Blindfolded and Isolated Brits in Iran

AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
edited April 2007 in A Moving Train
Georgie says thats just fine... Iran is free to interpret the Geneva Convention.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • hailhailkchailhailkc Posts: 582
    Abuskedti wrote:
    Georgie says thats just fine... Iran is free to interpret the Geneva Convention.

    What are YOUR thoughts on how the Brits were treated by the Iranians?
    MOSSAD NATO Alphabet Stations (E10)
    High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
    Low Traffic CIO MIW
    Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
  • MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,672
    hailhailkc wrote:
    What are YOUR thoughts on how the Brits were treated by the Iranians?

    They were treated better than the way america treats it's prisoners.
  • spiral outspiral out Posts: 1,052
    MrBrian wrote:
    They were treated better than the way america treats it's prisoners.

    Indeed they were.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    hailhailkc wrote:
    What are YOUR thoughts on how the Brits were treated by the Iranians?

    I think they acted perfectly appropriately.

    If Iran had invaded and occupied Mexico for more then 4 years.. and an Iranean tank was wandering around 1.7 miles from Corpus Christi... I'd take surely challenge them - detain them - and question them.
  • AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    They were only kept a couple of weeks and released because no serious crime was committed. very appropriate.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Abuskedti wrote:
    They were only kept a couple of weeks and released because no serious crime was committed. very appropriate.


    so being bound, blindfolded, and threatened is very appropriate?
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    so being bound, blindfolded, and threatened is very appropriate?


    Let's just leave it at blindfolded, jlew. No need to push the thought process any further.
    "Sarcasm: intellect on the offensive"

    "What I lack in decorum, I make up for with an absence of tact."

    Camden 5-28-06
    Washington, D.C. 6-22-08
  • ForestBrainForestBrain Posts: 460
    MrBrian wrote:
    They were treated better than the way america treats it's prisoners.
    :: Claps hands ::
    When life gives you lemons, throw them at somebody.
  • By TARIQ PANJA, Associated Press Writer Fri Apr 6, 1:19 PM ET

    ROYAL MARINE BASE CHIVENOR, England - British sailors and marines held for nearly two weeks in
    Iran were blindfolded, bound and threatened with prison if they did not say they had strayed into Iranian waters, a Royal Navy lieutenant who was among the capitives said Friday.
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Lt. Felix Carman, safely home with his 14 colleagues, said the crew faced harsh interrogation by their Iranian captors and slept in stone cells on piles of blankets. Unable to see and kept isolated, they heard weapons cocking.

    "We were blindfolded, our hands were bound and we were forced up against a wall. Throughout our ordeal we faced constant psychological pressure," Carman said. "All of us were kept in isolation. We were interrogated most nights and presented with two options. If we admitted that we'd strayed, we'd be on a plane to (Britain) pretty soon. If we didn't, we faced up to seven years in prison."

    Within hours of the news conference, Iranian state television said the British military had "dictated" to its sailors what to say.

    Royal Marine Capt. Chris Air said the crew of 15, which was out on a routine operation on March 23, was confronted by members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard.

    "They rammed our boats, and trained their heavy machine guns, RPGs, and weapons on us. Another six boats were closing in on us," Air said. "We realized that had we resisted there would have been a major fight, one we could not have won, with consequences that would have major strategic impacts. We made a conscious decision not to engage the Iranians."

    Iran insists the British strayed into its territory; the sailors and the British government deny the accusation and maintain they were in Iraqi waters.

    Britain's top naval officer said boarding operations would be suspended while a review is conducted.

    "Coalition operations continue under U.K. command," said Adm. Jonathon Band, head of the Royal Navy. "Currently, our (operations) have been suspended while we do that review."

    The most visible of the seized sailors and marines was Leading Seaman Faye Turney, a 26-year-old mother of one. Her letters home received widespread publicity in Britain, particularly one in which she requested the British government withdraw from
    Iraq.

    Air said she was singled out for propaganda purposes, held in solitary confinement and told the others had gone home.

    "Being an Islamic country, Faye was subjected to different rules than we were. She was separated as soon as she arrived, and was told that her colleagues had been flown home," Air said. "She coped admirably and has maintained a lot of dignity."

    While much of the country rallied behind the crew's return, others criticized them for offering apologies where none was required — namely for appearing in videos in which they admitted and offered regrets for entering Iranian waters.

    The servicemen said they had tried to be vague about whether they had strayed into Iranian waters in statements they made during captivity.

    "We were very careful about what we said and what we didn't say," Air told The Associated Press. He said the Iranian captors were humane, but said there were a "few incidents when our safety was at risk."

    It's not possible to know everything the sailors and marines said to their captors but at least some statements avoided saying definitely they were in Iran's waters.

    For example, in one of the letters made public from Turney, she said she had "apparently gone into Iranian waters." In a video clip from Iranian TV, Air said "we were seized apparently at this point here on their maps and on the GPS they've shown us, which is inside Iranian territorial waters."

    Carman had been pictured on Iranian television saying he "understood" why Iran was angry the crew had strayed into their waters. At Friday's news conference, he said the crew was nearly two nautical miles from Iran's territory — and that they had never apologized.

    "Let me make this clear — irrespective of what was said in the past — when we were detained by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard we were inside internationally recognized Iraqi territorial waters," he said. "At no time did we actually say were sorry for straying into Iranian waters."

    In its news report on the sailors, Iranian state TV accusing Britain of dictating statements to the crew, saying "the British sailors only read from pages dictated to them."

    Air and Carmen were among six of the crew members who chose to speak publicly Friday.

    Band told British Broadcasting Corp. radio that the crew had "acted with considerable dignity and a lot of courage."

    "They appear to have played it by the rules, they don't appear to have put themselves into danger, others into danger, they don't appear to have given anything away," he said. "I think, in the end, they were a credit to us."

    Britain insisted the crew was on a routine operation when seized — but Sky News reported Thursday that Air said in an interview days before his capture that his crew was gathering intelligence on Iran during their patrols. Sky said it held the interview because it thought it could hamper the crew's release.

    Defense ministry officials denied the sailors and marines had an intelligence role, but said they routinely spoke to commanders of vessels using the Persian Gulf and Shatt Al-Arab waterway to determine who was using shipping routes.

    Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced Wednesday that the Britons would be released — a breakthrough in a crisis that had raised oil prices and escalated fears of military conflict in the volatile region. The move suggested Iran's hard-line leadership had decided it had shown its strength but did not want to push the standoff too far.

    But Iran did not get the main thing it sought — a public apology for entering Iranian waters. Britain insists it never offered a deal, instead relying on quiet and sometimes silent diplomacy.
    "Sarcasm: intellect on the offensive"

    "What I lack in decorum, I make up for with an absence of tact."

    Camden 5-28-06
    Washington, D.C. 6-22-08
  • These guys weren't even offered Bibles.
    "Sarcasm: intellect on the offensive"

    "What I lack in decorum, I make up for with an absence of tact."

    Camden 5-28-06
    Washington, D.C. 6-22-08
  • AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    jlew24asu wrote:
    so being bound, blindfolded, and threatened is very appropriate?

    how can you even ask that as we roam the streets of Bagdad in tanks.

    It is absolutely appropriate. They were in a military boat approaching (assuming they are telling the truth about the 1.7 miles) a free nation - they did not contact Iran to say we would be nearing your borders.. they just chose to sneak around with a weapon.

    How would you react if a couple of armed men were circling your yard at a safe 20 yards?

    They were essentially prisoners of war. They were treated far better than those taken by most other countries - certainly far better than those take by the United States.

    It was determined that they were likely not threatening Iran and released.

    What exactly could your beef be with that?

    They were not hurt.. They were only scared.. in large percentage because of the Evil perception created by the political western war machine.. These poor British soldiers were scared to death because they thought they were held my real live evil terrorist people - you know the one lurking by the thousands - that hate us for our freedom and are cold blooded people hating torture experts...

    Had they understood that Iraneans are just like you and me - they probably wouldn't have been scared at all. If they were captured by Americans - blindfolded and taken to a room and told they if they continue lying about their location - they would face charges.. They smirk and say I want to speak to my embasy.. and not go back crying "they blindfolded me and threatened me - and I was really scared!

    It was absolutely nothing.... but because you think they are monsters - you think it was some terrible thing..

    How many uncharged prisoners are held right now by the US actually being tortured? And for years!
  • RushlimboRushlimbo Posts: 832
    Dick Cheney and the boys say waterboarding is nothing terrible so I dont see what blindfolding and being locked in a room is so bad. Half the idiots supporting how terrible they were treated defended the way captives are treated in Gitmo. These guys are lightweights.

    Are we supposed to believe anything we have heard as "confessions" from our captives if these guys broke so easily when blindfolded?? OOOOOOOHHHHH, scary...its dark. I'll say anything you want me to, just give me some light.
    War is Peace
    Freedom is Slavery
    Ignorance is Strength
Sign In or Register to comment.