Democrats to cut out all earmarks
blackredyellow
Posts: 5,889
This is a step in the right direction...
Dems to kill thousands of hometown projects
Plan devised to slice the 'pork' out of spending bills
Associated Press Writer
The Associated Press
Updated: 9:46 a.m. ET Dec 12, 2006
WASHINGTON - Democrats taking power in January have settled on a plan to clean up $463 billion worth of GOP budget leftovers, but they're not happy about it - and neither is the White House.
The plan by the incoming chairmen of the House and Senate Appropriations committees would kill thousands of hometown projects, called "earmarks," that lawmakers add to spending bills. Staying within President Bush's thrifty budgets for domestic agencies like the Agriculture and Education departments is part of their proposal.
"There will be no congressional earmarks," Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., and Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., said Monday in a statement announcing their plans, which were endorsed by incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and soon-to-be Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.
Single spending bill planned
Although critics call hometown projects "pork," their sponsors claim that, as elected representatives, they know more about the needs of people in their states than the president and government bureaucrats. Projects they often want funded range from road, bridge and flood-control construction to economic development. Beneficiaries include local governments, hospitals and universities.
Such projects exploded in number under GOP control of Congress over the last 12 years. At the same time they spawned a boom on Washington's K Street lobbying corridor, where consultants earn big fees by helping outsiders navigate the system.
Democrats face a huge bind: having to complete nine unfinished budget bills for the 2007 fiscal year that began Oct. 1 while trying to advance their own agenda.
They say they now plan to offer a single spending bill covering 13 Cabinet departments. The unappealing alternative was a time - and energy - consuming legislative slog just as Bush's new budget and a $100 billion-plus Iraq funding bill are due to arrive on Capitol Hill.
"It is important that we clear the decks quickly so that we can get to work on the American people's priorities, the president's anticipated war funding request and a new budget," Obey and Byrd said in a statement.
White House dissappointed
The bill should encounter little resistance from Republicans and the White House since it will stay within Bush's tight budget limits. Yet the White House risks losing priorities such as increased foreign aid for countries demonstrating a commitment to democracy and free markets and moves to boost America's competitiveness in math and science.
White House Budget Director Rob Portman called the Democrats' announcement disappointing.
"There are still more than nine months remaining in the fiscal year, and we believe we should be working on the remaining bills to achieve the best results possible for the American people," Portman said. He added that the administration wants to "maintain fiscal discipline and avoid gimmicks and unwarranted emergency spending."
The move won applause from a Senate GOP conservative who worked to block Republicans in his own party from passing a huge, pork-laden spending bill in their final days controlling Congress.
"I'm glad the Democrats are taking a time-out on pork-barrel spending," said Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C. "It's refreshing to hear them say they are going to reform the earmarking process to make it transparent and accountable."
Earmark money to be shifted
Congress got a black eye over mandating project-specific appropriations when former Rep. Randy Cunningham, R-Calif., admitted taking $2.4 million in bribes in exchange for earmarking projects to defense contractors. Cunningham, who held seats on the House intelligence and appropriations committees, is now serving an eight-year federal prison sentence.
Obey and Byrd said lawmakers could reapply for home-state projects next year when Congress turns to the fiscal 2008 budget cycle - after reforms of the earmarking process are put in place.
They said some of the money set aside for home-state earmarks will be shifted to programs that Democrats feel have been shortchanged by Bush's budget, such as health research, education and grants to local law enforcement agencies.
Just how much money would be redirected is unclear. Projects such as levees and federal grants to housing and transit authorities will still be funded, but the administration will determine how to spend pools of money that Congress usually divides up, specifying the amounts for particular projects.
Returning authority to the White House to specify which projects get how much money raises the risk of an even more closed process. The administration could use the process to reward allies and punish critics. Veteran appropriations committee members also could lobby over the phone for earmarks even as they leave them out of the upcoming spending bill.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16167853/
Dems to kill thousands of hometown projects
Plan devised to slice the 'pork' out of spending bills
Associated Press Writer
The Associated Press
Updated: 9:46 a.m. ET Dec 12, 2006
WASHINGTON - Democrats taking power in January have settled on a plan to clean up $463 billion worth of GOP budget leftovers, but they're not happy about it - and neither is the White House.
The plan by the incoming chairmen of the House and Senate Appropriations committees would kill thousands of hometown projects, called "earmarks," that lawmakers add to spending bills. Staying within President Bush's thrifty budgets for domestic agencies like the Agriculture and Education departments is part of their proposal.
"There will be no congressional earmarks," Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., and Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., said Monday in a statement announcing their plans, which were endorsed by incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and soon-to-be Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.
Single spending bill planned
Although critics call hometown projects "pork," their sponsors claim that, as elected representatives, they know more about the needs of people in their states than the president and government bureaucrats. Projects they often want funded range from road, bridge and flood-control construction to economic development. Beneficiaries include local governments, hospitals and universities.
Such projects exploded in number under GOP control of Congress over the last 12 years. At the same time they spawned a boom on Washington's K Street lobbying corridor, where consultants earn big fees by helping outsiders navigate the system.
Democrats face a huge bind: having to complete nine unfinished budget bills for the 2007 fiscal year that began Oct. 1 while trying to advance their own agenda.
They say they now plan to offer a single spending bill covering 13 Cabinet departments. The unappealing alternative was a time - and energy - consuming legislative slog just as Bush's new budget and a $100 billion-plus Iraq funding bill are due to arrive on Capitol Hill.
"It is important that we clear the decks quickly so that we can get to work on the American people's priorities, the president's anticipated war funding request and a new budget," Obey and Byrd said in a statement.
White House dissappointed
The bill should encounter little resistance from Republicans and the White House since it will stay within Bush's tight budget limits. Yet the White House risks losing priorities such as increased foreign aid for countries demonstrating a commitment to democracy and free markets and moves to boost America's competitiveness in math and science.
White House Budget Director Rob Portman called the Democrats' announcement disappointing.
"There are still more than nine months remaining in the fiscal year, and we believe we should be working on the remaining bills to achieve the best results possible for the American people," Portman said. He added that the administration wants to "maintain fiscal discipline and avoid gimmicks and unwarranted emergency spending."
The move won applause from a Senate GOP conservative who worked to block Republicans in his own party from passing a huge, pork-laden spending bill in their final days controlling Congress.
"I'm glad the Democrats are taking a time-out on pork-barrel spending," said Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C. "It's refreshing to hear them say they are going to reform the earmarking process to make it transparent and accountable."
Earmark money to be shifted
Congress got a black eye over mandating project-specific appropriations when former Rep. Randy Cunningham, R-Calif., admitted taking $2.4 million in bribes in exchange for earmarking projects to defense contractors. Cunningham, who held seats on the House intelligence and appropriations committees, is now serving an eight-year federal prison sentence.
Obey and Byrd said lawmakers could reapply for home-state projects next year when Congress turns to the fiscal 2008 budget cycle - after reforms of the earmarking process are put in place.
They said some of the money set aside for home-state earmarks will be shifted to programs that Democrats feel have been shortchanged by Bush's budget, such as health research, education and grants to local law enforcement agencies.
Just how much money would be redirected is unclear. Projects such as levees and federal grants to housing and transit authorities will still be funded, but the administration will determine how to spend pools of money that Congress usually divides up, specifying the amounts for particular projects.
Returning authority to the White House to specify which projects get how much money raises the risk of an even more closed process. The administration could use the process to reward allies and punish critics. Veteran appropriations committee members also could lobby over the phone for earmarks even as they leave them out of the upcoming spending bill.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16167853/
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Sigh........meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Give me my fucking money back, for Christ's sake.
we've got too much debt to be cutting taxes just yet. rein in our spending, pay some of that off. then we'll talk about cutting taxes. this is a positive sign, even if it's not a perfect one.
Hometown issues should be addressed by the state government: its governor and the state legislature. Items that state need federal funds should be address at a separate office and specific bills for specific projects at each state should be addressed as such.
I don't think it's the job of the state's federal congresspeople to address a road improvement project within just one state, or items like that.
Simply transferring money from one bs project to another does nothing to "rein in our spending".
It would be a positive sign if the earmarks were trashed and the money returned. That would show some fiscal responsibility. Waste is waste.
cmon now... read carefully... you'll see the word "some" in there. that implies some will be diverted, some is just going to be cut. im no mathemetician, but that sounds like a decrease in spending to me. that's a good thing. it's a start.
you cant simply turn around and hand all the money back becos most americans want to fund the services they are redirecting that money to. it's the peril of a democracy, you dont always get your way
"Just how much money would be redirected is unclear."
In Washington spending terms "how much...unclear" tends to equate to "all". But yes, it could possibly be a start.
Then lets devote 100% of taxes to paying off the debt. When it's done, we start over. I'm cool with that.
Stop by:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=14678777351&ref=mf
Well if it doesn't happen the Democrats have no one to blame but themselves.
I'd like to see the money from that go into rebuilding NOLA and other areas destroyed by Katrina. I have friends there who just got out of their FEMA trailor last week :(
I don't view that as regional or home town programs. I view them as American programs. The general consensus of my friend is that many have simply been forgotten down there, but I think it's that there's not enough money to fix it.
old music: http://www.myspace.com/slowloader
im trying to be optimistic
but we agree then. now let's get it done!
Here's a partial list fromt he Citizen's Against Government Waste website ( http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pagename=news_byrddroppings ):
And
http://www.porkbusters.org gave him their Lifetime Acheivement Award in their Hall of Shame.