to justify it by talking about the good that they do in society, and some of them unquestionably do quite a bit of good. But so do secular food banks, homeless shelters, counseling centers, free clinics, not to mention poorly paid inner city teachers, social workers, day care workers ... none of whom have any of these tax advantages available to them.

    I'm sure there are other republicans besides PaperPlates who aren't thrilled about this either. If you want to open a day care center, or build an upscale retirement community, do you want to have to compete against an organization that's exempt from costly regulations that you have to follow, and that gets a big boost in profit margin simply because they pay little or no tax?

    Religion-Based Tax Breaks: Housing to Paychecks to Books
    By DIANA B. HENRIQUES
    Published: October 11, 2006

    For tens of millions of Americans, the Rev. Rick Warren is best known for his blockbuster spiritual guide, “The Purpose Driven Life,” which has sold more than 25 million copies; his success as the founder of the 22,000-member Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, Calif.; and his efforts on behalf of some of the world’s neediest people.

    But for tens of thousands of ministers — and their financial advisers — Pastor Warren will also be remembered as their champion in a fight over the most valuable tax break available to ordained clergy members of all faiths: an exemption from federal taxes for most of the money they spend on housing, which typically represents roughly a third of their compensation. Pastor Warren argued that the tax break is essential to poorly paid clergy members who serve society.

    The tax break is not available to the staff at secular nonprofit organizations whose scale and charitable aims compare to those of religious ministries like Pastor Warren’s church, or to poorly paid inner-city teachers and day care workers who also serve their communities.

    The housing deduction is one of several tax breaks that leave extra money in the pockets of clergy members and their religious employers. Ministers of every faith are also exempt from income tax withholding and can opt out of Social Security. And every state but one exempts religious employers from paying state unemployment taxes — reducing the employers’ payroll expenses but also leaving their workers without unemployment benefits if they are laid off.

    Another religion-based tax break — the only one consistently defeated in the courts in recent years — is an exemption from state sales taxes for religious publications but not for secular ones.

    This sales tax break has been struck down as unconstitutional in at least five states, most recently in Georgia in February, when a United States District Court judge, Richard W. Story, ruled that “the unique and preferential treatment the state provides to ‘religious’ literature raises serious constitutional concerns” under the First Amendment clause prohibiting an “establishment” of religion.

    Yet a few states still have a sales tax exemption for religious publications. One of them is Florida, where state officials, lawyers for two religious publications and a national religious liberty advocacy group have joined forces to defend the tax break from a constitutional challenge waged almost single-handedly by an Orlando lawyer named Heather Morcroft.

    Ms. Morcroft is a Legal Aid staff lawyer who works with foster children. She is a believer in Wicca, which she described as a neo-pagan faith loosely based on the traditions of ancient earth-centered religions, and serves as president of the state’s small Wiccan Religious Cooperative.

    The cooperative is the formal plaintiff in the pending lawsuit Ms. Morcroft filed almost five years ago to challenge the constitutionality of the Florida exemption. Her arguments echo those that have prevailed in other states: that by exempting religious publications from the sales tax, the government is favoring religious ideas over secular ones, and that tax officials should not be in the business of deciding what publications are sufficiently religious to be exempt.

    In contrast to Ms. Morcroft’s lonely fight in Tallahassee, Pastor Warren, who declined to be interviewed for this article, had a host of allies when he went to battle to defend the special tax deduction for housing expenses of clergy members. Ultimately, the allies included both houses of Congress and the president of the United States.

    The Housing Exemption

    The one small passage in the vast federal tax code that originally conferred the housing-expense exemption on clergy members did not cap the deduction. But in 1971, the Internal Revenue Service limited it to the “fair market rental value” of the furnished home, utilities included.

    During a routine audit in 1996, according to court documents, the I.R.S. decided that Pastor Warren’s housing deduction exceeded the rental value of his new home on Via Del Sol in the rugged Trabuco Canyon, southeast of Los Angeles.

    That’s when the fireworks began.

    Pastor Warren, who gives 90 percent of his considerable income to charities, later explained in an open letter to other ministers that he decided to sue because the housing allowance was the only way small churches could pay their pastors enough to live — and he knew that those ministers could not fight the I.R.S. as he could.

    The deduction, usually called the parsonage exemption, is available to ministers, rabbis and other clergy members of all faiths working at houses of worship. It allows them to live in congregation-owned housing without being taxed on the imputed value of their free housing, as almost all other employees are when they live in company-paid housing.

    (continued here)
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
Sign In or Register to comment.