:) They will subpeona Rove and Others

AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
edited March 2007 in A Moving Train
George doesn't like that thought
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • JaneNYJaneNY Posts: 4,438
    Good. I want to know why PATRICK FITZGERALD was in the 3rd ranked group of attorneys, rated as *mediocre* for goodness sake. I hope someone gets to ask that.
    R.i.p. Rigoberto Alpizar.
    R.i.p. My Dad - May 28, 2007
    R.i.p. Black Tail (cat) - Sept. 20, 2008
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    JaneNY wrote:
    Good. I want to know why PATRICK FITZGERALD was in the 3rd ranked group of attorneys, rated as *mediocre* for goodness sake. I hope someone gets to ask that.

    He wasn't very "pleasurable."

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    ...and nothing will come of it except a waste of time and money.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    know1 wrote:
    ...and nothing will come of it except a waste of time and money.

    Very ture. Wait until one of them has sex with an intern.

    (Seriously. It is a waste of money. Don't bother)
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • RushlimboRushlimbo Posts: 832
    know1 wrote:
    ...and nothing will come of it except a waste of time and money.

    Trying to get truth is never a waste of time.
    War is Peace
    Freedom is Slavery
    Ignorance is Strength
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    Very ture. Wait until one of them has sex with an intern.

    (Seriously. It is a waste of money. Don't bother)

    I wasn't defending anybody, just professing how tired I am of the waste of politics.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    know1 wrote:
    I wasn't defending anybody, just professing how tired I am of the waste of politics.

    Me, too.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • hailhailkchailhailkc Posts: 582
    Rushlimbo wrote:
    Trying to get truth is never a waste of time.

    Except when it comes to investigating a President who cheated on his wife with an intern in the Oval Office…
    MOSSAD NATO Alphabet Stations (E10)
    High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
    Low Traffic CIO MIW
    Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
  • AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    know1 wrote:
    ...and nothing will come of it except a waste of time and money.

    I don't know - Rove and the President have been lying for quite a long time.. maybe something will accidently fall out -
  • JaneNYJaneNY Posts: 4,438
    gue_barium wrote:
    He wasn't very "pleasurable."

    lol. (Saw the other thread) He wouldn't be either - I listened to a whole hour about him on npr once when I was putting together furniture. He sleeps at his office and keeps shirts there. I got the impression he's a total workaholic. Which is good if he's working for the good guys.

    I hope some of this gets on cspan. I like watching a good shakeup in progress.
    R.i.p. Rigoberto Alpizar.
    R.i.p. My Dad - May 28, 2007
    R.i.p. Black Tail (cat) - Sept. 20, 2008
  • puremagicpuremagic Posts: 1,907
    know1 wrote:
    ...and nothing will come of it except a waste of time and money.

    Only if we let it. So what if we don't find out any thing new. The bigger picture is accountability. Congress is the only branch of government that the Executive Branch is accountable to. Yes, the Executive Branch has alot of headway in wartime, however, the matter of the U.S. Attorney issue is not a wartime issue. The issue not about the fired U.S. Attorneys, Bush and Cheney don't give a damn about that issue. The real fight is the removal of the only road block to absolute Executive Branch power, Congress and the preservation of the "check and balance" system under our Constitution. You have only a small taste of what the Executive Branch can do without oversight, without checks and balance, without accountability.

    Bush DID NOT APPOINT these Senators and Representatives. You "elected" the people in the House and Senate. They are on equal footing. They are banking on our continued liberal/conservative bullshit to make this a non-issue, and we will because we have all reached the point that 2008 can't get here fast enough. The result of our indifference will be a one branch government with no checks and balances.

    Just keep in mind that appointees and aids to the President and Vice-president are not privileged over Congress. They are nothing more than a "privileged family friend or pocketbook" hired as a federal employee, under a special pay scale and hiring procedures to a "public service" job. They carry no executive privilege from which Congress is excluded. Karl and Gonazles are appointed government workers. Just like the President could replace the appointed official who heads the Department of Energy at any time so goes Gonazles. Aids and appointees hold disposal politically obtained positions so how privilege are they compared to your rights.
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • RushlimboRushlimbo Posts: 832
    hailhailkc wrote:
    Except when it comes to investigating a President who cheated on his wife with an intern in the Oval Office…

    Exactly. I mean...ah, you tricked me.
    War is Peace
    Freedom is Slavery
    Ignorance is Strength
  • RainDogRainDog Posts: 1,824
    hailhailkc wrote:
    Except when it comes to investigating a President who cheated on his wife with an intern in the Oval Office…
    You know, I think I may have finally come around to the right's position on this one. Asking someone about something that's not illegal, getting them to lie about it under oath, and then nailling them on it......

    ... is fun. Really fun. I can't wait to see more of this.

    Might have been eight years coming, but let this be a lesson to the Republicans. Never try to out-lawyer the Lawyer Party.
  • floyd1975floyd1975 Posts: 1,350
    Rushlimbo wrote:
    Trying to get truth is never a waste of time.

    But witch hunts always are. Congressional hearings are never about getting to the truth. They are always about grandstanding.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    This is a gigantic waste of time and money but I think every damn Republican should shut the fuck up because I'm sure most where in full support of the Clinton investigation.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    mammasan wrote:
    This is a gigantic waste of time and money but I think every damn Republican should shut the fuck up because I'm sure most where in full support of the Clinton investigation.


    Help me understaind.. We are not calling for some great investigation - merely asking that the parties speak under oath and with transcripts.. Not really too much to ask - and not expensive at all. In fact - far cheaper than the presidents option that instead congress should spend its time reading thousands of already doctored e-mails.

    duh... what a travesty to ask that people who speak to congress be held accountable for what they say.
  • Bu2Bu2 Posts: 1,693
    and it could be something. The die-hard Repugs will say it's nothing. And it might turn out for the Dems that it really is nothing.

    But if it's something, and Bush continues to argue against digging any further in this so-called "fishing expedition" over nothing, well....wouldn't that be something?
    Feels Good Inc.
  • Abuskedti wrote:
    Help me understaind.. We are not calling for some great investigation - merely asking that the parties speak under oath and with transcripts.. Not really too much to ask - and not expensive at all. In fact - far cheaper than the presidents option that instead congress should spend its time reading thousands of already doctored e-mails.

    duh... what a travesty to ask that people who speak to congress be held accountable for what they say.

    :)
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • PJ_SalukiPJ_Saluki Posts: 1,006
    zstillings wrote:
    But witch hunts always are. Congressional hearings are never about getting to the truth. They are always about grandstanding.

    But how can they guarantee that Rove would give honest testimony if he's not under oath? I just don't see the guy as incredibly honest. He could still lie under oath but I think it's less likely than if it's him, three of his lawyers and a bunch of Dem suits and lawyers all in a room.
    "Almost all those politicians took money from Enron, and there they are holding hearings. That's like O.J. Simpson getting in the Rae Carruth jury pool." -- Charles Barkley
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    PJ_Saluki wrote:
    But how can they guarantee that Rove would give honest testimony if he's not under oath? I just don't see the guy as incredibly honest. He could still lie under oath but I think it's less likely than if it's him, three of his lawyers and a bunch of Dem suits and lawyers all in a room.

    you should see the doc, based on the book of the same name, Bush's Brain...it's all about rove...according to it republicans complained to the head of the gop, george bush, sr, about rove and his dishonest tactics, saying they wanted him out b/c they didn't approve of it...bush, instead, gave him a job working for him!
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    Abuskedti wrote:
    Help me understaind.. We are not calling for some great investigation - merely asking that the parties speak under oath and with transcripts.. Not really too much to ask - and not expensive at all. In fact - far cheaper than the presidents option that instead congress should spend its time reading thousands of already doctored e-mails.

    duh... what a travesty to ask that people who speak to congress be held accountable for what they say.

    It is a waste because Presidents have the authority to fire prosecutors at will. Clinton did it but no one seemed to think it was a problem back then. Was the timing a bit strange yes. Usually a President will fire prosecutors who are hold-overs from the previous administration. They usually don't fire prosecutors who where appointed during their administration.

    This is a pathetic attempt by the Dems to try to pin something on this administration. Why don't they grow a true set of balls and go after them for something serious like the Plame leak or the faulty intell that led us into Iraq or even the horrid mismanagement of the war.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • WMAWMA Posts: 175
    mammasan wrote:
    It is a waste because Presidents have the authority to fire prosecutors at will. Clinton did it but no one seemed to think it was a problem back then. Was the timing a bit strange yes. Usually a President will fire prosecutors who are hold-overs from the previous administration. They usually don't fire prosecutors who where appointed during their administration.

    This is a pathetic attempt by the Dems to try to pin something on this administration. Why don't they grow a true set of balls and go after them for something serious like the Plame leak or the faulty intell that led us into Iraq or even the horrid mismanagement of the war.

    There are a couple differences though.

    They were replaced at the start of the term (which G.W.B. did also btw with no trouble at all) and the Senate had a vote on the replacements, which is a good system to keep the crazies out. It has always kept all of them more or less moderate, as law and politics aren't really a good mix.

    Because of a provision snuck into the patriot act the AG could just appoint the new ones until a couple days ago when they repealed it.

    There is also the question of certain investigations that were halted because of the moves.
  • blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    WMA wrote:
    There are a couple differences though.

    They were replaced at the start of the term (which G.W.B. did also btw with no trouble at all) and the Senate had a vote on the replacements, which is a good system to keep the crazies out. It has always kept all of them more or less moderate, as law and politics aren't really a good mix.

    Because of a provision snuck into the patriot act the AG could just appoint the new ones until a couple days ago when they repealed it.

    There is also the question of certain investigations that were halted because of the moves.

    And the allegations that they removed the ones who were prosecuting republicans or not pursuing cases against democrats that the administration wanted them to.

    The justice department should pursue the cases that make the most sense in terms of stopping crime, not because of a political agenda.

    It just makes me want to through a brick through the TV when I hear Bush or Snow on TV talking about congress just playing politics. No shit they are playing politics, but they are playing it against an administration who has played politics with every single issue since coming in to office.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    mammasan wrote:
    It is a waste because Presidents have the authority to fire prosecutors at will. Clinton did it but no one seemed to think it was a problem back then. Was the timing a bit strange yes. Usually a President will fire prosecutors who are hold-overs from the previous administration. They usually don't fire prosecutors who where appointed during their administration.

    This is a pathetic attempt by the Dems to try to pin something on this administration. Why don't they grow a true set of balls and go after them for something serious like the Plame leak or the faulty intell that led us into Iraq or even the horrid mismanagement of the war.

    I agree about the other things you say they should do. However, this appears to be potentially serious. The implication is that the Executive Branch fired US Attorneys because they were pursuing charges against Republicans. That seems like obstruction of justice. The interviews, under oath, may yield nothing - depending upon how well the accused have coordinated their story. But a simple hearing is not excessive.
  • JaneNYJaneNY Posts: 4,438
    Abuskedti wrote:
    But a simple hearing is not excessive.

    Agreed, and besides, following along with the type of logic of the current administration, why should they mind testifying under oath if they've done nothing wrong?
    R.i.p. Rigoberto Alpizar.
    R.i.p. My Dad - May 28, 2007
    R.i.p. Black Tail (cat) - Sept. 20, 2008
  • AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    PJ_Saluki wrote:
    But how can they guarantee that Rove would give honest testimony if he's not under oath? I just don't see the guy as incredibly honest. He could still lie under oath but I think it's less likely than if it's him, three of his lawyers and a bunch of Dem suits and lawyers all in a room.

    He wont tell the truth just because he is under oath. Under oath - with transcripts allows the opportunity to compare testimony of all parties. When people lie - inconsistancies are inevitable. Because they were under oath, they will be compelled to explain the inconsistencies.

    Of course they always have the "I can't remember" option.

    But it will still lead to a better understanding of what happened - and will show these behind the scenes ass holes that they have to play a little more fair in the future.
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    what happened to the "well, if you've got nothing to hide" crowd...

    it's funny, bushy and is supporters were all for warrantless wiretaps, yet, when it comes there turn to monitored and scrutinized, they fight like trapped animal...
  • Drew263Drew263 Birmingham, AL Posts: 602
    mammasan wrote:
    This is a gigantic waste of time and money but I think every damn Republican should shut the fuck up because I'm sure most where in full support of the Clinton investigation.

    I wasn't. That was just another example of politics not being about real issues. It's all bullshit. Our government is run by a bunch of greedy, power hungry douchbags. Every politician.

    Which is exactly I don't trust them and want them to leave me the fuck alone.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    Abuskedti wrote:
    I agree about the other things you say they should do. However, this appears to be potentially serious. The implication is that the Executive Branch fired US Attorneys because they were pursuing charges against Republicans. That seems like obstruction of justice. The interviews, under oath, may yield nothing - depending upon how well the accused have coordinated their story. But a simple hearing is not excessive.

    It's not just a simple hearing though. Now we are probably headed into a legal battle between Congress and the White House. Look I, like many others, would love to see this administration nailed for all the shit they have done. I just think this is a fishing expedition to try to find something minor to get them on. If the Dems really want to go after this White House then go for the gold. We still haven't seen anyone brought to justice for leaking Plame's identity. We still don't have any accountability for Iraq. Don't waste time and my tax dollars going after someone just because they may have fired some prosecuters for political reasons. Yes it's wrong but compared to everything else it's small beans.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    Drew263 wrote:
    I wasn't. That was just another example of politics not being about real issues. It's all bullshit. Our government is run by a bunch of greedy, power hungry douchbags. Every politician.

    Which is exactly I don't trust them and want them to leave me the fuck alone.

    Sorry if you thought I meant Republicans on this board. I was referring to the republicans in Congress.

    I feel the same way you do. I detest them. Most of them have done everything in their power to serve their own interest at the expense of the this country and the people. Our government is broken and the only ones that can do anything about it, us, are to busy eating the shit they feed us.

    Thomas Jefferson said it best. The moment that our government fails to serve the people it is time to over throw it.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
Sign In or Register to comment.