why wont Obama call McCain's bluff?

robbierobbie Posts: 883
edited August 2008 in A Moving Train
the big problem most people do not understand is that if McCain gets his way and leases our waters and our wildlife refuses to EXXON, they are not going to sell that oil to the american people, they are going to sell it on the world market, for as much profit as they can possibly make, this does nothing to make us energy independent, McCain makes it sound like if we drill for oil it will stay in the states... If Obama would come out and say they can drill wherever they want BUT not EXXON, the United States would drill the oil and sell the oil to the American people only.....Using ALL profits to invest in wind, solar, and other energy independent technology. this would force McCain into the position of defending selling our oil to China and India.... We all know this would never be agreed upon, the republicans would attempt to defend "free trade" and ridicule Obama for attempting to use American oil in America.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • raszputiniraszputini Posts: 119
    Pretty damn good point. I agree completely. Obama won't however, because the motivation for his position change was simply political.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    robbie wrote:
    the big problem most people do not understand is that if McCain gets his way and leases our waters and our wildlife refuses to EXXON, they are not going to sell that oil to the american people, they are going to sell it on the world market, for as much profit as they can possibly make, this does nothing to make us energy independent, McCain makes it sound like if we drill for oil it will stay in the states... If Obama would come out and say they can drill wherever they want BUT not EXXON, the United States would drill the oil and sell the oil to the American people only.....Using ALL profits to invest in wind, solar, and other energy independent technology. this would force McCain into the position of defending selling our oil to China and India.... We all know this would never be agreed upon, the republicans would attempt to defend "free trade" and ridicule Obama for attempting to use American oil in America.

    So where does McCain say he's going to lease our waters and wildlife refuges to EXXON? I'd like some back-up for that statement.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • robbierobbie Posts: 883
    know1 wrote:
    So where does McCain say he's going to lease our waters and wildlife refuges to EXXON? I'd like some back-up for that statement.


    have you heard anything that has come out of Cotten Hill's mouth? All he talks about is "DRILL HERE DRILL NOW DRILL EVERYTHING" who do you think is going to do that drilling? Oil companies lease land, drill the oil, and sell it on the world market....and YES, that oil will be the property of the oil companies, not the american people, and it WILL be sold on the world market, NOT to the American people. these facts are undisputed.... unreported, but undisputed none the less.
  • cornnifercornnifer Posts: 2,130
    raszputini wrote:
    Pretty damn good point. I agree completely. Obama won't however, because the motivation for his position change was simply political.

    Once again, it isn't a position change. Obama has stated emphatically that it would only be CONSIDERED as part of an extensive, comprehensive, energy reform packages that stresses first and foremost alternative energy sources and conservation. A crapton of Americans favor off shore drilling. An agreement to CONSIDER something many Ameicans favor while sticking to his own guns is not a policy change. It isn't even a promise to do it. It is an agreement to possibly CONSIDER it. Using this to portay Obama as a "flip flopping", pandering, political opprotunist is weak. It isn't even close to an example of that.
    "When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."
  • cornnifercornnifer Posts: 2,130
    robbie wrote:
    have you heard anything that has come out of Cotten Hill's mouth? All he talks about is "DRILL HERE DRILL NOW DRILL EVERYTHING" who do you think is going to do that drilling? Oil companies lease land, drill the oil, and sell it on the world market....and YES, that oil will be the property of the oil companies, not the american people, and it WILL be sold on the world market, NOT to the American people. these facts are undisputed.... unreported, but undisputed none the less.

    pretty hard to dispute something that hasn't been reported yet.
    "When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    It's also simple economics. you think the US has enough money to drill the oil and then keep it in the States? that makes no sense, they'd have to export a lot of it.
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    know1 wrote:
    So where does McCain say he's going to lease our waters and wildlife refuges to EXXON? I'd like some back-up for that statement.
    yeah, I think it's a bit far-fetched to think that the republicans would be acting in the interests of oil companies...
  • robbierobbie Posts: 883
    cornnifer wrote:
    pretty hard to dispute something that hasn't been reported yet.


    the unreported part is that it will be sold on the world market, not to the people of the United States..... although this is not generally reported as part of the drilling issue, it is neverthless a fact. do you dispute this? do you dispute that if Obama were to propose that all american oil stays in America that McCain would satnd up for the rights of the oil companies to sell it for the highest profit as opposed to selling it to the American public at say.....25 dollars a barrel..... you know, the price it was before Bush took office? hell they could still sell it at 120 a barrel and put all profits toward renewable energy. I dont think the American public would be so behind McCains Drilling idea if they knew it was for BIG OIL not the American people... for EXXONS economy, not the American economy.
  • robbierobbie Posts: 883
    _outlaw wrote:
    It's also simple economics. you think the US has enough money to drill the oil and then keep it in the States? that makes no sense, they'd have to export a lot of it.


    what makes no sense is to give the oil companies more land when they already have 68 million acres they are not using, so they can drill more oil to sell to China and India...... what makes LESS sense is that Obama is not informing the American people of these facts. The VAST majority of people that hear Cotton Hill talk about drilling think that american oil will belong to america, not EXXON, not china, Not India.
  • ThecureThecure Posts: 814
    robbie wrote:
    the unreported part is that it will be sold on the world market, not to the people of the United States..... although this is not generally reported as part of the drilling issue, it is neverthless a fact. do you dispute this? do you dispute that if Obama were to propose that all american oil stays in America that McCain would satnd up for the rights of the oil companies to sell it for the highest profit as opposed to selling it to the American public at say.....25 dollars a barrel..... you know, the price it was before Bush took office? hell they could still sell it at 120 a barrel and put all profits toward renewable energy. I dont think the American public would be so behind McCains Drilling idea if they knew it was for BIG OIL not the American people... for EXXONS economy, not the American economy.

    what do you consider a fact? this is yoru opinion which can be right but is pure hear-say. unless you have some facts behind this the tread has no point to it. also, how can you say that it would not help the american ecomomy?
    People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."
    - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)

    If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
    - Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    robbie wrote:
    what makes no sense is to give the oil companies more land when they already have 68 million acres they are not using, so they can drill more oil to sell to China and India...... what makes LESS sense is that Obama is not informing the American people of these facts. The VAST majority of people that hear Cotton Hill talk about drilling think that american oil will belong to america, not EXXON, not china, Not India.
    you know what makes no sense whatsoever... off-shore drilling in general.
  • ThecureThecure Posts: 814
    _outlaw wrote:
    you know what makes no sense whatsoever... off-shore drilling in general.

    why does off-shore drilling not make sense? is it the whole it will take 10 years to get the oil thing?
    People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."
    - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)

    If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
    - Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
  • cornnifercornnifer Posts: 2,130
    robbie wrote:
    the unreported part is that it will be sold on the world market, not to the people of the United States..... although this is not generally reported as part of the drilling issue, it is neverthless a fact. do you dispute this? do you dispute that if Obama were to propose that all american oil stays in America that McCain would satnd up for the rights of the oil companies to sell it for the highest profit as opposed to selling it to the American public at say.....25 dollars a barrel..... you know, the price it was before Bush took office? hell they could still sell it at 120 a barrel and put all profits toward renewable energy. I dont think the American public would be so behind McCains Drilling idea if they knew it was for BIG OIL not the American people... for EXXONS economy, not the American economy.

    All i said is you can't refute something that hasn't been reported. Nor can you state speculation, even one rooted in common sense, as fact.
    Heck, i think you're probably correct about McCain's intentions and probable course of action.
    "When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."
Sign In or Register to comment.